[WSBARP] defective deed in chain of title

[Kary Krismer]

There are case(s) where a deed is changed by someone else other than the 
grantor and then re-recorded where the court doesn't seem to pay 
attention to who actually made the change.  I don't know whether of not 
those were all instances where the party had limited power of attorney, 
as is common in escrow situations.  The new deed could then refer to the 
changed deed's old and new recording numbers.  I've always questioned 
that approach, but with an $800 piece of property I wouldn't lose much 
sleep.

Kary L. Krismer
206 723-2148

On 6/7/2022 5:09 PM, Douglas Owens wrote:
> Dear list mates, I have an interesting question.  Property is in Mason County.  A 1994 deed purported to transfer the property based on a legal description that was partial in that it referred to a division and lot in a named plat but did not specify the volume and page where the plat was recorded, nor was there a parcel number or street address for the property.  A 2008 deed purported to convey the same property by stating for the legal description that it “was as described’ in the 1994 deed, without any additional information, also without street address or parcel number.  My client has negotiated to buy the property which is valued at only $800 because it is a greenbelt but I do not have confidence that his grantor has anything to convey because of the defective legal descriptions in the chain of title.  Is this something that can be corrected other than by having the first grantor in the chain of title re execute the deed that was recorded in 1994?  Thank you for your help.  Yours truly, Doug Owens
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp