<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>My take, unsupported by research:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>John Doe owns Blackacre, and has an appurtenant easement over Whiteacre, and then grants a mortgage to Lender.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Just as John Doe cannot impair Lender’s lien on Blackacre by conveying Blackacre, neither can John Doe impair Lender’s lien on the easement over Whiteacre by unilaterally terminating the easement.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Put another way, John Doe has mortgaged his interest in Whiteacre (an easement); the mortgage will govern how and when the Lender’s rights as to Whiteacre can be eliminated.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>John McCrady<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Counsel<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Puget Sound Title Company<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>5350 Orchard Street West<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>University Place WA 98467<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>253-476-5721<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>j.mccrady@pstitle.com<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Eric Nelsen<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, April 17, 2020 3:22 PM<br><b>To:</b> WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] Extinguishment of easement and effect of security interest<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I agree that mechanically the sheriff's deed or the trustee's deed is likely to list the easement. But if the easement was previously extinguished, I would argue that the deed cannot re-create the easement, because the Deed of Trust can't have a security interest in, or foreclose on, something that doesn't exist. But I guess that also begs the question—I don't know that an extinguishment of an easement, executed by the owner of the encumbered property, is effective. I really think it should be, but I have nothing to back up my opinion.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>If I could rephrase the problem: We generally think of mortgages and DOTs as being secured by land, a chunk of dirt that always exists and always will exist. It can be transferred to someone else but it's easy enough to envision that the security interest "stays" with the land even if the ownership changes.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>But an easement can be "destroyed" by extinguishment in a way that dirt can't. An easement isn't a fee interest and by definition has to be situated <i>outside</i> the boundaries of the dirt that is the main focus of the security interest. The owner of land benefitted by an easement has, so far as I am aware, a unilateral and unlimited right to extinguish an easement that benefits the owner's property. It's not a transfer away, it's a cancellation. And once it's cancelled, there is no easement for the security interest to attach to.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Eric<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Eric C. Nelsen<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Sayre Law Offices, PLLC<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>1417 31st Ave South<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Seattle WA 98144-3909<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>206-625-0092<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='background:aqua;mso-highlight:aqua'>Covid-19 Update - Sayre Law Offices remains available to serve our clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and recommendations of government authority. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we may be of service to you, your family, or your business</span>.<o:p></o:p></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>All attorneys are working remotely during regular business hours and are available via email and by phone; please call the Seattle office. Videoconferencing also is available. Signing of estate planning documents can be completed and will be handled on a case-by-case basis; please call the Seattle office.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>MAIL AND DELIVERIES can be received at the Seattle office. For any other needed arrangements, please call the Seattle office.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Be assured that we will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health emergency.<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Joseph McIntosh<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, April 17, 2020 2:27 PM<br><b>To:</b> WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] Extinguishment of easement and effect of security interest<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>If I understand the question properly, the proposition I think you are looking for is this -- the person auctioning the mortgaged interest, whether a sheriff or trustee, gives the purchaser a deed to that precise interest. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>So, here, the buyer at the foreclosure would acquire the mortgaged interest, to include the easement. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>This is how, mechanically, junior encumbrances are extinguished by senior lien sales. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> [<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Eric Nelsen<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, April 17, 2020 2:16 PM<br><b>To:</b> 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> [WSBARP] Extinguishment of easement and effect of security interest<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>A philosophical question:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>B owns Blackacre, which has an easement appurtenant for a driveway across Whiteacre, owned by W.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>B has a loan, secured by DOT on Blackacre. The DOT's legal description says it covers "Parcel A: Blackacre and Parcel B: Easement for driveway over Whiteacre."<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>W and B execute a document extinguishing the driveway easement over Whiteacre. So, the easement no longer exists.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Then B's lender forecloses on its DOT.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The question: Can the foreclosure "recreate" the easement over Whiteacre? In other words, was the earlier instrument extinguishing the easement ineffective because of the security interest, so that when the lender forecloses on "Blackacre plus easement over Whiteacre," the easement springs back into being?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Related question: Same result if the DOT's legal description just said "Blackacre" and didn't mention the easement appurtenant? Regardless of whether or not an easement appurtenant is mentioned in a deed, it travels with the benefitted land.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Eric<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Eric C. Nelsen<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Sayre Law Offices, PLLC<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>1417 31st Ave South<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Seattle WA 98144-3909<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>206-625-0092<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='background:aqua;mso-highlight:aqua'>Covid-19 Update - Sayre Law Offices remains available to serve our clients and the public during this time, subject to the orders and recommendations of government authority. Please do not hesitate to contact us if we may be of service to you, your family, or your business</span>.<o:p></o:p></b></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='text-align:justify'>All attorneys are working remotely during regular business hours and are available via email and by phone; please call the Seattle office. Videoconferencing also is available. Signing of estate planning documents can be completed and will be handled on a case-by-case basis; please call the Seattle office.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>MAIL AND DELIVERIES can be received at the Seattle office. For any other needed arrangements, please call the Seattle office.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Be assured that we will continue to advise and support our clients throughout this health emergency.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div>
</body></html>