<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>I like the concept as long as there were some penalty for the
      buyer abusing the process, perhaps similar to the statewide form's
      waiver of inspection contingency provisions.  I don't expect to
      see that out of the legislature though.<br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Kary L. Krismer
206 723-2148</pre>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/13/2022 12:55 PM, Jennifer L White
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:MW4PR14MB46049FF82EFF0A27B3C3A287C0539@MW4PR14MB4604.namprd14.prod.outlook.com">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
      <style>@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:"Script MT Bold";
        panose-1:3 4 6 2 4 6 7 8 9 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:"Arial Rounded MT Bold";
        panose-1:2 15 7 4 3 5 4 3 2 4;}@font-face
        {font-family:Consolas;
        panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}pre
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        margin:0in;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Courier New";}span.HTMLPreformattedChar
        {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
        font-family:Consolas;}span.EmailStyle22
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal">Why don’t they simply legislate a buyer’s
          right to inspect following execution of a PSA (pick a # of
          days) that cannot be waived? Some will use it, some will not.
          Every potential buyer has the opportunity to do it. It seems
          to me that would level the playing field of agents/sellers not
          accepting bids with inspection contingencies.
          <o:p></o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Script MT
              Bold"">Jennifer L. White, Esq.</span>                             
            <span style="font-family:"Script MT Bold""><o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><img
              style="width:1.0958in;height:1.0958in"
              id="Picture_x0020_1"
              src="cid:part1.U4tzPlse.u2wNeOo2@comcast.net" class=""
              width="105" height="105"><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><i><span style="font-family:"Arial
                Rounded MT Bold",sans-serif"><a
                  href="mailto:jen@appletreelaw.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                    style="color:#0563C1;font-style:normal">jen@appletreelaw.com</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></i></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial
              Rounded MT Bold",sans-serif">PO Box 11037<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial
              Rounded MT Bold",sans-serif">Yakima, WA 98909<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Arial
              Rounded MT Bold",sans-serif">509.225.9813<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div>
          <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
            1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com"><wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com></a>
              <b>On Behalf Of </b>Kary Krismer<br>
              <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 13, 2022 12:16 PM<br>
              <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
              <b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] HR 1951--Amendment to Seller
              Disclosure Statement<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <p>Maybe reasonable knowledge?  Someone raised the point of not
          remembering what was in a title report they last saw 20 years
          ago when they bought.  Although I'd question the need for any
          question that is answered on a preliminary commitment, like
          the covenants question.<o:p></o:p></p>
        <p>But again, I'm not really focusing on the liability aspects
          of Form 17 and that relationship to Alejandre v. Bull, etc,
          nor if I were going to change those line of cases would I
          restore negligent misrepresentation.  It would just be the
          actual fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation, and I'm not so
          sure I agree with that change because a weak claim of fraud
          would prevent summary judgment.  I don't mind putting a great
          deal of due diligence on buyers, I just wish more sellers and
          agents would allow that by accepting offers with inspection
          contingencies.  The combined harm of contracts without
          inspection contingencies is probably far greater than the
          combined harm from provable fraudulent activity.<o:p></o:p></p>
        <pre>Kary L. Krismer<o:p></o:p></pre>
        <pre>John L. Scott, Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
        <pre>206 723-2148<o:p></o:p></pre>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">On 1/13/2022 12:06 PM, Catherine Clark
            wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
          <p class="MsoNormal">I think if we remove the term “actual”
            and restore negligent misrepresentation as a claim, that
            would solve the issue you raise.  Yes or no?<o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Catherine
                “Cat” Clark<br>
                Law Office of Catherine C. Clark PLLC</span><o:p></o:p></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">110
                Prefontaine Place South, Ste. 304</span><o:p></o:p></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Seattle,
                WA 98104</span><o:p></o:p></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt">Phone:
                (206) 838-2528<br>
                Cell: (206) 409-8938<br>
                Email: <a href="mailto:cat@loccc.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="color:#0563C1">cat@loccc.com</span></a><br>
              </span><br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <o:p></o:p></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.5pt">NOTICE:
                The information contained in this electronic information
                transmission is confidential. If you are not the
                intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible
                for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
                hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
                distribution or copying of this communication is
                prohibited.  If you received this communication in
                error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone
                at (206) 838-2528. Thank you.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          <div>
            <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
              1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> <a
                  href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">
                  wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <a
                  href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">
                  <wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com></a> <b>On
                  Behalf Of </b>Kary Krismer<br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 13, 2022 7:16 AM<br>
                <b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] HR 1951--Amendment to
                Seller Disclosure Statement<o:p></o:p></p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">If you remove the seller
              knowledge requirements it would be impossible to answer
              “yes” or “no” to the following questions of the
              residential form.<br>
              <br>
              <br>
            </span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">Any of the defect questions
              because there may be defects the seller has not learned
              of.  Actually that is almost certain, most sellers learn a
              lot when they see an inspection report on their own
              property. <br>
              <br>
              <br>
            </span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">1C—Encroachments and boundary
              disputes.  The seller would need to somehow know what
              their neighbors think.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">1E—Easements that affect the
              buyer’s use (since the seller wouldn’t know the buyer’s
              use).</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">1G—Studies that might affect the
              property.  Any number of government agencies could have
              done studies on the area that might somehow affect the
              property.  Even periodic zoning processes might trigger
              that.<br>
              <br>
              <br>
            </span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">3D—Septic questions about
              original permitting and possibly even pumping or
              inspection if the seller didn’t do those.  Also number of
              bathrooms if that wasn’t specified back when the septic
              was put in.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">4B—Has the basement flooded if
              there is no basement.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">4C—Permits if the remodeling was
              done by a prior owner.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">4G—Prior inspections since there
              is no date limitation and would include prior ownership
              periods.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">4J—Basement insulation if there
              is no basement.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">5C—Woodstove certifications if
              the seller wasn’t the purchaser.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">7B—Does the property contain fill
              dirt.  If the seller wasn’t around when the property was
              developed there is no way of knowing that.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">7E—Hazardous substances.  That
              would require extensive testing.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">7F—Has the property been used for
              commercial or industrial purposes.  That would require
              knowledge back to territorial times.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">7G—Soil or groundwater
              contamination.  That would require testing and the
              contamination could be from other properties and totally
              unknown.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">7I—Illegal dumping.  That could
              require knowledge prior to the seller’s ownership.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">7J—Drug manufacturing site.  That
              could require knowledge prior to the seller’s ownership.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">9B—Did prior owners make any
              modifications to a Manufactured Home.  That would require
              knowledge prior to seller’s ownership.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"
            style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
              style="font-size:14.0pt">9C—Were permits obtained for
              those modifications.  Same problem.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
          <pre>Kary L. Krismer<o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre>John L. Scott, Inc.<o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre>206 723-2148<o:p></o:p></pre>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
            <br>
            <o:p></o:p></p>
          <pre>***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
          <pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre>WSBARP mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre><a href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__mailman.fsr.com_mailman_listinfo_wsbarp&d=DwMDaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=kDcM-fraYQNOZ1rCslLoMSSRXJQXmQVvRJbE6ymQGho&m=sNbl8uYa9PyPwBhncHOdQj_oTsxkTXzXb2lKuIIQVfM&s=4OU_3OA3Xspux6j7qI7kuKSRC1FsHwo6TguPcY7Qkig&e=" moz-do-not-send="true">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>