<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif">If you are looking for an UD/writ, isn't that outside any provisions on how disputes are to be resolved in general?<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif">Seems to me no different than how the UD statute trumps a general right to litigate. To me I'd read the contractual clause just dictating the "form" of a general claim. <br><br>But I do not believe you can contractually circumvent the UD statute in general, correct, for the limited purposes of the writ? (not having the statute in front of me) Which would serve to benefit the landlord in this case if they are seeking an UD in the normal judicial fashion.<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif">If you are talking about damages beyond getting T's out (which it doesn't sound like?) then it would work like any other arbitration & entry of the judgment. <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif">Unless I misunderstood something ...</span><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"></span><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><font face="trebuchet ms,sans-serif" size="2"><br></font></div><div><font face="trebuchet ms,sans-serif" size="2">Carmen Rowe</font></div><div><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2"><i>Attorney / Owner<br></i></font></div><div><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2"><br></font></div><div><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2"><img src="https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B-SsegebS6iBcmI1cnhVMkR1TVk&revid=0B-SsegebS6iBOU5rSTZoTlMxTHlldFlnL09nTTNPT2FtMjFZPQ" height="60" width="200"></font></div></div><div dir="ltr"><font face="Trebuchet MS" size="2"><br></font></div><div dir="ltr"><font style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" face="Trebuchet MS" color="#660000" size="2">1121 Harrison Ave. No. 280 - Centralia, WA 98531</font></div><div><font style="background-color:rgb(255,255,255)" face="Trebuchet MS" color="#660000" size="2">Phone: (360) 669-3576</font></div><div><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="#660000" size="2">Email: Carmen@GryphonLawGroup.com<br><br></font></div><div><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="#660000" size="2"><i>Contact us for information on Olympia and Seattle locations.</i><br></font></div><div><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="#660000" size="2"><br></font></div><div><font face="Trebuchet MS" color="#444444" size="1"><b>Privileged and confidential: </b>This message is confidential, and we thank you for your respect in not sharing this email with anyone other than the person to whom it is addressed;and if you received it by accident, deleting it and disregarding any information it contains.</font></div><font face="Trebuchet MS"><div><br></div></font><div dir="ltr"><font face="Trebuchet MS"></font></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:00 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com" target="_blank">wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Send WSBARP mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-request@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:wsbarp-owner@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-owner@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of WSBARP digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. UD and Mandatory Meditation/Arbitration (Paul Neumiller)<br>
2. Re: UD and Mandatory Meditation/Arbitration (Bryce Dille)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:09:50 -0800<br>
From: Paul Neumiller <<a href="mailto:pneumiller@hotmail.com">pneumiller@hotmail.com</a>><br>
To: <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
Subject: [WSBARP] UD and Mandatory Meditation/Arbitration<br>
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP111A623488F5FA75F16B77D2280@phx.gbl><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
Saw a new LL client whose lease, lo and behold, calls for mediation and then<br>
arbitration for when "a dispute arises out of or relates to this contract,<br>
or the breach thereof" using the local Dispute Resolution Center. And<br>
then, "judgement upon the Award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered on<br>
any court having jurisdiction thereof."<br>
<br>
The meth head tenants are LL/T law savvy ("you can't kick us out until the<br>
sheriff comes") and couldn't care less if there is a judgment lien against<br>
them. Anyone have this before? I doubt the local DRC has the power to<br>
issue an Order for Writ of Restitution. Any argument that this provision<br>
does not leave the LL with an adequate remedy? Thanks (and happy Friday).<br>
Paul Neumiller<br>
<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20151106/08cfbc72/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20151106/08cfbc72/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 23:23:37 +0000<br>
From: Bryce Dille <<a href="mailto:BryceD@cdb-law.com">BryceD@cdb-law.com</a>><br>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <<a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] UD and Mandatory Meditation/Arbitration<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<B3982DA158E09443BF4EE7AD2BB5825727F729C0@CDBS-SBS.cdb-law.local><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br>
<br>
I think the arbitrators award could provide in the final award that upon request to superior crt the crt will enter a writ of restitution directed to the sheriff to evict tenant.<br>
<br>
This transmission contains confidential attorney-client communications and may not be disclosed to any person but the intended recipient(s). If this matter is transmitted to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.<br>
<br>
Bryce H. Dille<br>
Campbell, Dille, Barnett & Smith, PLLC<br>
P.O. Box 488<br>
Puyallup, WA 98371<br>
Voice: <a href="tel:253.848.3513" value="+12538483513">253.848.3513</a><br>
Fax: <a href="tel:253.845.4941" value="+12538454941">253.845.4941</a><br>
<a href="mailto:bryced@cdb-law.com">bryced@cdb-law.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:bryced@cdb-law.com">bryced@cdb-law.com</a>><br>
<br>
Business Entity Creation and Management<br>
Business, Government and Tax Law<br>
Real Estate and Land Use, Residential, Commercial and Condominium Development<br>
Real Estate and Commercial Transactions & Closings, Including Performing Services as IRS Section 1031 Exchange Facilitator<br>
Estate Planning, including Wills and Trusts, and Probate Administration<br>
Representation Homeowners/Condominium Association Real Estate Developments<br>
Real Property Foreclosures and Forfeitures<br>
<br>
From: <a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com</a>] On Behalf Of Paul Neumiller<br>
Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 3:10 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com">wsbarp@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
Subject: [WSBARP] UD and Mandatory Meditation/Arbitration<br>
<br>
Saw a new LL client whose lease, lo and behold, calls for mediation and then arbitration for when "a dispute arises out of or relates to this contract, or the breach thereof" using the local Dispute Resolution Center. And then, "judgement upon the Award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered on any court having jurisdiction thereof."<br>
The meth head tenants are LL/T law savvy ("you can't kick us out until the sheriff comes") and couldn't care less if there is a judgment lien against them. Anyone have this before? I doubt the local DRC has the power to issue an Order for Writ of Restitution. Any argument that this provision does not leave the LL with an adequate remedy? Thanks (and happy Friday). Paul Neumiller<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20151106/8f386303/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20151106/8f386303/attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
WSBARP mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com">WSBARP@lists.wsbarppt.com</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp</a><br>
<br>
End of WSBARP Digest, Vol 14, Issue 3<br>
*************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>