<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
I recall a court case a few years back that said a change in use requires a much larger percentage (100% ???) Regardless of what the declaration says. Sorry I don't have the cite and who knows maybe it has been overruled by now.
<span id="ms-outlook-android-cursor"></span><br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<span id="OutlookSignature">
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
Get <a href="https://aka.ms/ghei36">Outlook for Android</a></div>
</span><br>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of Patrick McDonald <pmcdonald@podymcdonaldlaw.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, November 4, 2020 4:50:00 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> jeff@bellanddavispllc.com <jeff@bellanddavispllc.com>; WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] Enforcing Amendments to CC & R's</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma}
p.x_MsoNormal, li.x_MsoNormal, div.x_MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
a:link, span.x_MsoHyperlink
{color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline}
span.x_EmailStyle20
{font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext}
.x_MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt}
@page WordSection1
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in}
div.x_WordSection1
{}
-->
</style>
<div lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="x_WordSection1">
<p class="x_MsoNormal">If you are talking about a non-condominium homeowners association, usually the covenants will provide that they can be amended upon approval of a certain percentage owners. You’d think that would be the end of the analysis, but you may
still need 100% approval based on the Supreme Court’s decision in <i>Wilkson v. Chiwawa</i> in 2014. It’s a very fact-specific and subjective analysis.
</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">If the covenants don’t have an amendment provision, then you would need 100% approval.
</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">Patrick McDonald</p>
<div>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><b>_______________________</b></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><b>Pody & McDonald, PLLC</b></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">1200 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1410</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">Seattle, WA 98101-3106</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">T: 206-467-1559</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">F: 206-467-4489</p>
</div>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Jeff Davis<br>
<b>Sent:</b> November 4, 2020 3:11 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [WSBARP] Enforcing Amendments to CC & R's</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">Listmates:</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">Client, HOA, wants to amend CC & R’s. However, before spending the money, the Board wants to know are amendments enforceable? This is always a tricky question. Had one case where HOA wanted to ban Airbnb rentals. However a home owner,
within the association, said they bought the house as an investment and a source for retirement funds. They would not agree with any amendment that stopped them from leasing their home. I know there are cases on rentals, both short term and long term that
deal with this type of amendment. I also know amendments that deal with tree/bush height are causes for big bonfires with the board being burned in effigy. Are there cases out there that acknowledge that most CC & R’s have provision for amendment, and everyone
who buys into the area knows that and are subject to it. Where is the line drawn? What have been your experiences with amending CC & R’s and HOA Bylaws for that matter.</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">Jeff Davis</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif; color:black">W. Jeff Davis, Esq.</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif; color:black">BELL & DAVIS PLLC<br>
P.O. Box 510<br>
Sequim WA 98382<br>
Phone No.:(360) 683.1129 <br>
Fax No.: (360) 683.1258 <br>
email: <a href="mailto:info@bellanddavispllc.com"><span style="color:blue">info@bellanddavispllc.com</span></a><br>
<a href="http://www.bellanddavispllc.com/" target="_blank"><span style="color:blue">www.bellanddavispllc.com</span></a><br>
<br>
The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this
e-mail message in error, please e-mail the sender at <a href="mailto:info@bellanddavispllc.com">
<span style="color:blue">info@bellanddavispllc.com</span></a> or call 360.683.1129</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif"></span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>