[WSBARP] Recording Standards Commission

[Mark Anderson]

I want that sort of glory (insert smiley face).  Let me know how I can help.

Mark B. Anderson
ANDERSON LAW FIRM PLLC
821 Dock Street, Suite 209, PMB 4-12
Tacoma, Washington 98402
+1 253-327-1750
+1 253-327-1751 (fax)
marka at mbaesq.com<mailto:marka at mbaesq.com>
www.mbaesq.com<http://www.mbaesq.com/>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This transmission is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual named recipient. It may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or other confidentiality protection. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, be advised that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender via e-mail or by telephone at (253) 327-1750 that you have received the message in error, and then delete it. Thank you.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Chris B
Sent: 03/27/2025 7:14 AM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Recording Standards Commission

Gang, this may be a shock, but I haven’t received a single response to this post. There’s gotta be someone who cares about this issue who is willing to attend a few zoom meetings, and receive all the attendant glory for offering their time.

Christopher T Benis
Sent from my iPhone


On Mar 17, 2025, at 2:34 PM, Chris B <chrisb at firstavenuelaw.com<mailto:chrisb at firstavenuelaw.com>> wrote:

Some of you will recall that I have served for the past several years as the WSBA representative to the Recording Standards Commission (RSC).

The RSC was formed by the legislature to be the official body that adopts WACs governing recording of documents at county recorders/auditor’s offices.  The goal is to harmonize recording practices across the state’s many counties.

A new issue that has arisen which relates to multi-transaction or multi-title documents sent in for recording. The issue is a bit convoluted, but is as follows:

Let’s say you were recording a document clearing title of multiple liens or conveying multiple interests to multiple unrelated parties.  An example would be an old railroad easement which is being cleared from the title of dozens or hundreds of parcels.  Some counties treat this as a single recording and some treat it (and index it) as however many parcels are involved. This means that the recording fee for a single document could be thousands of dollars for the first page (we heard a story from Spokane county of a $4,000 recording fee for the first page of such a document.

While quite an arcane issue, it may impact some of you (and your clients) tremendously.  The RSC is looking for one or two attorneys who would be interested in joining the subcommittee which will make recommendations to the RSC on this issue, and ultimately part of the WACs.

This is not a huge commitment.  It might only involve attending 3 or 4 zoom meetings.

If interested, please reply to me with a short statement of why you would have helpful insights to contribute.

Call me for any follow-up questions.

Chris Benis
First Avenue Law Group, PLLC
321 First Avenue West, Seattle, WA  98119
206.447-1900 office – 206.447.9075 fax – www. firstavenuelaw.com

This message contains information that may be CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED.  Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message.  If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail chrisb at firstavenuelaw.com<mailto:chrisb at firstavenuelaw.com>, and delete this message. Thank you very much.

To comply with recent IRS rules, we must inform you that this message, if it contains advice relating to federal taxes, was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under federal tax law.  Under recent IRS rules, a taxpayer may rely on professional advice to avoid federal tax penalties only if that advice is reflected in a comprehensive tax opinion that conforms to stringent requirements under federal law.  Please contact me if you would like to discuss our preparation of an opinion that conforms to these new rules.

***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20250327/48dc3baa/attachment.html>