[WSBARP] Today's King Co Recording Tale of Woe - help!

Craig Blackmon craig at lawofficeofcraigblackmon.com
Thu May 18 14:30:09 PDT 2023


Oh Mark, if only an attorney! Judge, jury, Gate Keeper... the whole nine
yards!

Please, if anyone has addressed this fact pattern* before, I would
appreciate hearing how you resolved the issue.

*Grantee's name only on debt, sole liable; $20k consideration; gift of
remaining equity. How do I complete the Supplemental Statement???

Craig
Craig Blackmon, Attorney at Law
<https://www.mywsba.org/PersonifyEbusiness/LegalDirectory/LegalProfile.aspx?Usr_ID=000000029240>
92 Lenora St. #103, Seattle WA  98121
Office/Cell: (206) 369-5949
On the blog: Changes to Title and the QCD
<https://seattlepropertylawyer.com/blog/quitclaim-deed-explained>
<https://seattlepropertylawyer.com/>    <https://www.fsbolawyers.org/>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication is a private, confidential
electronic communication encompassed by 18 USC 2510. It is for the sole use
of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone other than the intended
recipient does not constitute a loss of its confidential or privileged
nature.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender and destroy all
copies.


On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 2:19 PM Mark Anderson <marka at mbaesq.com> wrote:

> I'm sure glad the Recorder is an attorney then.  (Insert smiley face)
>
>
>
>
> *Mark B. Anderson *ANDERSON LAW FIRM PLLC
> 821 Dock St  Ste 209  PMB 4-12
> Tacoma, Washington 98402
> +1 253-327-1750
> +1 253-327-1751 (fax)
> marka at mbaesq.com
> www.mbaesq.com
>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *This transmission is confidential and is
> intended solely for the use of the individual named recipient. It may be
> protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or other
> confidentiality protection. If you are not the intended recipient, or the
> person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, be advised that
> any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
> immediately notify the sender via e-mail or by telephone at (253) 327-1750
> that you have received the message in error, and then delete it. Thank you.
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> *On Behalf Of *Craig Blackmon
> *Sent:* 05/18/2023 1:56 PM
> *To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [WSBARP] Today's King Co Recording Tale of Woe - help!
>
>
>
> Sam, that's exactly right.
>
>
>
> Mark, that's exactly what was rejected by the Recorder!
>
>
>
> Still looking for that silver bullet...
>
>
>
> Craig
>
> Craig Blackmon, Attorney at Law
> <https://www.mywsba.org/PersonifyEbusiness/LegalDirectory/LegalProfile.aspx?Usr_ID=000000029240>
>
> 92 Lenora St. #103, Seattle WA  98121
>
> Office/Cell: (206) 369-5949
>
> On the blog: Changes to Title and the QCD
> <https://seattlepropertylawyer.com/blog/quitclaim-deed-explained>
>
> <https://seattlepropertylawyer.com/>    <https://www.fsbolawyers.org/>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication is a private, confidential
> electronic communication encompassed by 18 USC 2510. It is for the sole use
> of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone other than the intended
> recipient does not constitute a loss of its confidential or privileged
> nature.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender and destroy all
> copies.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:31 PM <samuel at meylerlegal.com> wrote:
>
> Craig,
>
>
>
> When you say that the grantee has been and will be solely liable on the
> existing debt, do you mean that the grantee was the only party to the
> promissory note and the only one of them that was a party to the deed of
> trust?  Even if the grantee was the only one of the two that paid for any
> of the debt, DOR’s position is that the co-owner (grantor) is still liable
> for the underlying debt if they were a party to the promissory note or deed
> of trust.
>
>
>
> Sam
>
>
>
>
>
> *Samuel M. Meyler*
>
> *Meyler Legal, PLLC *
>
> 1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
>
> Seattle, Washington 98109
>
> *Tel:*  206.876.7770
>
> *Fax:*  206.876.7771
>
> *Email:*  samuel at meylerlegal.com
>
>
>
> *NOTICE:*
>
>
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or
> Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning
> of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information
> is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If
> you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
> prohibited.  If you received this transmission in error, please notify the
> sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> *From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <
> wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> *On Behalf Of *Craig Blackmon
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 18, 2023 10:20 AM
> *To:* WSBA Real Property List Serve <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
> *Subject:* [WSBARP] Today's King Co Recording Tale of Woe - help!
>
>
>
> Listmates, any insight you can provide as to a good path forward would
> be greatly appreciated. Here is my conundrum.
>
>
>
> Client (grantee) has been and will be solely liable on existing debt.
> Grantee paying co-owner (grantor) additional $20k. A gift of remaining
> equity.
>
>
>
> The excise tax should be due on the $20k. It appears to me (and now
> apparently the Recorder's Office as well) that the Supplemental Statement
> does not offer this option. I have now been told in the rejection notice
> that tax is due on one half the debt as well.
>
>
>
> The rejection notice includes a "call for assistance" [sic] phone number;
> call, put on hold for five minutes, told to call back. Ahhh, just keep
> breathing...
>
>
>
> At this point it may be more cost effective to file a lawsuit. What do you
> think?
>
>
>
> Craig
>
> Craig Blackmon, Attorney at Law
> <https://www.mywsba.org/PersonifyEbusiness/LegalDirectory/LegalProfile.aspx?Usr_ID=000000029240>
>
> 92 Lenora St. #103, Seattle WA  98121
>
> Office/Cell: (206) 369-5949
>
> On the blog: Changes to Title and the QCD
> <https://seattlepropertylawyer.com/blog/quitclaim-deed-explained>
>
> <https://seattlepropertylawyer.com/>    <https://www.fsbolawyers.org/>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication is a private, confidential
> electronic communication encompassed by 18 USC 2510. It is for the sole use
> of the intended recipient and receipt by anyone other than the intended
> recipient does not constitute a loss of its confidential or privileged
> nature.  Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If
> you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender and destroy all
> copies.
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20230518/0cc41610/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list