<div style="color:black;font: 10pt Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">My thought is that when someone comes into common ownership, at that point the person can deed out whatever they want, irrespective of where the line might have been
<div>established prior. So the deeds control unless it is pretty clear where the line was on the ground. If it was pretty clear on the ground where the line was intended to be, then I would start looking</div>
<div>at estoppel in pais and location by common grantor. Estoppel can occur by silence. No sure on common grantor. No length of time is required of either. I think if you can establish that it was really </div>
<div>clear to the non-possessing owner what was operating as the line at the time of acquisition, then you have a starting point. If it was not obvious, then I think you have trouble getting there and the</div>
<div>deeds control.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Steve<br>
<br>
<br>
<div style="clear:both">
<div><strong><em>Stephen Whitehouse</em></strong></div>
<div><strong><em>Whitehouse & Nichols, LLP</em></strong></div>
<div><strong><em>P.O. Box 1273</em></strong></div>
<div><strong><em>601 W. Railroad Ave.</em></strong></div>
<div><strong><em>Shelton, Wa. 98584</em></strong></div>
<div><strong><em>360-426-5885<br>
swhite8893@aol.com</em></strong><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica;font-size:10pt;color:black">-----Original Message-----<br>
From: wsbarp-request <wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com><br>
To: wsbarp <wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com><br>
Sent: Tue, Feb 11, 2020 12:00 pm<br>
Subject: WSBARP Digest, Vol 65, Issue 7<br>
<br>
<div dir="ltr">Send WSBARP mailing list submissions to<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-owner@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-owner@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-owner@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">than "Re: Contents of WSBARP digest..."<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Today's Topics:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 1. Adverse possession (J. B. Ransom)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 2. Re: Adverse Possession (Rob Wilson-Hoss)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 3. Re: Adverse Possession (Kary Krismer)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 4. Eviction or Ejectment? Tacoma (Kaitlyn Jackson)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 5. Re: Eviction or Ejectment? Tacoma (Roger Moss)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 6. Grantee in a Common Road / Private Road Easement. (Jamie Morin)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 7. Action against Trustee (Bryce Dille)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 8. Re: Adverse possession (<a ymailto="mailto:nestor@pplsweb.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:nestor@pplsweb.com">nestor@pplsweb.com</a>)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 9. Re: Adverse possession (Kaitlyn Jackson)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 10. Re: Action against Trustee (Andrew Hay)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 11. Re: Action against Trustee (Eric Nelsen)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 12. Re: Action against Trustee (Bryce Dille)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> 13. Re: Action against Trustee (Eric Nelsen)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 1<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:11:20 -0800<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: "J. B. Ransom" <<a ymailto="mailto:jbransom18@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:jbransom18@gmail.com">jbransom18@gmail.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: [WSBARP] Adverse possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <<a ymailto="mailto:CAJpqOLdNkuEbOxf15NNS3zGpQi1SWs4FtmqYL2nSzDxUUzUaBg@mail.gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:CAJpqOLdNkuEbOxf15NNS3zGpQi1SWs4FtmqYL2nSzDxUUzUaBg@mail.gmail.com">CAJpqOLdNkuEbOxf15NNS3zGpQi1SWs4FtmqYL2nSzDxUUzUaBg@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">This seems quite simple. The properties were owned by one party - common<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">owner (CO). CO then deeded one of the two adjoining parcels to A. Then CO<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">deeded the other parcel to B. The legal descriptions in the SW Deeds<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">should tell you what the CO conveyed. Should make no difference how CO<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">acquired title. The party now claiming adverse possession is wrong.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-- <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">J. B. Ransom<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Winslow Law Group, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Seattle office: 206.282.4900<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Bainbridge office: 206.842.3100<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/8776c303/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/8776c303/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 2<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:46:29 -0800<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: "Rob Wilson-Hoss" <<a ymailto="mailto:rob@hctc.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:rob@hctc.com">rob@hctc.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID: <04ea01d5e05b$8d27cfe0$a7776fa0$@hctc.com><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">That?s an interesting thought. Merger requires 1. Coming together of two different estates; and 2. Merger is not contrary to the intention of the party against whom asserted, and not inimical to their interests. Unless the owner of the two lots did not intend merger when the second one was deeded to them, or it was against their interests, then merger. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">As to Randy?s question, maybe merger does apply. It would depend in part on what the person who owned both parcels for four years says about intention and inimicability. OK, so that?s not a word. Maybe it depends on whether they have a dog in this fight, as to what they would say. If they get tendered a claim, they have a dog in the fight, and they may want to say merger was the intention and it was in furtherance of their interests. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Use of they, them and their instead of he or she ? him or her ? his or hers, is still unsettling. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Rob<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Robert D. Wilson-Hoss<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">236 West Birch Street<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Shelton, WA 98584<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">360 426-2999<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">www.hossandwilson-hoss.com<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a ymailto="mailto:rob@hctc.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:rob@hctc.com">rob@hctc.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> On Behalf Of Terrance Wilson<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 4:40 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">doesn't the merger doctrine distinguish this fact pattern from the Gorman case, which dealt with perfecting title prior to being acquired my a municipality? I didn't see merger addressed in the Gorman case anywhere, and the municipality in that case is just like any other owner in that it takes subject to despite it being immune to AP claims after its acquisition. In Gorman, the properties at issue where not owned at any time by the same owner. It seems the merger issue is what needs to be evaluated- maybe I am wrong and merger (as contrasted with municipal acquisition) doesn't extinguish the claim? <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Terrance Randall Wilson, Managing Partner<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Attorney at Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Wilson Law Group of WA<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">(206) 550-3189 - Cell<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">(206) 805-6238 - Office<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> _____ <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> > on behalf of Gregory L. Ursich <<a ymailto="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com">gursich@insleebest.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com">gursich@insleebest.com</a>> ><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 4:06 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> ><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">If the 10 years ran prior to the acquisition of the two properties, then adverse possession is perfected at that time, especially if the two parcels were acquired at different times by the common owner. Gorman states the proposition as that once the 10 years runs, then adverse possession is perfected, and all that left to do is to confirm it by a quiet title action. Read that decision carefully. -Greg Ursich, Inslee Best<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">On Feb 7, 2020, at 3:54 PM, Terrance Wilson <<a ymailto="mailto:Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com">Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com">Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com</a>> > wrote:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">? <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Isn't Gorman dealing with municipalities taking land subject to AP claims already in existence when the government acquires such land? I understood the doctrine of merger to eliminate AP claims when adjoining properties are acquired by the same owner. The 10 years would not therefore start again until there are actually adverse parties again. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Terrance Randall Wilson, Managing Partner<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Attorney at Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Wilson Law Group of WA<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">(206) 550-3189 - Cell<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">(206) 805-6238 - Office<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> _____ <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> > on behalf of Gregory L. Ursich <<a ymailto="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com">gursich@insleebest.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com">gursich@insleebest.com</a>> ><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 3:15 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> ><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Randy: Not quite; if 10 years had ran with the encroachment in place before common ownership, the adverse possession claim would likely survive. See, Gorman v. City ? Woodinville, Wa Supreme Court. -Greg Ursich, Inslee Best<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">On Feb 7, 2020, at 3:08 PM, Randy Boyer <<a ymailto="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com">randyedlynlaw@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com">randyedlynlaw@gmail.com</a>> > wrote:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">? Listmates <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I am dealing with two adjacent parcels. For many years they were owned by different people. Until recently there was no knowledge of an encroachment of a yard area. When one of the parcel owners died, the other owner purchased that property (that encroached). The two parcels were owned by the same owner for 4 years. Then that owner sold each of the parcels in the same year to different parties. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">One of the new owners claims adverse possession for the yard area encroachment. It seems to me that when both lots were owned by one owner the adverse possession claim could no longer be asserted. New owner has only owned for 5 years. Both parcels were sold with Warranty Deeds.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Has anyone run across this? I have not found any cases yet.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Randy<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Randy M. Boyer ______<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Attorney, WSBA# 8665<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Law Office of Randy M. Boyer, Inc. P.S. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">7017 196th St. S.W. Lynnwood, Washington 98036<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">* 425.712.3107| Fax 425.778.2274<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">mail to: <a ymailto="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com">randyedlynlaw@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com">randyedlynlaw@gmail.com</a>> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, and is legally privileged. This email was sent by an attorney or his agent, is intended only for the addressee?s use, and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, reproduction or other use of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender by reply email. Thank you for your cooperation.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">_______________________________________________<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">WSBARP mailing list<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">_______________________________________________<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">WSBARP mailing list<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/2596ea78/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/2596ea78/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 3<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:08:50 -0800<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Kary Krismer <<a ymailto="mailto:Krismer@comcast.net" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Krismer@comcast.net">Krismer@comcast.net</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID: <<a ymailto="mailto:e0149b8d-2062-24c1-ade2-1e286b0d4ec2@comcast.net" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:e0149b8d-2062-24c1-ade2-1e286b0d4ec2@comcast.net">e0149b8d-2062-24c1-ade2-1e286b0d4ec2@comcast.net</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I'm not remembering the facts, but if there was an effective adverse <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">possession period completed, wouldn't the subsequent deeds from the <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">common owner using the original legal descriptions reverse that change <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">in property line (which was presumably never approved by the <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">city/county)?? The owner of both properties transferred deeds away to <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">the specifically described parcels.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Kary L. Krismer<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">206 723-2148<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">On 2/10/2020 1:46 PM, Rob Wilson-Hoss wrote:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> That?s an interesting thought. Merger requires 1. Coming together of <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> two different estates; and 2. Merger is not contrary to the intention <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> of the party against whom asserted, and not inimical to their <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> interests. ?Unless the owner of the two lots did not intend merger <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> when the second one was deeded to them, or it was against their <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> interests, then merger.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> As to Randy?s question, maybe merger does apply. It would depend in <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> part on what the person who owned both parcels for four years says <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> about intention and inimicability. OK, so that?s not a word. Maybe it <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> depends on whether they have a dog in this fight, as to what they <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> would say. If they get tendered a claim, they have a dog in the fight, <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> and they may want to say merger was the intention and it was in <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> furtherance of their interests.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Use of they, them ?and their instead of he or she ? him or her ? his <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> or hers, is still unsettling.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Rob<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Robert D. Wilson-Hoss<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> 236 West Birch Street<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Shelton, WA 98584<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> 360 426-2999<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> www.hossandwilson-hoss.com<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a ymailto="mailto:rob@hctc.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:rob@hctc.com">rob@hctc.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *From:* <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> *On Behalf Of *Terrance Wilson<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2020 4:40 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> doesn't the merger doctrine distinguish this fact pattern from the <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Gorman case, which dealt with perfecting title prior to being acquired <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> my a municipality?? I didn't see merger addressed in the Gorman case <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> anywhere, and the municipality in that case is just like any other <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> owner in that it takes subject to despite it being immune to AP claims <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> after its acquisition. In Gorman, the properties at issue where not <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> owned at any time by the same owner.? It seems the merger issue is <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> what needs to be evaluated- maybe I am wrong and merger (as contrasted <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> with municipal acquisition) doesn't extinguish the claim?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Terrance Randall Wilson, Managing Partner<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Attorney at Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *Wilson Law Group of WA*<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> (206) 550-3189 - Cell<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> (206) 805-6238 - Office<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *From:*<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>> on behalf of Gregory L. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Ursich <<a ymailto="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com">gursich@insleebest.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com">gursich@insleebest.com</a>>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2020 4:06 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> If the 10 years ran prior to the acquisition of the two properties, <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> then adverse possession is perfected at that time, especially if the <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> two parcels were acquired at different times by the common owner. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Gorman states the proposition as that once the 10 years runs, then <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> adverse possession is perfected, and all that left to do is to confirm <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> it by a quiet title action. Read that decision carefully. -Greg <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Ursich, Inslee Best<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Sent from my iPhone<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> On Feb 7, 2020, at 3:54 PM, Terrance Wilson<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <<a ymailto="mailto:Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com">Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com">Twilson@wilsonlawgroupwa.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Isn't Gorman dealing with municipalities taking land subject to AP<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> claims already in existence when the government acquires such<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> land?? I understood the doctrine of merger to eliminate AP claims<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> when adjoining properties are acquired by the same owner.? The 10<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> years would not therefore start again until there are actually<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> adverse parties again.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Terrance Randall Wilson, Managing Partner<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Attorney at Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *Wilson Law Group of WA*<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> (206) 550-3189 - Cell<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> (206) 805-6238 - Office<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *From:*<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>> on behalf of Gregory<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> L. Ursich <<a ymailto="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com">gursich@insleebest.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:gursich@insleebest.com">gursich@insleebest.com</a>>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *Sent:* Friday, February 7, 2020 3:15 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Randy: Not quite; if 10 years had ran with the encroachment in<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> place before common ownership, the adverse possession claim would<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> likely survive. See, Gorman v. City ? Woodinville, Wa Supreme<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Court. -Greg Ursich, Inslee Best<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Sent from my iPhone<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> On Feb 7, 2020, at 3:08 PM, Randy Boyer<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <<a ymailto="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com">randyedlynlaw@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com">randyedlynlaw@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ? Listmates<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> I am dealing with two adjacent parcels. ?For many years they<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> were owned by different people. ?Until recently there was no<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> knowledge of an encroachment of a yard area. ?When one of the<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> parcel owners died, the other owner purchased that property<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> (that encroached). ?The two parcels were owned by the same<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> owner for 4 years. ?Then that owner sold each of the parcels<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> in the same year to different parties.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> One of the new owners claims adverse possession for the yard<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> area encroachment. ?It seems to me that when both lots were<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> owned by one owner the adverse possession claim could no<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> longer be asserted. ?New owner has only owned for 5 years.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ?Both parcels were sold with Warranty Deeds.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Has anyone run across this? ?I have not found any cases yet.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Randy<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> *_Randy M. Boyer ? ? ? _______*<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Attorney, WSBA# 8665<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Law Office of Randy M. Boyer, Inc. P.S.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> 7017 196th St. S.W. ?Lynnwood, Washington 98036<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> (425.712.3107| ??Fax 425.778.2274<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> mail to:<a ymailto="mailto:__randyedlynlaw@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:__randyedlynlaw@gmail.com">__randyedlynlaw@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:randyedlynlaw@gmail.com">randyedlynlaw@gmail.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, and is legally privileged.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> This email was sent by an attorney or his agent, is intended<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> only for the addressee?s use, and may contain confidential and<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination,<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> reproduction or other use of the information contained in this<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> by reply email. Thank you for your cooperation.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> in related fields, and others.***<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> _______________________________________________<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> WSBARP mailing list<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields,<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> and others.***<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> _______________________________________________<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> WSBARP mailing list<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> _______________________________________________<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> WSBARP mailing list<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/18967a26/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/18967a26/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 4<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:16:55 -0800<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Kaitlyn Jackson <<a ymailto="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com">kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: [WSBARP] Eviction or Ejectment? Tacoma<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <CAO+<a ymailto="mailto:NF_4Ob_fNtzLeamNNA-sdr4Hi4_zBnCh3n3prPJGG0MJcEg@mail.gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:NF_4Ob_fNtzLeamNNA-sdr4Hi4_zBnCh3n3prPJGG0MJcEg@mail.gmail.com">NF_4Ob_fNtzLeamNNA-sdr4Hi4_zBnCh3n3prPJGG0MJcEg@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Private PSA of mixed use residential and commercial property in Tacoma. One<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">of the residential units is occupied by the "handyman" on the property who<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">no longer does any "handyman" work. There's no written lease agreement or<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">any written agreement whatsoever. Rent was basically his handyman work. The<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">previous owner was afraid to try to evict him when he refused to pay rent<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">or continue his handyman services because previous owner claims she was<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">afraid of him. Previous owner will not cooperate. People go in and out of<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">the place at all hours and there's a some belief by new owner that handyman<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">is dealing drugs (no proof).<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eviction or ejectment?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-- <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Thank you,<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">t: *206.973.3500 *| f: *206.577.5090*| e: *<a ymailto="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com">kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com</a>*|<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">www.dimensionlaw.com<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-- <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:??This e-mail (including any attachments) is <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination, <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines, <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone; <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">and electronic copies.?Any settlement offer contained herein is made <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">the part of this firm?s client(s) or its agents.??IRS?CIRCULAR?230 <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">DISCLAIMER:??To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/b21b39fb/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/b21b39fb/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 5<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:29:29 -0800<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Roger Moss <<a ymailto="mailto:ram@pacific-ci.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:ram@pacific-ci.com">ram@pacific-ci.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Eviction or Ejectment? Tacoma<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID: <<a ymailto="mailto:4C9117D1-58B5-4D2E-85BF-A133453EF0A0@pacific-ci.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:4C9117D1-58B5-4D2E-85BF-A133453EF0A0@pacific-ci.com">4C9117D1-58B5-4D2E-85BF-A133453EF0A0@pacific-ci.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eviction, which you should avoid. Pay occupant to leave. Use a mediator.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Roger A. Moss, Esq. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Pacific Conflict Intervention<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">206.790.1971 Seattle<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">415.371.9724 San Francisco<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">www.pacific-ci.com<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Confidentiality Notice: The information in this e-mail (including attachments, if any) is considered confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by reply email, delete this email, and do not disclose its contents to anyone. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> On Feb 10, 2020, at 2:16 PM, Kaitlyn Jackson <<a ymailto="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com">kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Private PSA of mixed use residential and commercial property in Tacoma. One of the residential units is occupied by the "handyman" on the property who no longer does any "handyman" work. There's no written lease agreement or any written agreement whatsoever. Rent was basically his handyman work. The previous owner was afraid to try to evict him when he refused to pay rent or continue his handyman services because previous owner claims she was afraid of him. Previous owner will not cooperate. People go in and out of the place at all hours and there's a some belief by new owner that handyman is dealing drugs (no proof). <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Eviction or ejectment? <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> -- <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Thank you,<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Kaitlyn R. Jackson | Attorney| DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> t: 206.973.3500? <>| f: 206.577.5090 <>| e: <a ymailto="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com">kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com</a> <>| www.dimensionlaw.com <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://www.dimensionlaw.com/">http://www.dimensionlaw.com/</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines, imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone; return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper and electronic copies. Any settlement offer contained herein is made pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on the part of this firm?s client(s) or its agents. IRS!<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> _______________________________________________<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> WSBARP mailing list<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/077a10f9/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/077a10f9/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 6<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 23:17:30 +0000<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Jamie Morin <<a ymailto="mailto:morin@confluencelaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:morin@confluencelaw.com">morin@confluencelaw.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: "<a ymailto="mailto:REALPROP@yahoogroups.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:REALPROP@yahoogroups.com">REALPROP@yahoogroups.com</a>" <<a ymailto="mailto:REALPROP@yahoogroups.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:REALPROP@yahoogroups.com">REALPROP@yahoogroups.com</a>>, "'Listserve<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> WSBARRPT (<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>)'" <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: [WSBARP] Grantee in a Common Road / Private Road Easement.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <<a ymailto="mailto:MWHPR22MB0605686BD38F7B1E18231727A8190@MWHPR22MB0605.namprd22.prod.outlook.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:MWHPR22MB0605686BD38F7B1E18231727A8190@MWHPR22MB0605.namprd22.prod.outlook.com">MWHPR22MB0605686BD38F7B1E18231727A8190@MWHPR22MB0605.namprd22.prod.outlook.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I'm looking for some thoughts on how to describe the grantee in an easement agreement:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Collection of 20+/- homes on the coast. Only one access road into the community from County Highway. Current access road is increasingly unstable. Property owner adjacent to the existing main access is willing to sell an easement which will allow for the access road to be moved to more solid ground. How should the grantee be memorialized on the easement?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Finding one common grantee seems out of the question:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Once upon a time, there was an HOA but went bankrupt and was administratively dissolved 20 years about after protracted infighting and litigation.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">A collection of the property owners are coming together to purchase the easement and repair the road for the collective good, but this collection is not all the property owners and is not formally organized. Can this be an unincorporated association and called out as such in and easement or will this cause the easement to fail because the grantee isn't a corporate entity?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Or can the easement be one easement granted to multiple grantees<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">or does there need to be an easement recorded for the benefit of each of the properties?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Thanks in advance.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Jamie Morin | Attorney at Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">[<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://htmlsigs.s3.amazonaws.com/logos/files/001/140/508/landscape/ConfluenceLaw-Final-h.png">https://htmlsigs.s3.amazonaws.com/logos/files/001/140/508/landscape/ConfluenceLaw-Final-h.png</a>]<<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://htmlsig.com/t/000001ES87DN">https://htmlsig.com/t/000001ES87DN</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Direct: (206)502-4405 | Cell: (206)498-2381<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">(509)295-WLAW | <a ymailto="mailto:morin@confluencelaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:morin@confluencelaw.com">morin@confluencelaw.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:morin@confluencelaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:morin@confluencelaw.com">morin@confluencelaw.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">110 Prefontaine Pl. S., Suite 304, Seattle, WA 98104<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">505 W Riverside Ave., Suite 505, Spokane, WA 99201<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Name: winmail.dat<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Type: application/ms-tnef<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Size: 14639 bytes<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Desc: not available<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/3c4bf36e/winmail-0001.dat">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/3c4bf36e/winmail-0001.dat</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 7<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 01:09:14 +0000<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Bryce Dille <<a ymailto="mailto:Bryce@dillelaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Bryce@dillelaw.com">Bryce@dillelaw.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <<a ymailto="mailto:DM6PR11MB365881529983D9E01D920CC4C8180@DM6PR11MB3658.namprd11.prod.outlook.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:DM6PR11MB365881529983D9E01D920CC4C8180@DM6PR11MB3658.namprd11.prod.outlook.com">DM6PR11MB365881529983D9E01D920CC4C8180@DM6PR11MB3658.namprd11.prod.outlook.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I have a client that has a claim against a trustee who distributed assets to himself in violation of the trust terms. The trustee died and my client (a successor beneficiary) filed a claim in the trustees estate which claim has been rejected. My question what governs the action should this be a Tedra proceeding or a civil action against the trustees estate for damages. Thanks<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Bryce H. Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Dille Law, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Office: 360-350-0270<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Cell: 253-579-5561<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business Entity Creation and Management<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business, Government and Tax Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/0162a1d4/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/0162a1d4/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 8<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 18:33:34 -0800<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <<a ymailto="mailto:nestor@pplsweb.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:nestor@pplsweb.com">nestor@pplsweb.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Adverse possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID: <003e01d5e083$a8d0c710$fa725530$@pplsweb.com><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I agree.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Nestor Gorfinkel, Attorney at Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Licensed in Washington & Florida<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Florida Civil-Law (International) Notary<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">ATTENTION - This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at the phone numbers provided herein and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> On Behalf Of J. B. Ransom<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 1:11 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: [WSBARP] Adverse possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">This seems quite simple. The properties were owned by one party - common owner (CO). CO then deeded one of the two adjoining parcels to A. Then CO deeded the other parcel to B. The legal descriptions in the SW Deeds should tell you what the CO conveyed. Should make no difference how CO acquired title. The party now claiming adverse possession is wrong.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-- <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">J. B. Ransom<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Winslow Law Group, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Seattle office: 206.282.4900<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Bainbridge office: 206.842.3100<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/21f34d68/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/21f34d68/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 9<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:36:49 -0800<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Kaitlyn Jackson <<a ymailto="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com">kaitlyn@dimensionlaw.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Adverse possession<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID: <<a ymailto="mailto:E3580977-B6B5-4045-BBD2-5CDBD5D950A8@dimensionlaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:E3580977-B6B5-4045-BBD2-5CDBD5D950A8@dimensionlaw.com">E3580977-B6B5-4045-BBD2-5CDBD5D950A8@dimensionlaw.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I agree.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPhone<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> On Feb 10, 2020, at 1:13 PM, J. B. Ransom <<a ymailto="mailto:jbransom18@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:jbransom18@gmail.com">jbransom18@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> This seems quite simple. The properties were owned by one party - common owner (CO). CO then deeded one of the two adjoining parcels to A. Then CO deeded the other parcel to B. The legal descriptions in the SW Deeds should tell you what the CO conveyed. Should make no difference how CO acquired title. The party now claiming adverse possession is wrong.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> -- <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> J. B. Ransom<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Winslow Law Group, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Seattle office: 206.282.4900<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> Bainbridge office: 206.842.3100<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> _______________________________________________<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> WSBARP mailing list<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-- <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:??This e-mail (including any attachments) is <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination, <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines, <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone; <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">and electronic copies.?Any settlement offer contained herein is made <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">the part of this firm?s client(s) or its agents.??IRS?CIRCULAR?230 <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">DISCLAIMER:??To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein. <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 10<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:21:55 +0000<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Andrew Hay <<a ymailto="mailto:andrewhay@washingtonlaw.net" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:andrewhay@washingtonlaw.net">andrewhay@washingtonlaw.net</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <<a ymailto="mailto:MWHPR1301MB1933E6C88889275F7B85FD49B2180@MWHPR1301MB1933.namprd13.prod.outlook.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:MWHPR1301MB1933E6C88889275F7B85FD49B2180@MWHPR1301MB1933.namprd13.prod.outlook.com">MWHPR1301MB1933E6C88889275F7B85FD49B2180@MWHPR1301MB1933.namprd13.prod.outlook.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I would use TEDRA on this. It has a broad statement of intent and applicability in .010 and .020 so you know the court will be able to handle any aspect of the case, often via motion or petition to a court commissioner.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Andrew Hay<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Hay & Swann PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">201 S. 34th St.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Tacoma, WA 98418<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">www.washingtonlaw.net<<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://www.washingtonlaw.net/">http://www.washingtonlaw.net/</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a ymailto="mailto:andrewhay@washingtonlaw.net" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:andrewhay@washingtonlaw.net">andrewhay@washingtonlaw.net</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:andrewhay@washingtonlaw.net" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:andrewhay@washingtonlaw.net">andrewhay@washingtonlaw.net</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">253.272.2400 (w)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">253.377.3085 (c)<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION AND IS INTENDED FOR THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT ONLY. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY AND DESTROY ALL COPIES<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> On Behalf Of Bryce Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 5:09 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I have a client that has a claim against a trustee who distributed assets to himself in violation of the trust terms. The trustee died and my client (a successor beneficiary) filed a claim in the trustees estate which claim has been rejected. My question what governs the action should this be a Tedra proceeding or a civil action against the trustees estate for damages. Thanks<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Bryce H. Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Dille Law, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Office: 360-350-0270<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Cell: 253-579-5561<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business Entity Creation and Management<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business, Government and Tax Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/4a988ca3/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/4a988ca3/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 11<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:40:04 +0000<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Eric Nelsen <<a ymailto="mailto:Eric@sayrelawoffices.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Eric@sayrelawoffices.com">Eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <<a ymailto="mailto:57DC2058F333E340877E55171112778441ADAFEE@SBS2011.SayreLawOffices.local" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:57DC2058F333E340877E55171112778441ADAFEE@SBS2011.SayreLawOffices.local">57DC2058F333E340877E55171112778441ADAFEE@SBS2011.SayreLawOffices.local</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Hmmm....I hate these dilemmas. I make these decisions now simply by proceeding exactly as I would if the defendant were still alive, but substitute the defendant's Estate in the caption. I don't think the law is intended to change the procedure needed to pursue a cause of action based on whether the defendant is alive or dead.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">The courts are apparently okay with either, even if you make the wrong decision, so long as you commence a timely action in a court with subject matter jurisdiction. See Estate of Berry, 189 Wn.App. 368, 358 P.3d 426 (2015). Berry appears to hold that a creditor's lawsuit must be filed as an ordinary civil action and not under TEDRA. But, it was harmless error to file it as a TEDRA action since the superior court was the proper court with subject matter jurisdiction, and the creditor filed the action within the 30-day period (on day 29).<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">In your case, TEDRA might conceivably still be the appropriate procedure for the action against the trustee. In Berry the creditor's claim was based on a breach of contract-decedent had failed to maintain certain real property as required under a written contract. That claim is clearly an ordinary civil action if it were between two living people.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">In your case, however, the basic cause of action relates to misfeasance of a trustee, which arguably could be a TEDRA matter. If the trustee was still alive, I think the beneficiary could possibly sue the trustee under TEDRA. However, I think this kind of action is also a poor fit for TEDRA. The definition of "matter" in TEDRA, RCW 11.96A.030(2)<<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=11.96A&full=true#11.96A.030">https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=11.96A&full=true#11.96A.030</a>>, appears intended to deal more with matters "internal" to administration of the trust, and is not really meant to take over the standard form of lawsuit for torts such as breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, constructive trust, etc. I think a regular lawsuit is probably more appropriate.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">One question I have though is, who is the proper plaintiff. The distribution was taken from the trust, so it seems to me the plaintiff should be the successor trustee of the trust, with a direct cause of action for damages, or for constructive trust to recover assets from, the defendant (former) trustee.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">But if your client is not successor trustee, but only a trust beneficiary-is their action more like a shareholder derivative action, bringing suit on behalf of all beneficiaries, and naming the trust as a nominal defendant as well as the trustee individually?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sincerely,<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eric<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eric C. Nelsen<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sayre Law Offices, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">1417 31st Ave South<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Seattle WA 98144-3909<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">206-625-0092<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a ymailto="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> On Behalf Of Bryce Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 5:09 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I have a client that has a claim against a trustee who distributed assets to himself in violation of the trust terms. The trustee died and my client (a successor beneficiary) filed a claim in the trustees estate which claim has been rejected. My question what governs the action should this be a Tedra proceeding or a civil action against the trustees estate for damages. Thanks<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Bryce H. Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Dille Law, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Office: 360-350-0270<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Cell: 253-579-5561<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business Entity Creation and Management<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business, Government and Tax Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/8d296117/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/8d296117/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 12<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:52:33 +0000<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Bryce Dille <<a ymailto="mailto:Bryce@dillelaw.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Bryce@dillelaw.com">Bryce@dillelaw.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <<a ymailto="mailto:DM6PR11MB36582A6CAB66014C37643DA3C8180@DM6PR11MB3658.namprd11.prod.outlook.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:DM6PR11MB36582A6CAB66014C37643DA3C8180@DM6PR11MB3658.namprd11.prod.outlook.com">DM6PR11MB36582A6CAB66014C37643DA3C8180@DM6PR11MB3658.namprd11.prod.outlook.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">That was my thinking client is trust beneficiary. The claim was rejected because trustee's estate claims the 3 year statute of limitation applies since this was only asset of the trust that was taken out of trust and therefore they are claiming trust terminated and the 3 year period began when asset transferred although the trust by its terms had a minimum 10 year period of distributions and trustee conveyed all assets within first 3years of ten year period my client was unaware of the distribution until after trustee died. Fortunately the trustee held title in his own name until death and did not sell earlier.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> On Behalf Of Eric Nelsen<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 10:40 AM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Hmmm....I hate these dilemmas. I make these decisions now simply by proceeding exactly as I would if the defendant were still alive, but substitute the defendant's Estate in the caption. I don't think the law is intended to change the procedure needed to pursue a cause of action based on whether the defendant is alive or dead.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">The courts are apparently okay with either, even if you make the wrong decision, so long as you commence a timely action in a court with subject matter jurisdiction. See Estate of Berry, 189 Wn.App. 368, 358 P.3d 426 (2015). Berry appears to hold that a creditor's lawsuit must be filed as an ordinary civil action and not under TEDRA. But, it was harmless error to file it as a TEDRA action since the superior court was the proper court with subject matter jurisdiction, and the creditor filed the action within the 30-day period (on day 29).<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">In your case, TEDRA might conceivably still be the appropriate procedure for the action against the trustee. In Berry the creditor's claim was based on a breach of contract-decedent had failed to maintain certain real property as required under a written contract. That claim is clearly an ordinary civil action if it were between two living people.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">In your case, however, the basic cause of action relates to misfeasance of a trustee, which arguably could be a TEDRA matter. If the trustee was still alive, I think the beneficiary could possibly sue the trustee under TEDRA. However, I think this kind of action is also a poor fit for TEDRA. The definition of "matter" in TEDRA, RCW 11.96A.030(2)<<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=11.96A&full=true#11.96A.030">https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=11.96A&full=true#11.96A.030</a>>, appears intended to deal more with matters "internal" to administration of the trust, and is not really meant to take over the standard form of lawsuit for torts such as breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, constructive trust, etc. I think a regular lawsuit is probably more appropriate.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">One question I have though is, who is the proper plaintiff. The distribution was taken from the trust, so it seems to me the plaintiff should be the successor trustee of the trust, with a direct cause of action for damages, or for constructive trust to recover assets from, the defendant (former) trustee.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">But if your client is not successor trustee, but only a trust beneficiary-is their action more like a shareholder derivative action, bringing suit on behalf of all beneficiaries, and naming the trust as a nominal defendant as well as the trustee individually?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sincerely,<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eric<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eric C. Nelsen<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sayre Law Offices, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">1417 31st Ave South<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Seattle WA 98144-3909<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">206-625-0092<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a ymailto="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>> On Behalf Of Bryce Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 5:09 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I have a client that has a claim against a trustee who distributed assets to himself in violation of the trust terms. The trustee died and my client (a successor beneficiary) filed a claim in the trustees estate which claim has been rejected. My question what governs the action should this be a Tedra proceeding or a civil action against the trustees estate for damages. Thanks<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Bryce H. Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Dille Law, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Office: 360-350-0270<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Cell: 253-579-5561<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business Entity Creation and Management<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business, Government and Tax Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/467643cd/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/467643cd/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message: 13<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 19:51:12 +0000<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: Eric Nelsen <<a ymailto="mailto:Eric@sayrelawoffices.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Eric@sayrelawoffices.com">Eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Message-ID:<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <<a ymailto="mailto:57DC2058F333E340877E55171112778441ADB150@SBS2011.SayreLawOffices.local" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:57DC2058F333E340877E55171112778441ADB150@SBS2011.SayreLawOffices.local">57DC2058F333E340877E55171112778441ADB150@SBS2011.SayreLawOffices.local</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> <br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I think that S/L defense is garbage unless there are other facts suggesting client knew or should have known about the improper transfer.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">The S/L under RCW 11.96A.070(c) doesn't apply to constructive trusts (see subsec. d), so a cause of action for constructive trust over a specific misappropriated asset is not extinguished, and the discovery rule delaying accrual of a cause of action applies to constructive trust based on fraud/intentional breach of fiduciary duties.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I would also argue that if a fiduciary steals the last asset of a trust, the trust does not terminate. Instead, its remaining "asset" is the cause of action against the trustee, for recovery of the asset. That is the whole point of constructive trust-a fiduciary can't terminate a trust simply by misappropriating its assets; instead, the assets automatically become subject to a constructive trust for the true beneficiaries, and the trustee liable for any loss.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Under the circumstances it sounds to me like the constructive trust theory is most likely to succeed, especially when it's based on intentional fraud as here.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sincerely,<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eric<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eric C. Nelsen<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sayre Law Offices, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">1417 31st Ave South<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Seattle WA 98144-3909<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">206-625-0092<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a ymailto="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> On Behalf Of Bryce Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 10:53 AM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">That was my thinking client is trust beneficiary. The claim was rejected because trustee's estate claims the 3 year statute of limitation applies since this was only asset of the trust that was taken out of trust and therefore they are claiming trust terminated and the 3 year period began when asset transferred although the trust by its terms had a minimum 10 year period of distributions and trustee conveyed all assets within first 3years of ten year period my client was unaware of the distribution until after trustee died. Fortunately the trustee held title in his own name until death and did not sell earlier.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>> On Behalf Of Eric Nelsen<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 10:40 AM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Hmmm....I hate these dilemmas. I make these decisions now simply by proceeding exactly as I would if the defendant were still alive, but substitute the defendant's Estate in the caption. I don't think the law is intended to change the procedure needed to pursue a cause of action based on whether the defendant is alive or dead.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">The courts are apparently okay with either, even if you make the wrong decision, so long as you commence a timely action in a court with subject matter jurisdiction. See Estate of Berry, 189 Wn.App. 368, 358 P.3d 426 (2015). Berry appears to hold that a creditor's lawsuit must be filed as an ordinary civil action and not under TEDRA. But, it was harmless error to file it as a TEDRA action since the superior court was the proper court with subject matter jurisdiction, and the creditor filed the action within the 30-day period (on day 29).<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">In your case, TEDRA might conceivably still be the appropriate procedure for the action against the trustee. In Berry the creditor's claim was based on a breach of contract-decedent had failed to maintain certain real property as required under a written contract. That claim is clearly an ordinary civil action if it were between two living people.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">In your case, however, the basic cause of action relates to misfeasance of a trustee, which arguably could be a TEDRA matter. If the trustee was still alive, I think the beneficiary could possibly sue the trustee under TEDRA. However, I think this kind of action is also a poor fit for TEDRA. The definition of "matter" in TEDRA, RCW 11.96A.030(2)<<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=11.96A&full=true#11.96A.030">https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=11.96A&full=true#11.96A.030</a>>, appears intended to deal more with matters "internal" to administration of the trust, and is not really meant to take over the standard form of lawsuit for torts such as breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, constructive trust, etc. I think a regular lawsuit is probably more appropriate.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">One question I have though is, who is the proper plaintiff. The distribution was taken from the trust, so it seems to me the plaintiff should be the successor trustee of the trust, with a direct cause of action for damages, or for constructive trust to recover assets from, the defendant (former) trustee.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">But if your client is not successor trustee, but only a trust beneficiary-is their action more like a shareholder derivative action, bringing suit on behalf of all beneficiaries, and naming the trust as a nominal defendant as well as the trustee individually?<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sincerely,<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eric<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Eric C. Nelsen<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sayre Law Offices, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">1417 31st Ave South<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Seattle WA 98144-3909<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">206-625-0092<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a ymailto="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:eric@sayrelawoffices.com">eric@sayrelawoffices.com</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">From: <a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>> On Behalf Of Bryce Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 5:09 PM<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><mailto:<a ymailto="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Subject: [WSBARP] Action against Trustee<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">I have a client that has a claim against a trustee who distributed assets to himself in violation of the trust terms. The trustee died and my client (a successor beneficiary) filed a claim in the trustees estate which claim has been rejected. My question what governs the action should this be a Tedra proceeding or a civil action against the trustees estate for damages. Thanks<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Bryce H. Dille<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Dille Law, PLLC<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Office: 360-350-0270<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Cell: 253-579-5561<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">** Please note that I use the dictation feature of my iPhone and that sometimes everything I say does not get properly translated**<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business Entity Creation and Management<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Business, Government and Tax Law<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">-------------- next part --------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">URL: <<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/c9878578/attachment-0001.html">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200211/c9878578/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">_______________________________________________<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">WSBARP mailing list<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a ymailto="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">End of WSBARP Digest, Vol 65, Issue 7<br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">*************************************<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>