[WSBARP] Question regarding NWMLS Form

[Ronald L. Coleman]

Thank you and I have learned from others now that this is a rule that NWMLS requires the reporting, and to do otherwise violates the rule.  Seems to me easier to just allow the reporting.

Ron

Ronald L. Coleman
Direct 253-238-5129 - rcoleman at dpearson.com
Davies Pearson, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
920 Fawcett Avenue / PO Box 1657, Tacoma, WA 98401
253-620-1500 | Fax 253-238-5158 | www.dpearson.com<http://www.dpearson.com>
Download vCard<http://www.dpearson.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Ronald_1584702.vcf> | View Profile<http://www.dpearson.com/people/ronald-l-coleman>

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Fry
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2019 10:41 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Question regarding NWMLS Form

Does your client (buyer) understand that the sale will still be of public record and will be reported on sites, such as Zillow.com?<http://Zillow.com?>  I would try to better ascertain what is driving your client’s concern with this language because if he/she thinks this will be advantageous to avoid the tax assessor not being aware of a higher value, that will not be the case.


Marcus J. Fry
Lyon, Weigand & Gustafson, P.S.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Ronald L. Coleman
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2019 9:51 AM
To: 'wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com'
Subject: [WSBARP] Question regarding NWMLS Form


Client using NWMLS form to  for purchase as proposed by seller, and has made several revisions. Client buyer wants to not have the transaction reported on multiple listing. He crossed out the provision and Realtor is insisting:  - “Sale Information - It is required by NWMLS that we report this Purchase and Sale and is not an option to delete this clause.”

I have not had this position taken before where a party did not want sale reported on NWMLS. Why can’t parties cross out this section for Form 28 Clause I? Realtor says ok to other revisions to the form, but not this provision.

Ron  Coleman
Ronald L. Coleman
Direct 253-238-5129 - rcoleman at dpearson.com<mailto:rcoleman at dpearson.com>
Davies Pearson, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
920 Fawcett Avenue / PO Box 1657, Tacoma, WA 98401
253-620-1500 | Fax 253-238-5158 | www.dpearson.com<http://www.dpearson.com>
Download vCard<http://www.dpearson.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Ronald_1584702.vcf> | View Profile<http://www.dpearson.com/people/ronald-l-coleman>

This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (800) 439-1112, and destroy all copies of the original message.

IRS regulations require us to advise you that, unless otherwise specifically noted, any federal tax advice in this communication (including any attachments, enclosures, or other accompanying materials) was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties; furthermore, this communication was not intended or written to support the promotion or marketing of any of the transactions or matters it addresses. Please call us for additional information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190306/051c9c84/attachment.html>