[CLC-Discussion] 553.84 damages

[RPPTL CLC-Discussion]

I'm interested in others' thoughts on this.

We know two things about breach of contract damages under Grossman Holdings: (1) that they are to be measured as of the time of the breach (Jeremy Stewart Constr., Inc. v. Matthews, 324 So. 3d 41 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)) - with interest accruing since that time; and (2) that they are limited to diminution in value if the cost to correct would be "unreasonable economic waste." --- BUT - what about damages under 553.84? Since the building code has the force of law, and is for the purposes of life safety, etc., wouldn't damages for a 553.84 claim have neither of those constraints? I.e. wouldn't they, for public policy reasons, be measured by the current cost to correct and not be limited by the economic waste constraint because the law requires their correction?

I can find zero cases or other authorities that even touch this point.

Thoughts from this august group?  Am I Don Quixote here?

Bruce Partington | Shareholder
bpartington at clarkpartington.com<mailto:bpartington at clarkpartington.com> | (850) 432-1399<callto:(850)%20432-1399>

CLARK PARTINGTON
Office: (850) 434-9200 | Fax: (850) 432-7340
125 East Intendencia Street, 4th Floor
Pensacola, Florida 32502
clarkpartington.com<https://clarkpartington.com/>

[cid:logo4_09e57621-d955-46d0-aad5-1c620e3975ef.jpg]

[cid:Facebook_55598884-7995-4d93-92d3-5101d580d70c.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ClarkPartington/> [cid:LinkedIn_57c89113-2875-479d-9fdd-fd3a2a809f98.png] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/2250553/admin/>  [cid:Twitter_216c94ca-a91c-458c-ad76-295500e4747c.png] <https://twitter.com/ClarkPartington>  [cid:Instagram_c437b822-13ce-4d58-87bc-212014b134fa.png] <https://www.instagram.com/clarkpartington/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220609/2fc7308a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logo4_09e57621-d955-46d0-aad5-1c620e3975ef.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 27207 bytes
Desc: logo4_09e57621-d955-46d0-aad5-1c620e3975ef.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220609/2fc7308a/logo4_09e57621-d955-46d0-aad5-1c620e3975ef-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Facebook_55598884-7995-4d93-92d3-5101d580d70c.png
Type: image/png
Size: 365 bytes
Desc: Facebook_55598884-7995-4d93-92d3-5101d580d70c.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220609/2fc7308a/Facebook_55598884-7995-4d93-92d3-5101d580d70c-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: LinkedIn_57c89113-2875-479d-9fdd-fd3a2a809f98.png
Type: image/png
Size: 468 bytes
Desc: LinkedIn_57c89113-2875-479d-9fdd-fd3a2a809f98.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220609/2fc7308a/LinkedIn_57c89113-2875-479d-9fdd-fd3a2a809f98-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Twitter_216c94ca-a91c-458c-ad76-295500e4747c.png
Type: image/png
Size: 619 bytes
Desc: Twitter_216c94ca-a91c-458c-ad76-295500e4747c.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220609/2fc7308a/Twitter_216c94ca-a91c-458c-ad76-295500e4747c-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Instagram_c437b822-13ce-4d58-87bc-212014b134fa.png
Type: image/png
Size: 621 bytes
Desc: Instagram_c437b822-13ce-4d58-87bc-212014b134fa.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20220609/2fc7308a/Instagram_c437b822-13ce-4d58-87bc-212014b134fa-0001.png>