<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Segoe UI";
panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 4 2 2 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.xmsonormal, li.xmsonormal, div.xmsonormal
{mso-style-name:x_msonormal;
margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">This is a question of community property and family law and that always brings a different perspective. Frankly spouses do sign deeds to and from the community to make a loan happen or for a host of other reasons not necessarily congruent
with the recitals on a deed. The dynamic is different than in a standard arms-length transaction. It does raise a question for me about whether this kind of inquiry would also be applied in the case of people in a committed intimate relationship. Probably
so.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>michael westseattleattorney.com<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, April 5, 2022 10:16 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] Watanabe v. Watanabe<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">While it might not shed light on your case, an unpublished opinion out of Div II today had some discussion as to CP as well. Se attached <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div id="Signature">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><img width="502" height="100" style="width:5.225in;height:1.0416in" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image005.png@01D848D7.C4F5EF10"></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center">
<hr size="2" width="98%" align="center">
</div>
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">From:</span></b><span style="color:black">
</span><a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><span style="color:black"> <</span><a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><span style="color:black">> on behalf of
Jason Burnett <</span><a href="mailto:jburnett@reedlongyearlaw.com">jburnett@reedlongyearlaw.com</a><span style="color:black">><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, April 5, 2022 9:29 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> WSBA Real Property Listserv <</span><a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><span style="color:black">><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [WSBARP] Watanabe v. Watanabe</span> <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="xmsonormal">Mates-<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p>I’ve yet to see a listserve discussion of the Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion in In re Marriage of Watanabe.
<a href="https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.courts.wa.gov%2Fopinions%2Fpdf%2F1000456.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cjburnett%40reedlongyearlaw.com%7C01139fcd0e8249f33aca08da142969ef%7Cc42db07999e840ff9b106ba95e2918a6%7C0%7C0%7C637844465340914312%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=Z9z%2F6ffPxm%2F4pfJ1Qm2p1u9Ji7sR3izfALpH2drujNI%3D&reserved=0">
https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/1000456.pdf</a> I’m curious to hear the analysis and opinions of my peers. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal"><u>FACTS</u><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal">Husband and wife seek a loan to purchase a horse property and offer Wife’s separate real property as security. The bank agreed to make the loan, but only on the condition that Wife add Husband to title of the property offered as security,
since Husband had no credit history. Wife quitclaimed her interest in her separate property to herself and Husband “to establish community property.”
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal">The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the admission of extrinsic evidence to determine whether Wife “had the intent to gift her separate property to the community.” According to the Supremes “the inquiry here was not whether there was
a valid quitclaim deed but, rather, whether or not Pedersen had the intent to gift her separate property to the community. The extrinsic evidence was not admitted to dispute what the deed actually says, and the title was not altered here. The evidence was
used solely to show Pedersen’s intent, which the trial court used to determine the nature of the property.”<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal">It’s a unanimous opinion, so I guess it’s super-obvious to the nine justices who signed it, but it’s a mystery to me how the extrinsic evidence was admitted for any purpose other than contradicting the intent stated in the deed itself:
“to establish community property.” Between <i>Hudesman</i>, <i>Borghi</i> and <i>
Watanabe</i>, it feels like Washington courts are pretty far down an interpretive dead-end road when it comes to interpreting the effect of deeds—how can anyone rely on a deed anymore without first contacting the signer and asking them if they intended to do
what they said they intended to do in the deed itself?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt;text-autospace:none"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848">Jason</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848"> </span><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848">W.</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848"> </span><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848">Burnett<br>
</span></b><span style="font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848">Attorney at Law</span><b><span style="font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848"><br>
</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848">Reed Longyear Malnati Corwin & Burnett, PLLC<br>
</span><img border="0" width="201" height="67" style="width:2.0916in;height:.7in" id="x_Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image006.png@01D848D7.C4F5EF10"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848">801 Second Ave, Suite 1415<br>
Seattle, WA 98104<br>
Phone: (206) 624‑6271<br>
Fax: (206) 624‑6672<br>
</span><a href="mailto:jburnett@reedlongyearlaw.com"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#93B479">jburnett@reedlongyearlaw.com</span></a><u><span style="color:blue"><br>
</span></u><a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reedlongyearlaw.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Callred.court%40kingcounty.gov%7C485c2a15f77f4155bef308d639468c12%7Cbae5059a76f049d7999672dfe95d69c7%7C0%7C0%7C636759372492640646&sdata=VVO7PJn1H9mYpJ1TVSKeOTp%2FWmYEkfMWx2SPx7VMKkk%3D&reserved=0"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#93B479">www.reedlongyearlaw.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal"><a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Freedlongyear&data=02%7C01%7Callred.court%40kingcounty.gov%7C485c2a15f77f4155bef308d639468c12%7Cbae5059a76f049d7999672dfe95d69c7%7C0%7C0%7C636759372492640646&sdata=p3G%2F1OTG%2B5tEgygs0u%2FdSyMK9W2W5xFiO6bePiSQ2yc%3D&reserved=0"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848;text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="32" height="32" style="width:.3333in;height:.3333in" id="x_Picture_x0020_2" src="cid:image007.png@01D848D7.C4F5EF10"></span></a><a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FReedLongyear&data=02%7C01%7Callred.court%40kingcounty.gov%7C485c2a15f77f4155bef308d639468c12%7Cbae5059a76f049d7999672dfe95d69c7%7C0%7C0%7C636759372492650651&sdata=QBzKTGCaAitVrliptkbZJ%2FjmRHrv25nGxb5KCSns62A%3D&reserved=0"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848;text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="32" height="32" style="width:.3333in;height:.3333in" id="x_Picture_x0020_3" src="cid:image008.png@01D848D7.C4F5EF10"></span></a><a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2Freed-longyear-malnati-%26-ahrens-pllc&data=02%7C01%7Callred.court%40kingcounty.gov%7C485c2a15f77f4155bef308d639468c12%7Cbae5059a76f049d7999672dfe95d69c7%7C0%7C0%7C636759372492650651&sdata=sJwb2z2gw1HFoVAl1FNDcrEBKcXJVMv9c8s3w%2BlbyOU%3D&reserved=0"><span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848;text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="32" height="32" style="width:.3333in;height:.3333in" id="x_Picture_x0020_4" src="cid:image009.png@01D848D7.C4F5EF10"></span></a><br>
<span style="font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Segoe UI",sans-serif;color:#4E4848">The information in this email message may be privileged and confidential. It is intended only for the use of the recipient named above (or the employee or agent responsible to deliver
it to the intended recipient). If you received this in error, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="xmsonormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>