[WSBARP] Can landlord refuse rent during eviction proceedings?

[Athena Dickerson]

Follow up question on this post.  I have always used the statutory summons language for UD for a 3-day based on trespass.   Reasoning being even though they aren’t a tenant, this particular type of UD is specified under the RLTA (59.12.030(6)and not doing so will likely get my case dismissed.   I’ve seen a few others use a more general civil summons (with the shorter time period for response of course).     I’ve never had this challenged in court or had anyone argue because I used this form I somehow granted “tenant status” to a squatter.   Anyone else do something different?

Athena Makratzakis Dickerson
DETHLEFS SPARWASSER<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fdetsparlaw.com&c=E,1,3MignbV7JN3fDW35Ex6-X8EUG7nEGjNuKTlfq-Aje1rdb6fDs8Yt68iJDkX__xogulPxvRxqczE1jab42wQRIayCHjlfyP0fLjpZdlZRIPinoeG9OpKmAQ,,&typo=1>
REICH DICKERSON PLLC<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fdetsparlaw.com&c=E,1,bLSaO3IzGA_4xpDLui54w20Gh4qqnIdqihOO9lsFaFpEr3IyQlnxxNFTiURyp45gMfqeZoZNVArN8uCnWCEWoTGD7jQGcUGBlkqV6h6b1rlgrg,,&typo=1>
100 Second Avenue South, Suite 190  I  Edmonds, WA 98020
P  425.776.1352  I  F 425.776.2467
athena at detsparlaw.com<mailto:athena at detsparlaw.com>

This message and the documents attached to it, if any, contains confidential information from DETHLEFS SPARWASSER REICH DICKERSON PLLC, is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential under applicable law, and/or may contain attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please delete all electronic copies of this message and its attachments, destroy any hard copies you may have created and notify our office immediately.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Kaitlyn Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 4:25 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Can landlord refuse rent during eviction proceedings?

Usually in a nuisance case, the tenancy is terminated vis a vis a 3 day notice to quit. This terminates the tenancy and therefore rent is not due. So, accepting rent could “re-start” the tenancy. At this point, the occupancy past the expiration of the 3 day notice is a damages claim calculated by pro rata rent.

Sent from my iPhone


On Mar 9, 2022, at 10:19 AM, Maxwell Glasson <max at glassonlegal.com<mailto:max at glassonlegal.com>> wrote:

Hi Jennifer,

If the eviction is based upon nuisance, the landlord is not obligated to accept a rental payment from the client in this scenario.  That said, take a careful look at your lease to see how the wording of the “last month’s rent” is to be applied.

You may also want to include in the complaint a claim for rent and costs “to be proven at trial” and a prayer for the same so if the eviction is successful but extends beyond the move-out date.  You can then convert the action to a civil matter and it if the client thinks that would be cost/energy effective.

Regards,

Maxwell B. Glasson
Glasson Legal, PLLC
2212 Queen Anne Ave. N, #659
Seattle, Washington, 98109
206-627-0528
max at glassonlegal.com<mailto:max at glassonlegal.com>
www.glassonlegal.com<http://www.glassonlegal.com/>
WA# 51948  NV# 13339  CA# 292356
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY BE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED. THE INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM OR THE ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Jennifer Tengono
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 10:05 AM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Can landlord refuse rent during eviction proceedings?

Good morning Listmates.

Can a landlord refuse rent for a month-to-month tenant during an eviction that is (1) not based upon the failure to pay rent when the landlord already has received a last month’s rent payment at signing and (2) not section 8 housing? Landlord has already served complaint and summons on tenant for nuisance and intends to proceed with OSC hearing. In the meantime, the landlord intends to apply the last month’s rent already received for this March’s rent. In the event the eviction proceeds past March, the landlord would accept a prorated rent upon completion of the action. Landlord is not intending to make any claims regarding past due rent or anything of that nature, merely wishes to terminate lease in accordance with .650.

Thank you for your input.

Respectfully,

Jennifer Tengono

***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines, imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone; return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper and electronic copies. Any settlement offer contained herein is made pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on the part of this firm’s client(s) or its agents.  IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER:  To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20220310/5c3bc964/attachment.html>