<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Listmates, Once again government delays have created a new question for me. Typically, my developer/builder client forms a new LLC for each project and obtains a contractor’s license for that development. He then hires a range of subcontractor’s
as well as his own employees to complete construction. The normal 2-3 day process of obtaining a contractor’s license is now stretching into weeks. He is losing his weather window for dirt work and my client needs to proceed. We are considering starting
the work with the “ Subcontractor” working for the LLC ( not yet licensed as a contractor) then converting to a true subcontractor once the license is issued, hopefully in a couple days. This would technically make the dirt guy the primary contractor rather
than a sub for those few days. It seems logical and without consequence however, I feel like I am missing something but can’t put my finger on it. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Craig <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>GOURLEY LAW GROUP</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>THE EXCHANGE CONNECTION</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>SNOHOMISH ESCROW </b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">P.O. Box 1091<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Snohomish, WA 98291<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">PH: (360) 568-5065 (800) 291-8401<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Fax: (360) 568-8092 <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain legally privileged, confidential information belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or
entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action based on the contents of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail
in error, please contact sender and delete all copies</span>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>