[WSBARP] DOT Survived after BK
Mike Zeno
mikez at zenolawfirm.com
Wed Mar 4 15:55:11 PST 2026
Eric--Speaking as Tim’s proxy, I will answer yes to your questions, with the exception that if the statute of limitations for foreclosing were to run shortly after the bankruptcy filing, the time to commence foreclosure would be extended until the automatic stay went away. This typically occurs at discharge, which is usually only a few months after filing in a normal Chapter 7.
Mike
The Law Office of G. Michael Zeno, Jr., P.S.
T: (425) 947-8050 F: (425) 947-8052
135 Lake Street S., Suite 257
Kirkland, WA 98033
Confidential/Privileged Communication: This email and any attachments are confidential, privileged and intended only for the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this email is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify me immediately so we can arrange for the message and documents to be returned and deleted. Thank you.
IRS Circular 230 Disclaimer: Any tax advice provided in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by the recipient or any other taxpayer (i) for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the recipient or any other taxpayer, or (ii) in promoting, marketing or recommending to another party a partnership or other entity, investment plan, arrangement or other transaction. You should seek advice based on your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Eric Nelsen
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2026 3:30 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] DOT Survived after BK
If I can jump in and also ask Tim - Even though bankruptcy discharge blocks personal liability, would the statute of limitations still run on the debt in the ordinary fashion? So, if the S/L has passed on the underlying debt, could the Deed of Trust be cancelled by quiet title under RCW 7.28.300?
Anticipating this is a 30-year installment debt, let’s say the statute has run on 12 years’ worth of payments. Does that reduce the principal amount for which the DOT can still be foreclosed?
Sincerely,
Eric
Eric C. Nelsen
Sayre Law Offices, PLLC
1417 31st Ave South
Seattle WA 98144-3909
206-625-0092
eric at sayrelawoffices.com<mailto:eric at sayrelawoffices.com>
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Kevin Bukoskey
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2026 3:23 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] DOT Survived after BK
Okay, thanks Tim. So, basically, there is no way to remove the DOT from title or from the risk of future foreclosure? Even though it's been ~18 years since his last payment?
Kevin A. Bukoskey, Esq., JD, MBA
Attorney
GOURLEY LAW GROUP
THE EXCHANGE CONNECTION
SNOHOMISH ESCROW
P.O. Box 1091
Snohomish, WA 98291
PH: (360) 568-5065 (800) 291-8401
Fax: (360) 568-8092
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain legally privileged, confidential information belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action based on the contents of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error, please contact sender and delete all copies.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> on behalf of Timothy Steen <tsteen at andersonhunterlaw.com<mailto:tsteen at andersonhunterlaw.com>>
Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2026 at 3:08 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] DOT Survived after BK
Kevin,
A bankruptcy generally does not discharge a valid deed of trust, absent avoidance or similar special proceedings in the bankruptcy. If the debtor received a discharge, that eliminates the debtor’s personal liability. Meanwhile, the lender can still foreclose the trust lien to satisfy the indebtedness. The client will likely have to handle the deed of trust as it would any other trust lien.
Thanks,
Tim
[A black sign with white text Description automatically generated]
Timothy E. Steen
Attorney | Anderson Hunter Law Firm
2707 Colby Avenue #1001 | Everett, WA 98201
P. (425) 252-5161 | D. (425) 303-3125 | F. (425) 258-3345
tsteen at andersonhunterlaw.com<mailto:tsteen at andersonhunterlaw.com>| www.andersonhunterlaw.com<http://www.andersonhunterlaw.com/>
This email message may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax issues in this e-mail is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by you, (a) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (b) to promote, market or recommend to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. We do not accept service of any kind by e-mail unless expressly authorized in writing by the attorney of record. E-mail communications are not intended to create contracts or CR 2A agreements. All such agreements must be signed by the attorney of record. Thank you.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Kevin Bukoskey
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2026 2:40 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] DOT Survived after BK
Hi Listmates,
I have a new client who owns a property and had a Note/DOT. During “The Great Recession”, he claimed BK, included the loan, and never made any payments again and has not heard anything back from the lender either way.
Recently, he pulled a title report, and it seems that the DOT survived and was not stripped in the BK.
When this happens, from a title standpoint, would you expect a quiet title to remove the DOT, or is this something that has to be done via a court order in BK court?
Thanks.
Kevin A. Bukoskey, Esq., JD, MBA
Attorney
GOURLEY LAW GROUP
THE EXCHANGE CONNECTION
SNOHOMISH ESCROW
P.O. Box 1091
Snohomish, WA 98291
PH: (360) 568-5065 (800) 291-8401
Fax: (360) 568-8092
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain legally privileged, confidential information belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action based on the contents of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error, please contact sender and delete all copies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20260304/f48577e7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 25021 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20260304/f48577e7/image001.png>
More information about the WSBARP
mailing list