[WSBARP] Another odd situation

[Craig Gourley]

Client has a property which benefits from an easement.  Other properties in the development also have separate easements over the burdened property.  Many yeas later the covenants were revised ( not the easement) to state that the burdened property could charge for the use of the easement.  No price or formula was included just a statement that they could charge.  As to be expected,  this has now become an issue.  Anyone ever heard of a covenant allowing a party being allowed to charge for a recorded easement to be used for its intended purpose?  Thanks, Craig


GOURLEY LAW GROUP
THE EXCHANGE CONNECTION
SNOHOMISH ESCROW
P.O. Box 1091
Snohomish, WA 98291
PH:  (360) 568-5065 (800) 291-8401
Fax: (360) 568-8092

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain legally privileged, confidential information belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action based on the contents of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error, please contact sender and delete all copies.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20230510/2a3f85cf/attachment.html>