[WSBARP] Easement with no original conveyance of record

[Ryan P. Coon]

List-mates,

Bit of a complicated question that I can't seem to find an answer on...

/Seller /owns two adjacent parcels, Parcels A and B. Real estate 
contract recorded (but no deed that we can find) where /Seller/ agrees 
to sell Parcel A including an easement over parcel B to /Buyer/. Despite 
no recorded deed, the parties subsequently act as if conveyance took 
place (/Buyer/ deeds Parcel A w/ the easement to a Third party who in 
turn deeds the same Parcel A w/ easement to another party, so on and so 
forth).

Without a recorded deed what is the status of the title to Parcel B? Is 
/Buyers/ line of title good? Or would title go to /Seller/ and /Sellers 
heirs/? If Buyers line of title is good, does that include the easement?

We represent the subsequent owner of Parcel B (the parcel burdened by 
the possible easement) and we're trying to determine if the easement was 
ever actually granted or conveyed. Any insight would be much appreciated.

-- 

Very Truly Yours,

Ryan P. Coon

Law Office of Cole & Gilday, P.C.

//

10101 - 270th St. NW

Stanwood, WA 98292

(360) 629-2900 (Telephone)

(360) 629-0220 (Fax)

This message contains confidential and privileged information that is 
intended only for the named recipient(s).Unless you are the named 
recipient or authorized agent thereof, you are prohibited from reading, 
copying, distributing or otherwise disseminating such information.If you 
receive this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210127/fcae7ba4/attachment.html>