[CLC-Discussion] [CLC Discussion] - Traveling employees
lan at lwwhiteattorney.com
lan at lwwhiteattorney.com
Tue Jun 17 14:26:45 PDT 2014
Do you mean their travel home is not compensated? I don't know of any
reason, off the top of my head, why the employer would have to do that. But
if they are being prevented from returning home by force or threat, it seems
to me they would be considered on the job and working, hence would have to
get paid (overtime?) for all the weekend hours. If they are not being
compensated, and are being prevented from using off duty time to go home, it
seems to me there might be a slight Constitutional issue, specifically the
13th amendment. I have this vague recollection reading that we did away with
slavery about 150 years ago.
Regards,
Lan White
(727) 797-5599
cid:part1.09030708.03060606 at elliott-berger.com AAA 2014 logo print
From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Leonardo
Ortiz
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 3:42 PM
To: clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] [CLC Discussion] - Traveling employees
Good afternoon everyone:
I have a new issue that I wanted to run by the group because I'm having
difficulty finding anything on point. I have a contactor client who has
employees working on an out of state construction projects. The employees
used to be permitted to come home every 3 weeks. Now the employees are
being held on the job for 6 weeks and they are starting to complain. There
are no issues about payment of wages.
I wanted to find out if anyone was aware of any federal law or standard
which governs when traveling employees must be allowed to travel home.
Please email me directly at lno at leonardoortizpa.com
Regards,
Lenny
Description: certification logo
Leonardo N. Ortiz, Esq.
Leonardo Ortiz, P.A.
2719 Hollywood Blvd. #166
Hollywood, FL 33020
Tel: 954-483-9804
*Note new mailing address
<http://www.leonardoortizpa.com/> www.leonardoortizpa.com
Board Certified in Construction Law
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any
attachments may be legally privileged, confidential and/or otherwise exempt
from disclosure and is intended only for the recipient named above. If you
are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
permanently delete the email and any attachments immediately. You should not
retain, copy or use this email or any attachment for any purpose, nor
disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140617/8b903f1d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 49086 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140617/8b903f1d/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13463 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140617/8b903f1d/image003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4889 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20140617/8b903f1d/image004.jpg>
More information about the CLC-Discussion
mailing list