[WSBARP] Flexible Tree/Bush Height Language for CC & R's

[Douglas Scott]

One drafted in a Declaration in which I am dealing states that:
No structure or part thereof on the real property which is described on the
attached Exhibit A as the Smith Property and the Jones Property may be
erected or constructed, and no trees, shrubs or other vegetation may be
permitted to grow, to an elevation greater than 25 feet above the existing
grade.

It could also state that they cannot grow to a height which impairs the
view of the Olympic Mtns from the Doe and Moe properties.

*DOUGLAS W. SCOTT*
Rainier Legal Advocates|LLC

465 Rainier Blvd. N., Suite C
Issaquah, Washington 98027
425.392.8550 (tel)
425.392.2829 (fax)



www.rainieradvocates.com


Notice: This communication, including attachments, may contain information
that is confidential and protected by the attorney/client or other
privileges. It constitutes non-public information intended to be conveyed
only to the designated recipient(s). If the reader or recipient of this
communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or agent of the
intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, or you believe that you have received this communication in
error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and promptly
delete this e-mail, including attachments without reading or saving them in
any manner. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution, or
reproduction of this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may
be unlawful. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not
a waiver of any attorney/client or other privilege


On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:47 AM Jeff Davis <jeff at bellanddavispllc.com>
wrote:

> Listmates:
>
>
>
> Client is revising CC & R’s and wants to incorporate a more flexible
> height restrictions for trees and bushes.  The HOA has seven different
> Plats where some lots enjoy  views of the strait with other looking at the
> Olympic Mountains.  In places where trees/bushes do no impair any views the
> restrictions  do not make sense, but have lead to nasty neighbor
> interaction for owners just wanting to make trouble.  Do any of you have
> language that addresses this type of issue that you would be willing to
> share?
>
>
>
> Jeff Davis
>
>
>
> W. Jeff Davis, Esq.
>
> BELL & DAVIS PLLC
> P.O. Box 510
> Sequim WA 98382
> Phone No.:(360) 683.1129
> Fax No.: (360) 683.1258
> email: info at bellanddavispllc.com
> www.bellanddavispllc.com
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged,
> confidential, and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly
> prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in
> error, please e-mail the sender at info at bellanddavispllc.com  or call
> 360.683.1129
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not
> restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing
> attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and
> others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20200826/d537f659/attachment.html>