[CLC-Discussion] Unsafe structure order, time past for compliance, and innocent buyer

RPPTL CLC-Discussion clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Thu Jun 16 07:00:32 PDT 2022


Just off the top of my head, have you considered an action/relief under the Private Property Rights Protection Act, Fla. Stat. Ch. 70 <http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0070/0070.html> ? It applies to cities/municipalities, to  “acti[ons] on an application or a permit or adopting or enforcing any ordinance, resolution, regulation, rule, or policy,” and provides for recovery of attorneys’ fees. Emphasis added.

 


Bryan L. Capps, Esq.




Board Certified in Construction Law by The Florida Bar


The Construction Law Firm


P.O. Box 560693


Orlando, FL 32856




(407) 674-0674




(407) 808-0098




bcapps at theconstructionlawfirm.com




www.theconstructionlawfirm.com <http://www.theconstructionlawfirm.com/> 


Offices: Orlando

 

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org <clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org> On Behalf Of RPPTL CLC-Discussion
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 8:48 AM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Unsafe structure order, time past for compliance, and innocent buyer

 

I was wondering if any of you all have thoughts or ideas regarding the below issue. Thank you

 

FACTS:

Contractor/client bought property.

Title commitment showed Miami order that if permits not pulled by date certain property would be demolished.

Date to pull permits expired before client even bought property.

Title company says they warned client.

In fact, Client signed hold harmless to title company and underwriter regarding the City Order.

Fast forward many months later.

Client attempts to pull permit to bring property into compliance.

City refuses to process the permit as untimely, citing the Order.

It has been many many months since deadline to pull permits expired.

City still has not demolished the property.

Following conversation with City attorney, she refuses to allow any type of permit to be pulled to bring the property into compliance.

 

ISSUE:

 

  1.  A Taking.                            City has not done anything with property, won’t let client develop it, is there a federal case to be had as a Taking?

  2.  Economic Waste.             For the City to demolish the property, only to then let Client pull permits to rebuild the same property, and then bring property into compliance sounds like economic waste.

  3.  Injunctive Relief.              Both mandatory (requiring the city to demolish the structure/ or to issue the permits), or Prohibitive (to stop the City from demolishing the property)

 

 

 


Sincerely yours,

Address:   1720 Harrison Street, Penthouse B


 

                   Hollywood, FL 33020


 

Office:       (954) 620-5000

	
Fax:            (954) 620-5105


 

Bryce Gilbert, Esq.

Web#1:      <http://www.theconstructionlawyers.com/> www.TheConstructionLawyers.com 

Web#2:      <https://ftic.net/> https://ftic.net  


Senior Partner 

	



 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220616/4d124d02/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 14205 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220616/4d124d02/image002-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 406 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220616/4d124d02/image004-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220616/4d124d02/image005-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 338 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220616/4d124d02/image006-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.png
Type: image/png
Size: 340 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220616/4d124d02/image007-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 42149 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220616/4d124d02/image008-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220616/4d124d02/image003-0001.png>


More information about the CLC-Discussion mailing list