<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">CIR law is a bit of a thicket. To start out, cribbed from a fantastic quickcite compendium that Doug Becker maintains on the family law listserve:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">“We conclude that the equitable doctrine of CIR is subject to a three-year statute of limitations. A party must sue to establish that the relationship existed within three years of the end of the relationship.”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:#1F497D">In re Matter of Kelley</span></u><span style="color:#1F497D">, 170 Wn. App. 722, 737, 287 P.3d 12 (2012),
<u>review denied</u>, 176 Wn.2d 1018, 297 P.3d 706 (2013)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">“In deciding whether the parties had a committed intimate relationship, courts consider several nonexclusive factors, none of which necessarily has more significance than another: (1) continuity of cohabitation;
(2) duration of the relationship; (3) purpose of the relationship; (4) pooling of resources and services for joint projects; and (5) the intent of the parties.
<u>Pennington</u>, 142 Wn.2d at 601-05. Courts should not apply these factors in a hypertechnical fashion, but must base the determination on the particular circumstances of each case.
<u>Pennington</u>, 142 Wn.2d at 602.”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:#1F497D">In re Marriage of Byerley</span></u><span style="color:#1F497D">, 183 Wn. App. 677, 686, 334 P.3d 108 (2014);
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:#1F497D">Pennington v. Pennington</span></u><span style="color:#1F497D">, 142 Wn.2d 592, 601, 14 P.3d 764 (2000);
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:#1F497D">Connell v. Francisco</span></u><span style="color:#1F497D">, 127 Wn.2d 339, 346, 898 P.2d 831 (1995)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">“[W]e hold that [a committed, intimate] relationship cannot in any event commence prior to the date the parties begin living together. Precedent establishes cohabitation as a sine qua non of a committed intimate
relationship: A committed intimate relationship requires by definition that ‘both parties cohabit with knowledge that a lawful marriage between them does not exist.’
<u>Connell</u>, 127 Wn.2d at 346 (emphasis added).”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:#1F497D">In re Marriage of Byerley</span></u><span style="color:#1F497D">, 183 Wn. App. 677, 689, 334 P.3d 108 (2014);
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:#1F497D">Connell v. Francisco</span></u><span style="color:#1F497D">, 127 Wn.2d 339, 346, 898 P.2d 831 (1995)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">“A meretricious relationship is a stable, marital-like relationship where both parties cohabit with knowledge that a lawful marriage between them does not exist.
<u>In re Marriage of Lindsey</u>, 101 Wash.2d 299, 304, 678 P.2d 328 (1984); Harry M. Cross,
<u>Community Property Law in Washington</u> (Revised 1985), 61 Wash.L.Rev. 13, 23 (1986).”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:#1F497D">Connell v. Francisco</span></u><span style="color:#1F497D">, 127 Wn.2d 339, 346, 898 P.2d 831, 127 Wn.2d 339 (1995)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Re inheritance issues, see<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span style="color:#1F497D">Drown v. Boone (Langeland Estate)</span></u><span style="color:#1F497D">, 177 Wn.App. 315, 312 P.3d 657 (Div. 1 2013),<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D">Eric<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D">Eric C. Nelsen<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D">SAYRE LAW OFFICES, PLLC<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D">1320 University St<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D">Seattle WA 98101-2837<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D">phone 206-625-0092<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:#1F497D">fax 206-625-9040<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Justin Monro<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:27 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [WSBARP] Case Law on CIR-Comm. Prop.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Listmates:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I represent an estate. Father died no will, he wasn’t married. I name one of the adult children as PR.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Care taker filed complaint against estate claiming through Committed Intimate Relationship and RCW 11.96A that she is entitled to all of the community property from the estate.
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is there any case law on this that someone can share or point me too. Thank you!<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Justin K. Monro<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Attorney at Law<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Monro Law Firm P.S. Inc.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">1830 Bickford Ave. Ste 204<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Snohomish, WA 98290<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">P:360.863.3728<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">F:360.863.3985<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This e-mail message contains information belonging to The Monro Law Firm P.S. Inc. which may be privileged, confidential and/or protected from disclosure. The information is intended only for the use of the individual
or entity named above. If you think that you have received this message in error, please contact the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>