<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">I think I am confused. Party A is still living in the TIC-owned house that has been sold to a third party? If the house is sold and both parties have executed a deed to the buyer, then the house isn’t TIC property any more—it belongs to
the buyer. Party A and Party B simply own the cash proceeds in proportion to their former interests in the TIC house.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Were the parties then continuing to live in the house after sale? I would expect the NCO to have a provision that says Party B’s residence is at [address] and Party A is prohbited from coming within 500 feet of Party B’s residence. But
your facts indicate that even though Party B is the protected party, the Order forces
<i>them</i> out of the house instead of the accused?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eric<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Eric C. Nelsen<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sayre Law Offices, PLLC<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">1417 31st Ave South<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Seattle WA 98144-3909<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">206-625-0092<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com"><span style="color:#0563C1">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="background:aqua;mso-highlight:aqua">Covid-19 Update -
</span></b>All attorneys are working remotely during regular business hours and are available via email and by phone. Videoconferencing also is available. Signing of estate planning documents can be completed and will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Please
direct mail and deliveries to the Seattle office.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jonathan Smith<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 15, 2023 3:07 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [WSBARP] Ouster<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Party A and B own a single family residence as tenants in common. Property has been sold and now funds are to be disbursed. If party A is charged with Assault 4 DV, but party A continues to occupy a single family residence and party B is
the is the protected party who as a result does not occupy the property, has party B been ousted? The NCO remains in effect for the duration of a 18 month SOC, has party B been legally ousted from the property? If so, how so and if not why not? Thank you.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Jonathan Smith
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Attorney at Law</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">(425)452-9797 Tel</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">(425)440-7681 Fax</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://advantagelegalgroup.com/"><span style="color:#1F497D;text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="165" height="36" style="width:1.7187in;height:.375in" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D9415B.05BA38E0" alt="Logo for email"></span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#002060">12207 NE 8th Street</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#002060">Bellevue, WA 98005</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#1F497D">This E-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC Sections 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. This information is confidential and is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.</span><span style="font-size:9.0pt"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.0pt;color:#2F5496">Legal Advice Disclaimer: You should recognize that responses provided by this email means are akin to ordinary telephone or face-to-face conversations and do not reflect the level of factual or
legal inquiry or analysis which would be applied in the case of a formal legal opinion. A formal opinion could reach a different result. This communication does not create an attorney-client relationship.
</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"> <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img border="0" width="84" height="120" style="width:.875in;height:1.25in" id="Picture_x0020_2" src="cid:image002.gif@01D9415B.05BA38E0"><img border="0" width="102" height="123" style="width:1.0625in;height:1.2812in" id="Picture_x0020_3" src="cid:image003.png@01D9415B.05BA38E0"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>