[WSBARP] UD Gurus

[Maxwell Glasson]

Paul,

My understanding is the “execution” is the lock-out.

To your second question, I’ve never dealt with this, but I think a trustee/settlor would have a safer argument than a member of an LLC.  Give it a whirl and let us know how it goes.

Regards,


Maxwell B. Glasson

Glasson Legal, PLLC

<x-apple-data-detectors://0/1>2212 Queen Anne Ave. N, #659<x-apple-data-detectors://0/1>

Seattle, Washington, 98109<x-apple-data-detectors://0/1>

206-627-0528<tel:206-627-0528>

max at glassonlegal.com<mailto:max at glassonlegal.com>

www.glassonlegal.com<http://www.glassonlegal.com/>

WA# 51948  NV# 13339  CA# 292356

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS CONFIDENTIAL AND MAY BE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED. THE INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL TO WHOM OR THE ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE.

________________________________
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of Paul Neumiller <pneumiller at hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 12:02:35 PM
To: Listserve RealProp (realprop at googlegroups.com) <realprop at googlegroups.com>; WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] UD Gurus


Two Items have just come up that I need to argue in less than two hours.  First, several sections of RCW 59.18 speak of actions that must be done "before execution of the writ of restitution."  So what does this mean?  Is the writ executed when the sheriff posts the door with the writ or is the writ executed when the sheriff shows up for the lock-out?  Second, my LL Client owns the residence using a family trust.  The LL gave a 90 day notice that "Joe Blow, as trustee of the Joe Blow Trust" intends to occupy the residence as  his primary residence.  Opposing council argues that a trust can't physically occupy the house so the notice is void.  Any experience out there on this argument?  Sorry for the rush.





[Paul A_ Neumiller]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20211223/6bfdbf95/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14843 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20211223/6bfdbf95/image001.jpg>