[WSBARP] Dissolved corp assets

[John McCrady]

RCW 23B.14.050 states:
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, dissolution of a corporation does not:
(e) Prevent commencement of a proceeding by or against the corporation in its corporate name;

I have never researched "Except as otherwise provided in this chapter.."

John McCrady
Counsel
Puget Sound Title Company
5350 Orchard Street West
University Place WA 98467
253-476-5721
j.mccrady at pstitle.com<mailto:j.mccrady at pstitle.com>

Beginning July 26, 2021, recording fees for most documents recorded in Washington will increase by $100<https://www.piercecountywa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/105275/Recording-Fee-Schedule-Effective-Jul-25-2021->. Please be sure to collect recording fees accordingly. Due to the above increase, our Reconveyance fees will also be increased by $100.00

WARNING-FRAUDULENT FUNDING INSTRUCTIONS
Email hacking and fraud are on the rise to fraudulently misdirect funds.  Please call your escrow officer immediately using contact information found from an independent source, such as the sales contract or internet, to verify any funding instructions received.  We are not responsible for any wire sent by you to an incorrect bank account.

***Due to the Covid 19 outbreak and with concern for the health and safety of our employees and community; our University Place lobby will remain locked during normal business hours. If you need to make an appointment or have any questions or concerns, please contact us at our main office at 253-474-4747. We appreciate your patience during these uncertain times and look forward to consistently exceeding your expectations.***

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Craig Gourley
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 12:51 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Dissolved corp assets

Listmates,  A corp listed as beneficiary on DOT. Was dissolved in 2004. We think the debt was satisfied by a deed in lieu on a different property in 2003. We now want to quiet title. Do we need to serve the old corporate shareholders as presumed holders of the DOT by distribution?  I appreciate your thoughts.

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android<https://r.xdref.com/?id=15OJSUY7057188&from=wsbarp-bounces@lists.wsbarppt.com&to=j.mccrady@pstitle.com&url=https://aka.ms/ghei36>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210628/6daae0e0/attachment.html>