[CLC-Discussion] Notice of Contest of Lien question

RPPTL CLC-Discussion clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Wed Sep 6 09:38:00 PDT 2023


Our experience is that title examiners are a cross between the oracle in
"The Matrix" and the "precogs" in "Minority Report," and that their
conclusions and concerns are both untethered from the Florida Construction
Lien Law and, therefore, immune from divination by mere mortals (i.e.,
construction lawyers). Just our $0.02.

 


Bryan L. Capps, Esq.




Board Certified in Construction Law by The Florida Bar


The Construction Law Firm


P.O. Box 560693


Orlando, FL 32856




(407) 674-0674




(407) 808-0098




bcapps at theconstructionlawfirm.com <mailto:bcapps at theconstructionlawfirm.com>





www.theconstructionlawfirm.com <http://www.theconstructionlawfirm.com/> 


Offices: Orlando

 

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
<clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> On Behalf Of RPPTL
CLC-Discussion
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 10:49 AM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Notice of Contest of Lien question

 

Having the trial judge enter an order discharging the lien is the best way
to proceed since title insurers are unlikely to trust the potential
non-existence of an event as a basis to underwrite title.  Trusting that a
title company will proceed simply by showing the existence of the lawsuit
and lienor's failure to file a counterclaim within 20 days will, in my
experience, result in a delayed closing.  I would take the extra step and
make sure the transaction is not scuttled.

 

 

Chip Bachara

Managing Partner - Board Certified in Construction Law

BACHARA CONSTRUCTION LAW GROUP

One Independent Dr., Ste. 1800, Jacksonville, FL 32202

Phone: 904.562.1060 | Direct Line: 904.562.1066

Website | Biography | Download vCard

 

Confidentiality Notice: This message is being sent by or on behalf of a
lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it
is addressed. This communication may contain information that is
proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from
disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to
read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If
you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
<clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> > On Behalf Of RPPTL
CLC-Discussion
Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 10:39 AM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
<mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org> 
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Notice of Contest of Lien question

 

There is a recent case in Fla L. Weekly that was remanded to the trial court
for other reasons, but instructed the trial judge to enter an order
discharging the  lien. 

For what its worth. 

 

J. Thomas McKeel, Esq.

J. Thomas McKeel, P.A.

303 Centre Street, Suite 103

Fernandina Beach, FL  32034

 <mailto:jtm at mckeellaw.com> jtm at mckeellaw.com

904-261-9437

 

-----Original Message-----

From:  <mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org <
<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> On Behalf Of RPPTL
CLC-Discussion

Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 10:23 AM

To:  <mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org

Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Notice of Contest of Lien question

 

This is a great question from a title perspective. Scott is correct that it
is self executing, but if you're trying to get clear title for either a sale
or new loan, there's not an easy answer. If it were 100% guaranteed that
someone filing suit would record a notice of lis pendens, then the absence
of that document in the public records would clear it up, but that's not a
100% guarantee.

 

 

Sometimes a title insurer will insure after 60 days (after they probably
also check the clerk's docket). But sometimes they won't. I have a couple of
times in the past prepared an affidavit for recording that would recite
recording and service of the notice of contest (attaching as exhibits the
recorded notice and hopefully proof of service from the Clerk), and that
I've reviewed the public records and there was no notice of lis pendens
recorded, and that I've reviewed the docket and could find no suit that was
filed. I suppose that's in theory like the "title opinions" that attorneys
used to issue (although those weren't recorded). I think on the most recent
one I did (which was probably several years ago) I put in the affidavit the
search terms I had used for the searches for the suit and the notice of lis
pendens and may have even attached copies of results. It's hard to prove a
negative....

 

 

You also need to check that it was actually served by the clerk. I had one
years ago where the clerk didn't serve it (despite saying they did on the
face of the recorded notice of contest), and when the suit was filed, we got
into a spat about it. The case ultimately settled so there was never a legal
ruling, although I have in my head that there is a published opinion out
there where something similar happened, but I don't recall the outcome.
Perhaps someone in this august group will have that more at hand than I do.

 

 

Bruce Partington | Shareholder

 
<mailto:bpartington at clarkpartington.com%3cmailto:bpartington at clarkpartington
.com>
bpartington at clarkpartington.com<mailto:bpartington at clarkpartington.com> |
(850) 432-1399< <callto:(850)%20432-1399> callto:(850)%20432-1399> CLARK
PARTINGTON

Office: (850) 434-9200 | Fax: (850) 432-7340

125 East Intendencia Street, 4th Floor

Pensacola, Florida 32502

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__clarkpartington.com&d=Dw
ICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumbsk
5OjqSk9e1_HFDlIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTGA7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcbrb
sOAi-m4s9ef&s=0PFEjlrJ6EY0EALfHXYR37CSm9Ju1y2D9NlVedh_EA4&e=<https://urldefe
nse.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__clarkpartington.com_&d=DwICAg&c=euGZst
caTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumbsk5OjqSk9e1_HFD
lIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTGA7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcbrbsOAi-m4s9ef&s
=1ho_34TxIrODfb7p_WgfFIa0KgH202cdNu95ZgDJhhU&e=>

[cid:logo4_09e57621-d955-46d0-aad5-1c620e3975ef.jpg]

 

 

Bruce Partington | Shareholder

Board Certified Specialist in Construction Law
<mailto:bpartington at clarkpartington.com%3cmailto:bpartington at clarkpartington
.com>
bpartington at clarkpartington.com<mailto:bpartington at clarkpartington.com> |
(850) 432-1399

 

CLARK PARTINGTON

Office: (850) 434-9200 | Fax: (850) 432-7340

125 East Intendencia Street, 4th Floor

Pensacola, Florida 32502

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__clarkpartington.com&d=Dw
ICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumbsk
5OjqSk9e1_HFDlIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTGA7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcbrb
sOAi-m4s9ef&s=0PFEjlrJ6EY0EALfHXYR37CSm9Ju1y2D9NlVedh_EA4&e=<https://urldefe
nse.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__clarkpartington.com_&d=DwICAg&c=euGZst
caTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumbsk5OjqSk9e1_HFD
lIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTGA7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcbrbsOAi-m4s9ef&s
=1ho_34TxIrODfb7p_WgfFIa0KgH202cdNu95ZgDJhhU&e=>

 

[cid:logo4_d1062d3d-30e4-47df-99af-a59488723ed9.jpg]<
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__clarkpartington.com_&d=
DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumb
sk5OjqSk9e1_HFDlIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTGA7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcb
rbsOAi-m4s9ef&s=vvjpFPuQ4qusmSYyOWjbWNSD7o_ILBwzFrDuMT5SVks&e=>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__clarkpartington.com_&d=D
wICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumbs
k5OjqSk9e1_HFDlIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTGA7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcbr
bsOAi-m4s9ef&s=vvjpFPuQ4qusmSYyOWjbWNSD7o_ILBwzFrDuMT5SVks&e=>

 

 

 

________________________________

From:  <mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org <
<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> on behalf of RPPTL
CLC-Discussion < <mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>

Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2023 8:50:32 AM

To: RPPTL CLC-Discussion

Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Notice of Contest of Lien question

 

Hello:

 

I have a client that recorded the Notice of Contest of Lien and the clerk
served it.  No suit was filed and per 713.22 the lien is extinguished
automatically.

But how do they show that in public records?  I have not had this issue
before. Thank you for the help.

 

 

Best regards,

 

Daniel Greene

Daniel M. Greene, P.A.

Florida Board Certified in Construction Law Florida Supreme Court Certified
Circuit Civil and Appellate Mediator P.O. Box 3092 Orlando, FL 32802-3092

407-448-5391

 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__link.edgepilot.com_s_3
58b25c8_bpkMReFyR0q8cBkR-5FJUvDg-3Fu-3Dhttp-3A__www.dangreenelaw.com_&d=DwIC
Ag&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumbsk5O
jqSk9e1_HFDlIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTGA7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcbrbsO
Ai-m4s9ef&s=M_d9qihTb2NV4rUc60EEo2DSL7Ynb5NKDpxI0dwJYXw&e=>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__link.edgepilot.com_s_35
8b25c8_bpkMReFyR0q8cBkR-5FJUvDg-3Fu-3Dhttp-3A__www.dangreenelaw.com_&d=DwICA
g&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumbsk5Oj
qSk9e1_HFDlIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTGA7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcbrbsOA
i-m4s9ef&s=M_d9qihTb2NV4rUc60EEo2DSL7Ynb5NKDpxI0dwJYXw&e=

 <mailto:dan at dangreenelaw.com> dan at dangreenelaw.com

 <mailto:dangreenelaw at gmail.com> dangreenelaw at gmail.com

 

To ensure compliance with Treasury Regulations (31 CFR Part 10, Sec. 10.35),
we inform you that any tax advice contained in this correspondence was not
intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used by you or anyone
else, for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue
Code.

___________

NOTE: This e-mail is from Daniel M. Greene, P.A., and is intended for the
recipient(s)only. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender immediately, delete the e-mail and do not copy or disclose it. If you
are not an existing client, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make
you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do
not disclose anything to Daniel M. Greene, P.A. that you expect to be
confidential. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel
or retained expert, you should maintain its contents in confidence to
preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege.

 

 

 

_______________________________________________

CLC-Discussion mailing list

 <mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org

 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.fsr.com_mailman
_listinfo_clc-2Ddiscussion&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnV
fiiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumbsk5OjqSk9e1_HFDlIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTG
A7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcbrbsOAi-m4s9ef&s=WIu4zeczJ55J7pBASwVkzOS5CUJAZwe
7hL6A4DCtNkY&e=>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.fsr.com_mailman_
listinfo_clc-2Ddiscussion&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVf
iiMM&r=iQXiL3peYedbGnRTjOumbsk5OjqSk9e1_HFDlIssKw4&m=jHgmd93bWK3xGJ5tc8OsTGA
7-C6sVDrsmdxZF8-qZJ4rmZSFQcbrbsOAi-m4s9ef&s=WIu4zeczJ55J7pBASwVkzOS5CUJAZwe7
hL6A4DCtNkY&e=

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20230906/43657986/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 14205 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20230906/43657986/image001-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 406 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20230906/43657986/image003-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20230906/43657986/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 338 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20230906/43657986/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 340 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20230906/43657986/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20230906/43657986/image002-0001.png>


More information about the CLC-Discussion mailing list