[CLC-Discussion] Lien Right?:

[Gibbons, Michael]

If the scope of work doesn't require a state license but the handyman is doing work improving the property (e.g. Painting, carpet or tile install) the work would be lienable regardless of non-state licensure under Ch. 489. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 7, 2015, at 10:23 PM, Sean A. Mickley <smickley at gouldcooksey.com> wrote:
> 
> Does a handyman performing repairs and improvements in excess of $2,500 which do not require a license have lien rights on the property?
> 
> I understand that florida law requires a contractor be licensed in order to lien property, but it does not require a license for material men or laborers to lien the property. Arguably, the handyman is a hybrid between the two. I would appreciate any insight on this issue.
> 
> My initial conclusion is that the handyman does not have lien rights but I'd like to gather your collective thoughts.
> 
> Sean A. Mickley, Esq.
> Gould Cooksey Fennell, P.A.
> 979 Beachland Blvd.
> Vero Beach, FL 32963
> 772-231-1100
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CLC-Discussion mailing list
> CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
> 

This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by Mimecast.  For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com