[WSBARP] Damage to Property/Claims?

[Kerry Richards]

Dear Sam:
Given that it is part of the City’s right of way, there may be a crime involved. Malicious mischief at least. Police should be called to investigate and resolve the matter.
Yours truly,

Kerry A. Richards, Attorney
[cid:image001.png at 01D31B65.31A26710]
The Law Offices of Michael W. Bugni & Associates, PLLC
11300 Roosevelt Way NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98125
EMAIL: krichards at lawgate.net
TEL: 206-365-5500
WEB: www.lawgate.net<http://www.lawgate.net/>



From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Samuel M. Meyler
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 10:25 AM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv'
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Damage to Property/Claims?

A picnic does sound great!

The issue with the property damage claim is that it’s not the contractor’s property.  It’s the sidewalk/right-of-way.  Does the contractor have standing and/or a claim?


Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, Washington 98109
Tel:  206.876.7770
Fax:  206.876.7771
Email:  samuel at meylerlegal.com<mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com>

NOTICE:

This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited.  If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments.  Thank you.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Jennifer L White
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 10:12 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Damage to Property/Claims?

Sam,
As to the “other thoughts” request:
Time for an overnight campout in the yard to stand vigil over the pristine concrete 😊 Sounds like the neighbor is a passive aggressive sort, so if someone is there they will likely leave it alone. Have a nice marshmallow roast with a group of friends, preferably large burley ones (friends, not marshmallows).

You can sue them as a tort for the cost of the property damage, but you’re going to need proof it was actually them in order to get anywhere. Set up a video camera to catch them in the act (Ring cameras are cheap and easy to use). That would only provide proof for the new incident, but with the civil standard at preponderance, you may be able to pin them for the other three times.

One time when I was serving as PR for an estate that had real property with a failed septic, we had to have it re-done in order to sell. The county required us to put in an elaborate and expensive system with two huge tanks. The contractor wanted an exorbitant price for someone to stand by and watch the new tanks fill up with water for a test – using a garden hose. I volunteered (no cost to the estate) and my husband and dog came along for a hot date on a Friday night. We packed a picnic dinner and hung out for hours. The dog had the best time running through the dirt piles from all of the open ditches in the new drain field. Good times!

Jennifer L. White, Esq.
[cid:image002.jpg at 01D6AEBD.FB3C8DF0]

jen at appletreelaw.com<mailto:jen at appletreelaw.com>
PO Box 11037
Yakima, WA 98909
509.225.9813

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Samuel M. Meyler
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 4:48 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Damage to Property/Claims?

Listmates,

I’m looking for some input on a new one for me.  Contractor (Client) is hired to repair a sewer line.  Client is required to excavate the sidewalk/right-of-way to complete the work and then restore it pursuant to the permit and plans.  The section of sidewalk that needs to be restored directly abuts the driveway of a neighbor’s property.

Neighbor of Owner that hired Client is unhappy about the Client making construction noise and working so close to their driveway and has (get this!) gone out and caused damage to the wet concrete in the right-of-way three times.  The contractor does the restorative work…concrete is drying…neighbor goes out and messes with the wet concrete so it no longer meets specifications.

The Contractor is obligated to restore the sidewalk/right-of-way in accordance with the City’s rules and specifications and the neighbor is interfering.  What causes of action can the Contractor assert?  Any other thoughts?  Thanks.

Sam


Samuel M. Meyler
Meyler Legal, PLLC
1700 Westlake Ave. N., Ste. 200
Seattle, Washington 98109
Tel:  206.876.7770
Fax:  206.876.7771
Email:  samuel at meylerlegal.com<mailto:samuel at meylerlegal.com>

NOTICE:

This electronic message contains information which may be Confidential or Privileged and constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 USC 2510. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited.  If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender and delete the copy you received together with any attachments.  Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20201030/cc27f061/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 45232 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20201030/cc27f061/image001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3111 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20201030/cc27f061/image002.jpg>