<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;background-color:#FFFFFF;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Listmates</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I have a PC that held a second position and was the successful bidder in the non-judicial foreclosure. I am looking for a case (which I could not find) or your thoughts based on the following facts and issue:</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<ul>
<li>building comprised of 3 lots</li><li>security given for two of the three parcels (oversight by PC)</li><li>Title show PC as secured for all parcels</li><li>Security for $700K, parcels with sec'ty interest worth about $100K (over securitized)<br>
</li><li>Surplus funds $115K</li><li>other parcel worth $500K </li><li>Judgment creditor in picture over $300K<br>
</li></ul>
<div>Does PC keep surplus? Any case? Direction/Thoughts. I could not find any case law with this issue, although I found a UT casse suggesting that PC would get to keep all (no apportionment based on FMV of the parcels)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thank you.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Roberto H. Castro </p>
<div id="Signature">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt; color:#000000; background-color:#FFFFFF; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<div style="margin:0px; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" name="divtagdefaultwrapper">
<div>Attorney</div>
<div>Law Office of Roberto H. Castro, PLLC</div>
<div>P.O. Box 747 </div>
<div>312 E Trow Avenue</div>
<div>Chelan, WA 98816</div>
<div>Direct: (509) 679-3668</div>
<div>Fax: (509) 266-7104</div>
<div><a tabindex="-1" id="LPNoLP">www.rcastrolaw.com</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><i><font color="#0000ff" size="2"><b>"A Law Firm Serving Washington State's Emerging and Established Businesses, Families, Individuals and Exempt Organizations holding the Certified Valuation Analyst (CVA) and Certified Machinery & Equipment Appraiser
(CMEA) professional designations."</b></font></i></div>
<font size="2"></font>
<div><i><br>
<font size="2"></font></i></div>
<font size="2"></font>
<div><font size="2"><b>IRS Circular 230 Notice</b>. To ensure compliance with U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advise contained in this communication, including any attachments, is not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be use, for the purposes of (i) avoiding any penalties under U.S. federal tax laws, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. </font></div>
<font size="2"></font>
<div><br>
<font size="2"></font></div>
<font size="2"></font>
<div><font size="2"><b>Confidentiality Notice</b>: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute, or take action in reliance upon
this message. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive the Attorney-Client privilege or work-product privilege
by the transmission of this message.</font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>