[WSBARP] Adverse Possession case against FDIC

Thu Apr 1 11:42:15 PDT 2021

So the question of "if the government owns the property in its ministerial capacity" was because if it didn't then adverse possession is available, correct?  Mike

[cid:483d617b-4c1c-427f-aa65-246c5447dc62]
________________________________
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> on behalf of Rod Harmon <rodharmon at msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 11:15 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession case against FDIC

You can’t adversely possess against the government.  Greg’s point is a good one.

Rod Harmon

RODNEY T. HARMON

       Attorney at Law

         P.O. Box 1066

      Bothell, WA   98041

     Tel:   (425) 402-7800

     Fax:  (425) 458-9096

    www.rodharmon.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.rodharmon.com&d=DwMFAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=KEDnavIX0T95_e0xmmP7pHPEymbbSteROH3HpiSq79g&m=QbXPG_iSfDiJIeSuDinJ1od9ea6os3rgrlBSt39-8Kw&s=2zRA3VhErmLSdvkiJRMLmcqJOwmr94kaAmAlb4TxAiM&e=>

   rodharmon at msn.com<mailto:rodharmon at msn.com>

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com On Behalf Of Gregory L. Ursich
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 6:46 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession case against FDIC

Randy: I think the US District Court for the jurisdiction where the property is located is appropriate.  Are you sure you cannot sue the FDIC in state court in the county where the property is? The FDIC as a governmental agency, would be holding the property in its ministerial capacity?  Also, if they are an agency of the federal government, immunity to adverse possession may be an issue, unless the 10 years ran before the FDIC acquired title.

[cid:image001.jpg at 01D726E8.3D9F30B0]

Gregory L. Ursich

Shareholder

Skyline Tower, Suite 1500 | 10900 NE 4th Street | Bellevue, WA 98004

P: 425.450.4258 | F: 425.635.7720

vCard<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Fwww.insleebest.com-252Fuploads-252Fvcards-252Fgursich.vcf-26data-3D04-257C01-257C-257C079659b6f8424592f3dd08d8f4b0d21f-257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa-257C1-257C0-257C637528387613247392-257CUnknown-257CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0-253D-257C1000-26sdata-3D8W3A-252Fc1VgrxMUkDzY0EbbrxCcZvR6j0XCvSKMeOPkws-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMFAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=KEDnavIX0T95_e0xmmP7pHPEymbbSteROH3HpiSq79g&m=QbXPG_iSfDiJIeSuDinJ1od9ea6os3rgrlBSt39-8Kw&s=IuYFlnyQUtt--NW4OdcUa5b9oJlDPUNddXSrLB6fkB4&e=> | website<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttp-253A-252F-252Fwww.insleebest.com-252F-26data-3D04-257C01-257C-257C079659b6f8424592f3dd08d8f4b0d21f-257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa-257C1-257C0-257C637528387613257387-257CUnknown-257CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0-253D-257C1000-26sdata-3DpcFBPiBPL-252FuH6ZQAWY3UNfILvuMA1kIPIw3wZiwXUZo-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMFAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=KEDnavIX0T95_e0xmmP7pHPEymbbSteROH3HpiSq79g&m=QbXPG_iSfDiJIeSuDinJ1od9ea6os3rgrlBSt39-8Kw&s=Oi464JiZK4yFDgvzILHR6QETuwK4GG-3DM-kEqlBuOo&e=> | gursich at insleebest.com<mailto:gursich at insleebest.com>

This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed.  If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender.  Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Randy Boyer
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 5:39 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Adverse Possession case against FDIC

Listmates

A lawsuit for adverse possession needs to be filed against FDIC that owns property.

I assume that needs to be filed in Federal Court. Would that be the district where the property is located or are there other jurisdictional or venue provisions that apply for a suit involving FDIC?

I’d appreciate any insight you have.

Randy

Randy M. Boyer                                                 ______
Attorney, WSBA# 8665

Law Office of Randy M. Boyer, Inc. P.S.
7017 196th St. S.W.  Lynnwood, Washington 98036
• 425.712.3107|   Fax 425.778.2274
mail to: randyedlynlaw at gmail.com<mailto:randyedlynlaw at gmail.com>

This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521, and is legally privileged.  This email was sent by an attorney or his agent, is intended only for the addressee’s use, and may contain confidential and privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, reproduction or other use of the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender by reply email.  Thank you for your cooperation.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210401/215bca23/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5282 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210401/215bca23/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook-kmju0ax5.png
Type: image/png
Size: 57245 bytes
Desc: Outlook-kmju0ax5.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20210401/215bca23/Outlook-kmju0ax5.png>