<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Helvetica;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \, serif";
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
punctuation-wrap:simple;
text-autospace:none;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:black;
position:relative;
top:2.5pt;
mso-text-raise:-2.5pt;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
p.MsoNoSpacing, li.MsoNoSpacing, div.MsoNoSpacing
{mso-style-priority:1;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:black;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-style-priority:99;
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle23
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle25
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle26
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle27
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle28
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle29
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:windowtext'>One other piece: they have to leave the property in good condition to get the money. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'>Robert D. Wilson-Hoss <br>Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP <br>236 West Birch Street <br>Shelton, WA 98584 <br>360 426-2999<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other'><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'><a href="www.hossandwilsonhoss.com">www.hossandwilson-hoss.com</a><br><a href="mailto:rob@hctc.com">rob@hctc.com</a></span><span style='color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other'><span style='color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging'><i><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'>This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed above) and immediately delete this message and any and all of its attachments. Thank you.<o:p></o:p></span></i></p><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other'><span style='color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:windowtext;text-transform:uppercase;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'>This office does debt collection and this e-mail may be an attempt to collect a debt, Any information obtained will be used for that purpose. </span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'>To the extent the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692) applies this firm is acting as a debt collector for the condominium/homeowners' association named above to collect a debt owed to it. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes. You have the right to seek advice of legal counsel.</span><span style='color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:14.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other'><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext;position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'> wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Robert R. Cole<br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, June 07, 2018 3:00 PM<br><b>To:</b> wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p>That's why I advise my clients to start by waving some $100 bills in the tenants' face and tell them the money is theirs if they move within a couple days, and if they don't the money will be given to the lawyer.<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Very Truly Yours,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Robert R. Cole<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Law Office of Cole & Gilday, P.C. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>10101 - 270th St. NW <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Stanwood, WA 98292 <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>(360) 629-2900 (Telephone) <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>(360) 629-0220 (Fax) <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>This message contains confidential and privileged information that is intended only for the named recipient(s). Unless you are the named recipient or authorized agent thereof, you are prohibited from reading, copying, distributing or otherwise disseminating such information. If you receive this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other'><span style='position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'>On 6/7/2018 1:26 PM, HOWARD HERMAN wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Doug, </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>And after all that, you probably wound up with an uncollectable judgment. I have one landlord lawyer who never asks for anything except an order terminating the tenancy and granting the writ. The tenants readily sign off on such an order. It was a few experiences like you describe that led him to convince his landlords that getting the property back and eating the costs and his fee was just the cost of doing business and the sooner he gets the property back the sooner he is back in business. What is that old saying, “A bad settlement is better than a good lawsuit.” At least you know what the result is going to be. We had a judge years ago who would get counsel in chambers and try to get them to settle by saying, “A lawsuit is like squeezing an orange. You never know which way it will spurt”.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Howard Herman</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Herman Herman and Jolley PS</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>509 220 5810</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a name="_MailEndCompose"><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span></a><o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> [<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Douglas W. Scott<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 6, 2018 9:45 AM<br><b>To:</b> WSBA Real Property Listserv<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'>Howard, It sounds like you are diligent. My client, who only had one rental, failed to do a background check. I looked the tenants name up on King County’s website to immediately see that the tenant had gone through a UD complaint just the year before. The landlord had attempted to reason with the tenant for months to pay rent or move out. Then the tenant hide from service. Tenant knew how to use the system and got a pro bono lawyer from the Northwest Justice Project. We ended up going to court in downtown Seattle twice and had to await long calendars. Cost the landlord a bunch of lost rents (he had an underlying mortgage) and costs and attorney fees. I would think that a quick search of the courts website may disclose a UD history of these guys in most cases. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>Douglas W. Scott</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>Law Offices of Douglas W. Scott</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>Windermere Building</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>1810 15th Place NW, Suite 203<br>Issaquah, Washington, 98027<br>V. 425.392.8550<br>F. 425-392-2829 </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'><a href="http://www.davisscottlaw.com/">www.davisscottlaw.com</a></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> [<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>HOWARD HERMAN<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 06, 2018 9:22 AM<br><b>To:</b> 'WSBA Real Property Listserv'<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Doug, that is a good point and the ones that come through the volunteer office are screened. However, when the defendants appear on the unlawful detainer docket and you see them for the first time for only a few minutes, there is no opportunity to screen and you just have to shoot from the hip. However, if they appear to have a valid defense I can usually get a continuance which allows me to do the necessary background check. The docket can be anywhere from one to as many as fifteen cases and if I am the only volunteer that day there is no time to do any screening. This is a fault of our system. We should have internet access to the files when the docket is made up which would give the volunteer a week or so to get familiar with the cases, do some discovery and be semi prepared when the docket is called. We have been promised this for several years, but it hasn’t happened yet. Sometimes I get a heads up from the volunteer office about a case on the upcoming docket and the office has the ability to copy a file and email it to me. That has proved to be a great help. We just keep doing the best we can under the circumstances.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Howard Herman</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Herman Herman and Jolley PS</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>509 220 5810 </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> [<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Douglas W. Scott<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 6, 2018 8:04 AM<br><b>To:</b> WSBA Real Property Listserv<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'>Howard, I do have one request when you represent pro bono tenants: please screen them so as not to represent a tenant who purposely goes from landlord to landlord and fails to pay rent awaiting the landlord to eventually evict them and then gets a pro bono lawyer to locate a technicality that sends the landlord back to court multiple times, plus expenses to the Sheriff, and costs the landlord (who may be a working class guy with one rental unit) thousands of dollars. Then the tenant leaves the place a complete mess. </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>Douglas W. Scott</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>Law Offices of Douglas W. Scott</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>Windermere Building</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>1810 15th Place NW, Suite 203<br>Issaquah, Washington, 98027<br>V. 425.392.8550<br>F. 425-392-2829 </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:windowtext'><a href="http://www.davisscottlaw.com/">www.davisscottlaw.com</a></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:windowtext'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> [<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>HOWARD HERMAN<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, June 05, 2018 7:43 PM<br><b>To:</b> 'WSBA Real Property Listserv'<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Kary, thank you so much!</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>This is a beautiful case and right here in my own back yard, Spokane WA, Division III. My practice is primarily limited to pro bono defense of unlawful detainer cases and this case is a primer for anyone representing either the landlord or the tenant. I am familiar with many of the cases cited in the opinion, and to have so many issues so clearly and decisively decided in one case is remarkable. At least half of the cases I have handled in the last 20 years could have been won with this case as authority. Landlords, beware of the volunteer that comes to court with one case.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Howard Herman</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Herman Herman and Jolley PS</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>509 220 5810</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext'> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> [<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Kary Krismer<br><b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, June 5, 2018 8:52 AM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p>I haven't been following this thread, but this new case seems to be on-topic.<o:p></o:p></p><p><a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/351378_pub.pdf">http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/351378_pub.pdf</a><o:p></o:p></p><pre>Kary L. Krismer<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>John L. Scott/KMS Renton <o:p></o:p></pre><pre>206 723-2148<o:p></o:p></pre><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 6/4/2018 4:49 PM, HOWARD HERMAN wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>Craig, here is the case law and statute.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>In <i>Carlstrom,</i> Division One of this court observed, "Show cause hearings are summary proceedings to determine the issue of possession <i>pending</i> a lawsuit." <i>Id.</i> at 788, </span><a href="http://lawriter.net/getCitState.aspx?series=P.2d&citationno=990+P.2d+986&scd=WA" target="_self"><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:#1E3C73;text-decoration:none'>990 P.2d 986</span></a><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> (emphasis added) (citing <i>Meadow Park,</i> 54 Wash.App. at 375, </span><a href="http://lawriter.net/getCitState.aspx?series=P.2d&citationno=773+P.2d+875&scd=WA" target="_self"><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:#1E3C73;text-decoration:none'>773 P.2d 875</span></a><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>). The statute allows a landlord to apply for a writ to expeditiously determine who should possess the property while an unlawful detainer action is pending. <i>Meadow Park,</i> 54 Wash.App. at 376, </span><a href="http://lawriter.net/getCitState.aspx?series=P.2d&citationno=773+P.2d+875&scd=WA" target="_self"><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:#1E3C73;text-decoration:none'>773 P.2d 875</span></a><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>. In fact, since a pendente lite writ issues on summary proceedings, the landlord is typically required to post a bond <sup>[<a href="http://lawriter.net/caselink.aspx?series=P.3d&scd=WA&citationno=109%20P.3d%20422#FN3"><span style='color:#1E3C73;text-decoration:none'>3</span></a><a name=ftn.FN3></a>]</sup> to take possession. RCW 59.18.380. That is because "[a] show cause hearing is not the final determination of the rights of the parties in an unlawful detainer action." <i>Carlstrom,</i> 98 Wash.App. at 788, </span><a href="http://lawriter.net/getCitState.aspx?series=P.2d&citationno=990+P.2d+986&scd=WA" target="_self"><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:#1E3C73;text-decoration:none'>990 P.2d 986</span></a><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>.</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Howard Herman</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Herman Herman & Jolley PS</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>509 220 5810</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> [<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Craig Gourley<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, June 4, 2018 8:37 AM<br><b>To:</b> WSBA Real Property Listserv<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thank you all for your insight. I know in Snoco, the commissioners have made it pretty clear that they won’t grant a judgment if the tenant has vacated. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com"><wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com></a> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Paul Neumiller<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 1, 2018 4:14 PM<br><b>To:</b> WSBA Real Property Listserv <a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com"><wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com></a><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><div id=divtagdefaultwrapper><p>Craig, I read the statute differently from the other listserv members. I have had tenants move out after service of the summons and complaint but before the show cause hearing. When I informed the judge at the show cause hearing that the T had moved out, the judge basically tossed the file aside and said "next". Then I pointed out to the judge that while it was no longer necessary to obtain a Writ of Restitution, T still met the definition of being in unlawful detainer because T was in possession of the premises past the expiration of the 3 day notice and so the LL was still entitled to a judgement. The judge frowned but signed the judgement.<o:p></o:p></p><p> <o:p></o:p></p><p>RCW 59.12.030 says that the "<span style='font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"'>tenant of real property for a term less than life is guilty of unlawful detainer either: ...</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"'>3) When he or she continues in possession in person or by subtenant after a default in the payment of rent, and after notice in writing requiring in the alternative the payment of the rent or the surrender of the detained premises, served (in manner in RCW </span><span style='font-size:12.0pt'><a href="http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=59.12.040"><b><span style='font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:#7DAB8A'>59.12.040</span></b></a></span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"'> provided) in behalf of the person entitled to the rent upon the person owing it, has remained uncomplied with for the period of three days after service thereof. The notice may be served at any time after the rent becomes due."</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.25in'><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.25in'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif"'>I would argue that if T stays in the premises for ANY TIME after the 3 day notice has expired (and service of the summons and complaint), then T is "guilty of unlawful detainer." But, I guess it comes down to what does "continues in possession" mean? I have successfully argued that LL is still entitled to a judgment because the T is "guilty of unlawful detainer" even though T has vacated the premises. The section says it's unlawful detainer if T continues in possession after the end of the 3 day period, it doesn't say that T must STAY in the premises past the expiration of the 3 day notice and until the Show Cause Hearing. No, I do not have case law to back it up but that's my story and I'm sticking to it. </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.25in'><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:.25in'><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;position:relative;top:-2.5pt;mso-text-raise:2.5pt'><hr size=3 width="98%" align=center></span></div><div id=divRplyFwdMsg><p class=MsoNormal><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> <<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>> on behalf of Craig Gourley <<a href="mailto:craig@glgmail.com">craig@glgmail.com</a>><br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 1, 2018 3:04 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br><b>Subject:</b> [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment<span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Listmates, I know that when a tenant vacates the property priortothe show cause, the UD action is no longer valid and tje action must be converted to a money due or breach suit if you want a judgment. What I don't know is the cite for why that is true. Anyone know the cite for this? Also does it only apply to residential or is it the same for commercial? Thanks in advance for your wisdom. </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div id="x_composer_signature"><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;color:#575757'>Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman , serif","serif"'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>WSBARP mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><o:p></o:p></pre></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman , serif","serif"'> </span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'><br><br><br><o:p></o:p></span></p><pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>WSBARP mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><o:p></o:p></pre></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal style='punctuation-wrap:hanging;text-autospace:ideograph-numeric ideograph-other'><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";position:relative;top:0pt;mso-text-raise:0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></body></html>