[WSBARP] Judgment Establishing Boundary by Recorded Survey.

[Joseph McIntosh]

I believe the debtor / creditor summary is relevant to money judgments only, and for the purpose of facilitating the execution docket.  I would not utilize debtor / creditor designations on a purely title order.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Davis
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 1:59 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Judgment Establishing Boundary by Recorded Survey.

Parties to a boundary dispute want to settle by entry of a court order saying the boundary between their respective properties is as set forth in a recorded survey.  One party insists that, in the Judgment Summary, both parties be listed as both judgment debtors and creditors.  Have any of you, in settling  litigated boundary issues, used that kind of language in the order?  I don't see why the order just can't refer to the two parcels and then say the recorded survey sets forth the correct boundary.

Jeff

W. Jeff Davis, Esq.
BELL & DAVIS PLLC
P.O. Box 510
Sequim WA 98382
Phone No.:(360) 683.1129
Fax No.: (360) 683.1258
email: info at bellanddavispllc.com<mailto:info at bellanddavispllc.com>
www.bellanddavispllc.com<http://www.bellanddavispllc.com/>

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please e-mail the sender at info at bellanddavispllc.com<mailto:info at bellanddavispllc.com>  or call 360.683.1129

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210206/0fe878c3/attachment.html>