<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large;color:#351c75">Sangeeta,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large;color:#351c75"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large;color:#351c75">Do you happen to have a cite for this case? In our HOA, we have a 30% rental cap. The building across the street has no rental cap; consequently, most of the units are rentals and you have to be a full cash buyer as lenders won't lend on the individual condos. <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large;color:#351c75"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large;color:#351c75">Lisa<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM <<a href="mailto:wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Send WSBARP mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:wsbarp-owner@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-owner@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of WSBARP digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Condo rental (Sangeeta Saigal)<br>
2. Re: Condo rental (Bryce Dille)<br>
3. Re: Condo rental (Paul Neumiller)<br>
4. Re: Decree of Diss. with common address - title company<br>
response (Bryce Dille)<br>
5. Re: Decree of Diss. with common address - title company<br>
response (John McCrady)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:58:55 +0000<br>
From: Sangeeta Saigal <<a href="mailto:attorney@sangeetasaigal.com" target="_blank">attorney@sangeetasaigal.com</a>><br>
To: "<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>" <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
Subject: [WSBARP] Condo rental<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:F3D084B6-6BDB-4718-955F-75F8A58D580B@sangeetasaigal.com" target="_blank">F3D084B6-6BDB-4718-955F-75F8A58D580B@sangeetasaigal.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Good Morning,<br>
<br>
Would very much appreciate assistance with the following:<br>
<br>
A condo association in King County is stating that only 12 units can be a rental on the property. If all slots are full then the owners need to wait until a slot opens. <br>
<br>
I believe there was a Supreme Court decision recently that ruled that HOA?s cannot limit owners rights to their property in this manner.<br>
<br>
Am I right? Any other guidance on this issue?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Sangeeta<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:12:15 +0000<br>
From: Bryce Dille <<a href="mailto:Bryce@dillelaw.com" target="_blank">Bryce@dillelaw.com</a>><br>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Condo rental<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:MWHPR11MB156531692106C678AE736603C89F0@MWHPR11MB1565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com" target="_blank">MWHPR11MB156531692106C678AE736603C89F0@MWHPR11MB1565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com</a>><br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
The case you are referring to had to do with whether rent restriction was properly adopted and the court said it is proper to have a rent restriction if in the original condo declaration but if not the rent restrictions could only be imposed by an amendment to the declaration passed in accordance with the voting requirement of the declaration and the condo act which applied at that time RCW 64.34 etr seq<br>
<br>
Bryce H. Dille?|?Attorney at Law<br>
Dille Law, PLLC<br>
P:?360-350-0270 |?F:?844-210-4503<br>
2010 Caton Way SW, Suite 101<br>
Olympia, Washington 98502<br>
<a href="http://www.dillelaw.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.dillelaw.com</a><br>
<br>
This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s).? If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.?<br>
<br>
Business Entity Creation and Management<br>
Business, Government and Tax Law<br>
Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> On Behalf Of Sangeeta Saigal<br>
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 5:59 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
Subject: [WSBARP] Condo rental<br>
<br>
Good Morning,<br>
<br>
Would very much appreciate assistance with the following:<br>
<br>
A condo association in King County is stating that only 12 units can be a rental on the property. If all slots are full then the owners need to wait until a slot opens. <br>
<br>
I believe there was a Supreme Court decision recently that ruled that HOA?s cannot limit owners rights to their property in this manner.<br>
<br>
Am I right? Any other guidance on this issue?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Sangeeta<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
<br>
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
WSBARP mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:20:34 +0000<br>
From: Paul Neumiller <<a href="mailto:pneumiller@hotmail.com" target="_blank">pneumiller@hotmail.com</a>><br>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Condo rental<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:MWHPR11MB1597CFCD9A49C32034665DFFD29F0@MWHPR11MB1597.namprd11.prod.outlook.com" target="_blank">MWHPR11MB1597CFCD9A49C32034665DFFD29F0@MWHPR11MB1597.namprd11.prod.outlook.com</a>><br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
FILMORE LLLP, a Washington limited liability limited partnership, Respondent,<br>
v.<br>
UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRE POINTE CONDOMINIUM, a Washington<br>
nonprofit miscellaneous corporation, Appellant.????<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
IMPORTANT NOTICE:? This e-mail message is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive the confidential information it may contain. E-mail messages to clients of Paul A. Neumiller presumptively contain information that is confidential and legally privileged; e-mail messages to non-clients are normally confidential and may also be legally privileged. Please do not read, copy, forward or store this message unless you are the intended recipient of it. If you have received this message in error, please forward it back to the sender and delete it completely from your computer system.<br>
<br>
E-mail communication on the Internet may NOT be secure. There is a risk that this confidential communication may be intercepted illegally. There may also be a risk of waiving attorney-client and/or work-product privileges that may attach to this communication. DO NOT forward this message to a third party. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the sender.<br>
?<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> On Behalf Of Sangeeta Saigal<br>
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 5:59 AM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
Subject: [WSBARP] Condo rental<br>
<br>
Good Morning,<br>
<br>
Would very much appreciate assistance with the following:<br>
<br>
A condo association in King County is stating that only 12 units can be a rental on the property. If all slots are full then the owners need to wait until a slot opens. <br>
<br>
I believe there was a Supreme Court decision recently that ruled that HOA?s cannot limit owners rights to their property in this manner.<br>
<br>
Am I right? Any other guidance on this issue?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Sangeeta<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
<br>
<br>
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
WSBARP mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<a href="https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.fsr.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fwsbarp&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb7a1d6e8f7bb4e6d740d08d748024fa5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637057047064794684&sdata=Ni6XVyCjgKj5Ijv41NeMv05jlw4Egy%2Bu489RSMNEUTk%3D&reserved=0" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.fsr.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fwsbarp&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cb7a1d6e8f7bb4e6d740d08d748024fa5%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637057047064794684&sdata=Ni6XVyCjgKj5Ijv41NeMv05jlw4Egy%2Bu489RSMNEUTk%3D&reserved=0</a><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: Paul A Neumiller.vcf<br>
Type: text/x-vcard<br>
Size: 34670 bytes<br>
Desc: Paul A Neumiller.vcf<br>
URL: <<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/4eb458e8/PaulANeumiller-0001.vcf" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/4eb458e8/PaulANeumiller-0001.vcf</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:22:15 +0000<br>
From: Bryce Dille <<a href="mailto:Bryce@dillelaw.com" target="_blank">Bryce@dillelaw.com</a>><br>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Decree of Diss. with common address - title<br>
company response<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:MWHPR11MB1565338829B4A2677334A98EC89F0@MWHPR11MB1565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com" target="_blank">MWHPR11MB1565338829B4A2677334A98EC89F0@MWHPR11MB1565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com</a>><br>
<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
My experience is no it will require either an amended decree with the legal in it or a quitclaim deed from one spouse to the other using the excise tax exemption of "pursuant to dissolution decree"<br>
<br>
Bryce H. Dille | Attorney at Law<br>
Dille Law, PLLC<br>
P: 360-350-0270 | F: 844-210-4503<br>
2010 Caton Way SW, Suite 101<br>
Olympia, Washington 98502<br>
<a href="http://www.dillelaw.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.dillelaw.com</a><<a href="http://www.dillelaw.com/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.dillelaw.com/</a>><br>
<br>
This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.<br>
<br>
Business Entity Creation and Management<br>
Business, Government and Tax Law<br>
Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> On Behalf Of Josh Grant<br>
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 11:17 AM<br>
To: wsbar <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
Subject: [WSBARP] Decree of Diss. with common address - title company response<br>
<br>
I have a client who is selling her house. The title shows to H&W. Decree of dissolution awarded it to client but they used a common address and not a legal address in the decree.<br>
Will most title companies be satisfied with that?<br>
Joshua F. Grant<br>
[advocates]<br>
P. O. Box 619<br>
Wilbur, WA 99185<br>
509 647 5578<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/f6b1aea0/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/f6b1aea0/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: image001.png<br>
Type: image/png<br>
Size: 7674 bytes<br>
Desc: image001.png<br>
URL: <<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/f6b1aea0/image001-0001.png" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/f6b1aea0/image001-0001.png</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 5<br>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 09:27:54 -0700<br>
From: John McCrady <<a href="mailto:j.mccrady@pstitle.com" target="_blank">j.mccrady@pstitle.com</a>><br>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Decree of Diss. with common address - title<br>
company response<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<<a href="mailto:A8106026B40C9544A17DC5E44A2003EE02306858F432@PSTMAILV.pstitle.com" target="_blank">A8106026B40C9544A17DC5E44A2003EE02306858F432@PSTMAILV.pstitle.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Absent unusual circumstances, I would accept the decree as sufficient to pass title.<br>
<br>
John McCrady<br>
Counsel<br>
Puget Sound Title Company<br>
5350 Orchard Street West<br>
University Place WA 98467<br>
253-476-5721<br>
<a href="mailto:j.mccrady@pstitle.com" target="_blank">j.mccrady@pstitle.com</a><br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>] On Behalf Of Josh Grant<br>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2019 11:17 AM<br>
To: wsbar <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
Subject: [WSBARP] Decree of Diss. with common address - title company response<br>
<br>
I have a client who is selling her house. The title shows to H&W. Decree of dissolution awarded it to client but they used a common address and not a legal address in the decree.<br>
Will most title companies be satisfied with that?<br>
Joshua F. Grant<br>
[cid:image001.png@01D579CC.D5F79700]<br>
P. O. Box 619<br>
Wilbur, WA 99185<br>
509 647 5578<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/868fa24e/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/868fa24e/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: image001.png<br>
Type: image/png<br>
Size: 7674 bytes<br>
Desc: image001.png<br>
URL: <<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/868fa24e/image001-0001.png" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191003/868fa24e/image001-0001.png</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
WSBARP mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
<br>
End of WSBARP Digest, Vol 61, Issue 3<br>
*************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><font size="2" face="monospace,monospace"><span style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><span><span style="background-color:rgb(53,28,117)"><span style="background-color:rgb(238,238,238)"></span></span></span></span><span style="background-color:rgb(238,238,238)"><i><br></i></span></font></div><div><span style="color:rgb(53,28,117)"><font size="4"><font face="monospace,monospace"><font size="2"><span style="background-color:rgb(238,238,238)"><i><font size="4">Estate planning and settlement, trusts, real estate and non-immigrant visas</font></i></span><br></font></font></font></span></div><div><font size="4"><span style="color:rgb(53,28,117)"><font face="monospace,monospace">206.569.8838</font></span></font><b><font size="4"><font face="monospace,monospace"><font size="2"><br></font></font></font></b><span style="background-color:rgb(243,243,243)"><span></span></span><br><p style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)">This electronic mail transmission and any accompanying documents
contain information belonging to the sender which may be confidential
and legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity to whom this electronic mail transmission was
sent as indicated above. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the
contents of the information contained in this transmission is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
delete the message. Thank you.</span><span style="color:rgb(31,73,125)"></span></span></p><p style="background:white none repeat scroll 0% 0%"><b><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)"> </span></span></b></p><span style="font-family:monospace,monospace"><span style="font-size:11pt;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><b>Circular
230 Disclaimer</b>. Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this
communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to
be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties
under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed
herein.</span></span></div><div><font size="4"><font face="monospace,monospace"><br></font></font></div><font size="4"><font face="monospace,monospace"></font></font></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>