<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(33, 33, 33);" dir="auto">
Because it implicates the family law order and dissolution (and the various equitable and statutory provisions that are built in), it should go to family law counsel. Also, I suspect a family law court's ability to divide property is more expedient than a
contested partition action.</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-body-separator-line" data-applydefaultfontstyles="true" dir="auto" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<div style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<br>
</div>
</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature" dir="auto" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(33, 33, 33);">
<div style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(33, 33, 33);">
<br>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of Chris B <chrisb@firstavenuelaw.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, April 23, 2026 1:54:44 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [WSBARP] FW: Family law related matter</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos}
p.x_MsoNormal, li.x_MsoNormal, div.x_MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif}
a:link, span.x_MsoHyperlink
{color:#467886;
text-decoration:underline}
.x_MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt}
@page WordSection1
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in}
div.x_WordSection1
{}
-->
</style>
<div lang="EN-US" link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="x_WordSection1">
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">PC just called me. She is a (now former) spouse. She and her former husband did a simple divorce, with neither of them having attorneys to represent them. There is a “Final Divorce Order” which identifies
that they own a home as community property located in Bothell. There is no reference to disposition of the home, so supposedly they both still own it.
</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">I have seen similar orders in the past that discuss such things as a timeline for sale (like once it can be refinanced or once kids graduate high school) and an agreed-upon disposition of the proceeds. This
order is totally silent. </span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">The PC now wants to try and force a sale of the home. Are they now tenants in common and what they need is a partition action (something I can help them with)? Or is this still a family law matter and
should really be referred to family law counsel? </span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Chris Benis</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">First Avenue Law Group, PLLC</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">321 First Avenue West, Seattle, WA 98119</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">206.447-1900 office – 206.447.9075 fax – www. firstavenuelaw.com </span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">This message contains information that may be CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message
or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail
<a href="mailto:chrisb@firstavenuelaw.com">chrisb@firstavenuelaw.com</a>, and delete this message. Thank you very much.</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">To comply with recent IRS rules, we must inform you that this message, if it contains advice relating to federal taxes, was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding
penalties that may be imposed under federal tax law. Under recent IRS rules, a taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties only if that advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements
under federal law. Please contact me if you would like to discuss our preparation of an opinion that conforms to these new rules.</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>