[WSBARP] [REALPROP] Condo dues lien versus Statute of Limitations

Bryce Dille Bryce at dillelaw.com
Sun Jun 30 17:37:17 PDT 2019


My clients have had no problems lender is still in first position except for a few months  delinquent assessments just like former statute except association can now recover a limited amount of collection costs

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 30, 2019, at 7:44 AM, Cyrus Field <cyfield at rockisland.com<mailto:cyfield at rockisland.com>> wrote:

As an aside, does anyone have experience with financing of condos under the new Common Interest Ownership statute? In particular does the new 6 yr SL of limitations for assessments scare them? TIA, Cy

Cyrus W. Field, Attorney at Law (admitted in Washington and Oregon)
phone: 360-472-1223 Mail: POB 367, Shaw Island, WA 98286 Office: 640 Mullis St. Friday Harbor, WA
******************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail message, including attachments, may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail the sender at cyfield at rockisland.com<mailto:cyfield at rockisland.com> and destroy or delete the original and any copies.



From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Setareh Mahmoodi
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 3:27 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv
Cc: REALPROP at yahoogroups.com<mailto:REALPROP at yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] [REALPROP] Condo dues lien versus Statute of Limitations

I agree and read it to mean the same.

Setareh

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:54 AM Carmen Rowe <carmen at gryphonlawgroup.com<mailto:carmen at gryphonlawgroup.com>> wrote:
Eric -

My two cents, is a reading of the statutes as a whole (per statutory interpretation rules) the "all" dues necessarily incorporates only all validly existing dues.

I think that consistent both with intent (which was clearly to limit exposure to past dues if association just sat on their rights), and rational thinking - you can't have liability for an invalid debt.


Carmen Rowe, Attorney/Owner
<image001.jpg>
Phone: (360) 669-3576 (direct cell)
Email:  Carmen at GryphonLawGroup.com<mailto:Carmen at GryphonLawGroup.com>

Mailing address: 1673 S. Market Blvd. #202, Chehalis, WA 98532
Olympia/Lacey office: 1415 College Street SE, Lacey, WA 98503
Seattle office: 1001 4th Avenue, Suite 3200, Seattle, WA 98154

We also offer virtual meeting options, and are often available to meet with you in an alternate location convenient to you.

Privileged and confidential: This message is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please let us know, and please delete and disregard any information it contains. We thank you for your respect in not sharing this email with anyone.
If we are communicating with you regarding a debt or monies owed, THIS MAY BE AN ATTEMPT TO COLLECT A DEBT, AND ANY INFORMATION WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE. You have the right to seek legal advice from an attorney. To the extent that the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act applies, this firm is acting as a debt collector for the firm's client named above. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes.


On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:58 AM Eric Nelsen eric at sayrelawoffices.com<mailto:eric at sayrelawoffices.com> [REALPROP] <REALPROP at yahoogroups.com<mailto:REALPROP at yahoogroups.com>> wrote:

Looking for confirmation here that I'm right, or else a stern rebuke for wishful thinking.

Property has about 8 years of back condo dues unpaid.

Condo is organized under the Horizontal Property Regimes Act--the old one. Per RCW 64.34.010(1)<https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=64.34&full=true#64.34.010>, the lien provisions of the 1990 Act, RCW 64.34.364<https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=64.34&full=true#64.34.364>, apply to this condo.

RCW 64.34.364 has a 3-year statute of limitations on back dues:

(8) A lien for unpaid assessments and the personal liability for payment of assessments is extinguished unless proceedings to enforce the lien or collect the debt are instituted within three years after the amount of the assessments sought to be recovered becomes due.

But it also has this, which says "all" unpaid dues:

(12) ....In a voluntary conveyance, the grantee of a unit shall be jointly and severally liable with the grantor for all unpaid assessments against the grantor up to the time of the grantor's conveyance....

In this context, "all" just means the most recent three years of dues, because collection of the older dues is barred by statute of limitations, right? Section 12 can't possibly mean that in a voluntary conveyance the statute of limitations under (8) does not apply?

[Note--it looks like the statute of limitations is changed to six years under the new UCIOA, RCW 64.90.485(9)<https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=64.90&full=true#64.90.485>. But the "all" language is carried over into the new act as well, RCW 64.90.485(17).]

Sincerely,

Eric

Eric C. Nelsen
SAYRE LAW OFFICES, PLLC
1417 31st Ave South
Seattle WA  98144-3909
phone 206-625-0092
fax 206-625-9040

__._,_.___
________________________________
Posted by: Eric Nelsen <Eric at sayrelawoffices.com<mailto:Eric at sayrelawoffices.com>>
________________________________
Reply via web post<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/REALPROP/conversations/messages/38481;_ylc=X3oDMTJxZWpyNDBkBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEzNjE3MTgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA3NzA5BG1zZ0lkAzM4NDgxBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTU2MTU3MTc3Nw--?act=reply&messageNum=38481>
•
Reply to sender <mailto:Eric at sayrelawoffices.com?subject=Re%3A%20Condo%20dues%20lien%20versus%20Statute%20of%20Limitations>
•
Reply to group <mailto:REALPROP at yahoogroups.com?subject=Re%3A%20Condo%20dues%20lien%20versus%20Statute%20of%20Limitations>
•
Start a New Topic<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/REALPROP/conversations/newtopic;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZDFzc2s1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEzNjE3MTgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA3NzA5BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA250cGMEc3RpbWUDMTU2MTU3MTc3Nw-->
•
Messages in this topic<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/REALPROP/conversations/topics/38481;_ylc=X3oDMTM2ZzFwaGRwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEzNjE3MTgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA3NzA5BG1zZ0lkAzM4NDgxBHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTU2MTU3MTc3NwR0cGNJZAMzODQ4MQ--> (1)
Visit Your Group<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/REALPROP/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJlZm1mdnQ3BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzEzNjE3MTgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA3NzA5BHNlYwN2dGwEc2xrA3ZnaHAEc3RpbWUDMTU2MTU3MTc3Nw-->
<image002.jpg><https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJkam9ha3NlBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzEzNjE3MTgEZ3Jwc3BJZAMxNzA1MDA3NzA5BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA2dmcARzdGltZQMxNTYxNTcxNzc3>
• Privacy<https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • Unsubscribe<mailto:REALPROP-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe> • Terms of Use<https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

SPONSORED LINKS
<image003.jpg>
<image003.jpg>
<image003.jpg>
.
<image003.jpg>
<image003.jpg>
__,_._,___
***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp


--

Best regards,



Setareh Mahmoodi

Attorney at Law

18222 104th Ave NE, Suite 103

Bothell, WA 98011

Phone: 425-806-1500

Fax: 425-489-4142 (Please email documents if at all possible)

Email: SM at LawOfficesofSM.com<mailto:SM at LawOfficesofSM.com>

Website: http://www.lawofficesofsm.com/



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments is a transmission from the law firm and is intended for the recipient only.  It may contain information that is confidential and legally protected by the attorney-client, work product and/or other privileges.  If you are not the designated or intended recipient, please destroy the message without disclosing any of its contents and notify us immediately by reply email or by calling (425) 806-1500.

Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190701/d9e0d655/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 519 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190701/d9e0d655/image001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 359 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190701/d9e0d655/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 332 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190701/d9e0d655/image003.jpg>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list