[WSBARP] Need to clear off of title an old (2006) DOT securing Note paid off (in 2010)

[Mark Anderson]

I recently used RCW 61.24.110(3) to clear title to permit a refinance.  Note that it does take the same amount of time as the time it takes to get a default in a quiet title action.

Mark B. Anderson
ANDERSON LAW FIRM PLLC
821 Dock St  Ste 209  PMB 4-12
Tacoma, Washington 98402
+1 253-327-1750
+1 253-327-1751 (fax)
marka at mbaesq.com<mailto:marka at mbaesq.com>
www.mbaesq.com<http://www.mbaesq.com/>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This transmission is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual named recipient. It may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or other confidentiality protection. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, be advised that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender via e-mail or by telephone at (253) 327-1750 that you have received the message in error, and then delete it. Thank you.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Dwight Bickel
Sent: 04/20/2022 2:41 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Need to clear off of title an old (2006) DOT securing Note paid off (in 2010)

RCW 61.24.110 offers three methods that might avoid a legal action to obtain quiet title. The choice will depend upon the borrower’s evidence regarding the payoff. I have used (1) and (3) with success.

If the payoff was done pursuant to a sale or refinance, then there will be escrow records to prove (a) a payoff statement from the beneficiary and (b) payoff sent and received by the beneficiary. Those are requirements for (2) and (3). If you have that evidence, then pursue (3). I have had many successes with that procedure, leading to a recorded Declaration by the escrow, which later title companies accepted to remove the old Deed of Trust. I can help with forms.

(2) has not worked for me yet. Its requirement is to prove the beneficiary provided a payoff statement and received that amount. But the title companies, serving as the Trustee, have not shown the courage to sign a Reconveyance without a signature by the successor beneficiary. I have submitted very clear proof of payment by a prior escrow. In one case, even after the payoff escrow recorded the Declaration of Payment, the title company still refused to sign the Reconveyance. Disappointing, because I led that statutory change as Chair of the Washington Land Title Ass’n and was very surprised when it did not work as designed.

If the payoff was not done pursuant to a payoff statement, then (1) is still a possible method. This has been the only method prior to that statute change. It can be successfully used though, especially if  the title company that is the Trustee is acting as the insurer for the new mortgage, so it has the incentive to incur risk related to the reconveyance. The key is proof that the debt was paid in full, combined with facts that there is no apparent beneficiary, then persuasive advocacy to the right person at the title company. Lastly, the title company acting as Trustee may be more willing to assume risk where the property owner provides an indemnity and has credit to back it.

The statute empowers the Trustee to reconvey upon proof of payoff pursuant to a written request of the property owner. Title companies acting as Trustee are only familiar with reconveying upon written request by the beneficiary. In many circumstances as counsel for the title company, I approved and signed full reconveyances at the request of the beneficiary.

(1) The trustee of record shall reconvey all or any part of the property encumbered by the deed of trust to the person entitled thereto on written request of the beneficiary, or upon satisfaction of the obligation secured and written request for reconveyance made by the beneficiary or the person entitled thereto.

I sympathize with the tale of inability to get a response from a successor beneficiary, when they have no present records to prove it held the note and received full payoff. Your client may have proof that it was involved, but cannot prove who now holds the note. In one instance, I commenced a legal action against Ocwen seeking an Order requiring it to sign a Request for Reconveyance, simply to get past its computer-driven line of defense protecting a real person from any action. Once it hired a lawyer, I got the Request for Reconveyance. If your client can’t prove it received the payoff, you may as well file the QT action and let the beneficiary(s) allow default.

Good luck!

Dwight A. Bickel
Real Property Title Advisor
Washington Title Professional
Dwight at DwightBickel.com<mailto:Dwight at DwightBickel.com>
https:/dwightbickel.com
206-484-1976


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20220421/15f632e6/attachment.html>