<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
</head><body>
<p>Does anyone know of any case law support for the proposition that an adverse possession action between two neighbors will not eliminate an easement across the disputed property that benefits a third neighbor who is not party to the lawsuit? Seems to me that the victor in the adverse possession action would have to quiet title by showing abandonment of the easement?<br /></p>
<p class="io-ox-signature">Scott G. Thomas<br />Law Office of Scott G. Thomas<br />1204 Cleveland Avenue<br />Mount Vernon, WA 98273<br />(360) 503-1042<br />www.scottgthomaslaw.com<br /><br />Because this is a communication from a lawyer, it necessarily contains warnings such as this. I am a lawyer, but unless we have entered into an agreement for legal services, I am not your lawyer. And, if this message was intended for someone else but you have inadvertently received it, I ask that you delete the message and let me know you received it so that I can take steps to make sure you do not receive messages in the future. Thank you.</p>
</body></html>