[WSBARP] Easement over US ground

Paul Neumiller pneumiller at hotmail.com
Thu Jun 27 15:51:16 PDT 2019


Your first analysis is whether the easement is in gross or appurtenant.  Hopefully, OO’s deed to the USA identified that OO owned real property in the area at the time that was intended by the parties to be benefited by the reservation of easement.  Generally, if an easement is appurtenant, then it automatically runs with the land and doesn’t require subsequent mentions in the deeds to transfer automatically.


[cid:image002.jpg at 01D52CFF.97214400]

IMPORTANT NOTICE:  This e-mail message is intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive the confidential information it may contain. E-mail messages to clients of Paul A. Neumiller presumptively contain information that is confidential and legally privileged; e-mail messages to non-clients are normally confidential and may also be legally privileged. Please do not read, copy, forward or store this message unless you are the intended recipient of it. If you have received this message in error, please forward it back to the sender and delete it completely from your computer system.

E-mail communication on the Internet may NOT be secure. There is a risk that this confidential communication may be intercepted illegally. There may also be a risk of waiving attorney-client and/or work-product privileges that may attach to this communication. DO NOT forward this message to a third party. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the sender.


From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Josh Grant
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 2:51 PM
To: wsbar <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Easement over US ground

Original owner (hereinafter OO)and client’s  predecessor in interest gave a deed to the USA in 1950.  At the end of the deed it said “There is reserved to the Grantor a perpetual easement to reconstruct, operate and maintain the presently existing roads located upon the above-described property.”
OO then sold land that is near federal land that is  serviced by the old existing road to grantee #1.  He did not convey an easement over the federal land on the old existing road in question.
Grantee #1 then sold land to client. He also did not convey an easement over the federal land on the old existing road
Client was stopped from maintaining road by federal agents.

I want to tell USA that my client can still use and maintain this road.

Any ideas given the fact that the easement was never put on subsequent deeds?

Josh





Joshua F. Grant
[advocates]
P. O. Box 619
Wilbur, WA 99185
509 647 5578
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190627/30b96dad/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 12625 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190627/30b96dad/image002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7674 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190627/30b96dad/image003.png>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list