[WSBARP] Covenant

Randy Boyer randyedlynlaw at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 14:50:03 PDT 2026


Attached is a sample form used by Snohomish County.  I am sure King County must have one as well.


Randy M. Boyer                                                 ______
Attorney, WSBA# 8665
Law Office of Randy M. Boyer, Inc. P.S. 
7017 196th St. S.W.  Lynnwood, Washington 98036
( 425.712.3107|   Fax 425.778.2274
mail to: randyedlynlaw at gmail.com <mailto:randyedlynlaw at gmail.com>
This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, and is legally privileged.  This email was sent by an attorney or his agent, is intended only for the addressee’s use, and may contain confidential and privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, reproduction or other use of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender by reply email.  Thank you for your cooperation.


> On Apr 6, 2026, at 2:45 PM, Lynn Clare <lynnclare at clarelawfirm.com> wrote:
> 
> Thank you, Teena
> 
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 2:39 PM Teena Williams <Teena at jaglaw.net <mailto:Teena at jaglaw.net>> wrote:
>> Depends on if the grantee of the easement is the County.  If they agree to terminate the covenant for lack of applicability/necessity, it should be simple to record if the planning department agrees that it is not needed any longer.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I would connect with whoever at King County signed the covenant or required it to be done.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> A covenant cannot be unilaterally terminated. If homeowner is both grantor and grantee, then they can sign as such.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Teena Williams
>> 
>> <image001.jpg>
>> 
>> 1800 Cooper Point RD SW NO. 8  |  Olympia, WA 98502 
>> 
>> Telephone 360.352.1970  |  Fax 877.606.3656 |  www.jaglaw.net <http://www.jaglaw.net/>  
>> 
>> Teena at jaglaw.net <mailto:Teena at jaglaw.net>
>> Please note the use or modification of any documents prepared by this office outside the purpose for which they were prepared will result in a waiver of professional responsibility due from Goldstein Law Office, PLLC and may result in harm or unintended consequences.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Nothing contained herein should be construed as legal advice. The purpose of this email is to transmit a message or document. Should you not be the intended recipient of this email message, please reply advising of the mistake and then delete this message from your computer. Should you have any questions, please call the Sender at 360-352-1970.  No trees were killed in sending this message (however, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced).
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Lynn Clare
>> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2026 1:55 PM
>> To: WSBA Real Property listserve <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>
>> Subject: [WSBARP] Covenant
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> All
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> PC planned an extensive remodel of her King County home. As part of the permit process, King County required a covenant to be recorded "for maintenance and inspection of flow control."
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> As I understand, because she was going to expand the footprint of the house, King County wanted her to add two trench infiltration systems to her yard that were to be attached to the existing gutter system (as near I can see from the sketch.) Being enthusiastic about her remodel, she recorded the covenant.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> And then the whole project fell through as it turned out the addition couldn't be built as designed without spending about as much as the house is already worth.  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Her question to me was, can she somehow undo the recording of that covenant since the permit is expired and she isn't going to do anything about it?  She really doesn't want to build the trench infiltration system if it isn't required for a remodel.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Lynn Clare
>> 
>> Clare Law Firm
>> 
>> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> WSBARP mailing list
>> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
>> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20260406/24fc140b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Notice of Permit Vacation.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 36352 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20260406/24fc140b/NoticeofPermitVacation.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20260406/24fc140b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list