[CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty

Fri Oct 5 14:28:30 PDT 2012

Thank you all for the many helpful responses.  Had no idea this would
generate such a response.

Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824

THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A  CONFIDENTIAL 
AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED 
RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION 
IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE 
AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; 
AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT 
BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE 
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER 
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS 
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.

  _____  

From: Chris Iseley [mailto:CIseley at FI-LAW.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:58 PM
To: John Trawick; Willis, David; Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson;
clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: RE: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty

Like Reese, I have been asked the same question numerous times.  It is
always fun trying to prove something does NOT exist.  Have a great weekend
all.

Christopher J. Iseley

Board Certified in Construction Law

Franson & Iseley, P.A.

1650 Prudential Drive, Suite 100

Jacksonville, Florida 32207

Telephone: (904) 396-1800

Facsimile: (904) 396-1804

ciseley at fi-law.com

Franson & Iseley, P.A.  E-Mail Confidentiality Notice

This transmission may be:  (1) subject to the attorney -client privilege;
(2) attorney work product; or (3) strictly confidential.  If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or
disseminate this information. If you have received this information in
error, please reply, notify the sender, and delete the message.
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal law.

From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of John
Trawick
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:39 PM
To: Willis, David; Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson;
clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty

It's like syringe needles in payphones, kidney thieves, birds exploding from
rice at weddings, Pop Rocks & Coke, Rod Stewart and.well, you know.  Pure
urban legend.

Description: cid:62762185-b1e0-4780-a697-a3a667c17288 at exg5.exghost.com

-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Willis,
David
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:09 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson;
clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty

Steve,

You are not alone.  

David C. Willis

Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation Rumberger, Kirk
& Caldwell, P.A.

407.839.2186

-----Original Message-----

From:  <mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org

 <mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org]>
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J.
Henderson, Jr.

Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM

To: 'Steve Thompson';  <mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org

Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty

Steve:  I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found
no evidence that such a statute exists.

Reese J. Henderson, Jr.

Board Certified Construction Attorney

GrayRobinson, P.A.

50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100

P.O. Box

Jacksonville, Florida 32202

Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109

Email:  <mailto:Reese.Henderson at gray-robinson.com>
Reese.Henderson at gray-robinson.com

This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within
the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential
information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained
expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work
product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this
message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of
the attorney-client privilege.

If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent
responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a
violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section
2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the
intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!

 al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in
and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.

Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made
herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm,
cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are
not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional
materials.

Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and
is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used
for that purpose.

-----Original Message-----

From:  <mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org

 <mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org]>
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces at lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Thompson

Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM

To:  <mailto:clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org

Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty

Hello folks,

                I have a relative who is a residential contractor.  He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner.  Most of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.

liens and surety bond claims).  I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see
such a requirement.

Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?

Thank you very much.

Steven F. Thompson, Esq.

Thompson & Brooks

412 E. Madison St., Ste 900

Tampa, Fl. 33602

813-387-1821

Fax 813-387-1824

THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A  CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED
COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE
OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF
THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE
OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE
MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION
OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.

_______________________________________________

CLC-Discussion mailing list

 <mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org

 <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion

_______________________________________________

CLC-Discussion mailing list

 <mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org

 <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion

_______________________________________________

CLC-Discussion mailing list

 <mailto:CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org>
CLC-Discussion at lists.flabarrpptl.org

 <http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20121005/a89489fc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 70069 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/clc-discussion/attachments/20121005/a89489fc/image001.jpg>