[WSBARP] Adverse possession

[nestor at pplsweb.com]

I agree.

 

 

Nestor Gorfinkel, Attorney at Law

Licensed in Washington & Florida

Florida Civil-Law (International) Notary

 

ATTENTION - This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at the phone numbers provided herein and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender.

 

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

 

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of J. B. Ransom
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 1:11 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBARP] Adverse possession

 

This seems quite simple.  The properties were owned by one party - common owner (CO).  CO then deeded one of the two adjoining parcels to A.  Then CO deeded the other parcel to B.  The legal descriptions in the SW Deeds should tell you what the CO conveyed.  Should make no difference how CO acquired title.  The party now claiming adverse possession is wrong.



-- 

J. B. Ransom
Winslow Law Group, PLLC

Seattle office:  206.282.4900
Bainbridge office:  206.842.3100

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200210/21f34d68/attachment.html>