[WSBARP] The Point; Option Agreements; Homeowner Benefit Agreements

[Dwight Bickel]

There are several messages on the King County real property lawyers’ listserve about something that I have not seen, but I believe similar to agreements that have been used around the country. Title companies confirm these are being sold in Washington, binding the property owner to use a certain firm for brokerage upon the next sale. On the national real property lawyers’ listserve, this was posted regarding actions that may need to be filed, and legislation may need to be passed, to protect against such contracts:

From: DIRT - Real Estate Lawyers Listserv <DIRT at LISTSERV.UMKC.EDU<mailto:DIRT at LISTSERV.UMKC.EDU>> On Behalf Of Whitman, Dale
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 11:11 AM
To: DIRT at LISTSERV.UMKC.EDU<mailto:DIRT at LISTSERV.UMKC.EDU>
Subject: [DIRT] Homeowner benefit agreements (so-called)

You may remember a previous conversation some months ago on DIRT about so-called homeowner benefit agreements, under which a real estate brokerage firm makes a cash payment to a homeowner. In return, the owner signs a contract promising to use the firm for brokerage services when the house is next listed for sale, any time in the next 40 years. The contract is recorded and purports to run with the land, binding future owners. It also has the effect of acting like a lien, discouraging or making impossible the refinancing of the house or placing a second mortgage or HELOC on it.

The brokerage firm will cancel the contract, but only on the payment by the homeowner of a substantial fee, typically 3% of the property’s current value. (One suspects that this is the firm’s main source of revenue from these contracts.) All of this is spelled out in the contract, of course, but is not well explained to the homeowner who is entering into the contract and receiving a check.

The Florida Attorney General’s office has just filed a suit against one of the main purveyors of these sorts of contracts. The AG seeks damages, penalties, and an injunction, relying mainly on the Florida consumer fraud statute. The word is that more state attorney general’s offices are readying similar suits. These things are predatory and deserve, IMHO, to be stamped out.

Dale


To add or remove from this mailing list, please go to <http://listserv.umkc.edu/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=DIRT&A=1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__listserv.umkc.edu_scripts_wa.exe-3FSUBED1-3DDIRT-26A-3D1&d=DwMFAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=p9vJsp0aoiE7RjUE9pW-_Qg_OI-6qMHlnZdfSllgAtM&m=viQZsXiEhIxnIC43_G4aENKmMrLUIz8iQr3rLRvmAkM&s=HdQ0Gjotz9OEykUyMPJhKR3uB9DgXbB5rO9CTNAdRrc&e=>> or send an email message to the address listserv at listserv.umkc.edu<mailto:listserv at listserv.umkc.edu>, with the text SIGNOFF DIRT in the body of the message.

Dwight A. Bickel
Real Property Title Advisor
Washington Title Professional
Dwight at DwightBickel.com<mailto:Dwight at DwightBickel.com>
https:/dwightbickel.com
206-484-1976

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20221205/41a990dc/attachment.html>