[WSBARP] House encroachment

Rob Wilson-Hoss rob at hctc.com
Thu Dec 12 17:13:22 PST 2019


I guess they do it differently up there. The lesson is that one should, as I
said, check with the planner to make things go as smoothly as you can for
the client. 

 

Rob

 

Robert D. Wilson-Hoss

Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP

236 West Birch Street

Shelton, WA 98584

360 426-2999

www.hossandwilson-hoss.com

rob at hctc.com

 

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified
that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us by
reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed above)
and immediately delete this message and any and all of its attachments.
Thank you.

 

THIS OFFICE DOES DEBT COLLECTION AND THIS E-MAIL MAY BE AN ATTEMPT TO
COLLECT A DEBT, ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE.  To
the extent the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692)
applies this firm is acting as a debt collector for the
condominium/homeowners' association named above to collect a debt owed to
it. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes. You have
the right to seek advice of legal counsel.

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
On Behalf Of Gregory L. Ursich
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 4:03 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] House encroachment

 

In Seattle or King county, if you ask for a “blessing” they will require you
(wrongly)  to do a boundary line adjustment at great cost and delay; which
is not the law.

 




Gregory L. Ursich 

Shareholder

Skyline Tower, Suite 1500 | 10900 NE 4th Street | Bellevue, WA 98004

P: 425.450.4258 | F: 425.635.7720

 <http://www.insleebest.com/uploads/vcards/gursich.vcf> vCard |
<http://www.insleebest.com/> website |  <mailto:gursich at insleebest.com>
gursich at insleebest.com

 

This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is
intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed.  If you
have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to
the sender.  Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the
attorney-client or any other privilege.

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
[mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Rob Wilson-Hoss
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 3:41 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] House encroachment

 

Yes and no. Here, the Assessor and Auditor will ask the planner if it meets
the requirements of the statute. If you want to fight that system, ok, but
it is easier to run it by them first. 

 

Robert D. Wilson-Hoss

Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP

236 West Birch Street

Shelton, WA 98584

360 426-2999

www.hossandwilson-hoss.com <http://www.hossandwilson-hoss.com> 

rob at hctc.com <mailto:rob at hctc.com> 

 

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified
that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us by
reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed above)
and immediately delete this message and any and all of its attachments.
Thank you.

 

THIS OFFICE DOES DEBT COLLECTION AND THIS E-MAIL MAY BE AN ATTEMPT TO
COLLECT A DEBT, ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE.  To
the extent the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692)
applies this firm is acting as a debt collector for the
condominium/homeowners' association named above to collect a debt owed to
it. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes. You have
the right to seek advice of legal counsel.

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> > On Behalf Of Gregory L. Ursich
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 2:17 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] House encroachment

 

Rob: I respectfully disagree on one of your points; no municipal approval or
review is needed for a proper boundary line agreement under RCW 58.04.007.
It is state law.  My law firm has a very large municipal  practice and we
represent about 10 cities and many special purpose districts and all of my
municipal partners agree with me that no municipal approval or review is
needed.  But, I do agree you need to get a partial release from the lender
for the neighbor property.  Especially if you are selling the property right
away. Sometimes, if a lender is difficult to get in touch with, then a
“friendly quiet title action” may be better, where the lender is named and
has to get counsel (likely title insurance appointed).  -Greg

 




Gregory L. Ursich 

Shareholder

Skyline Tower, Suite 1500 | 10900 NE 4th Street | Bellevue, WA 98004

P: 425.450.4258 | F: 425.635.7720

 <http://www.insleebest.com/uploads/vcards/gursich.vcf> vCard |
<http://www.insleebest.com/> website |  <mailto:gursich at insleebest.com>
gursich at insleebest.com

 

This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is
intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed.  If you
have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to
the sender.  Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the
attorney-client or any other privilege.

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
[mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Rob Wilson-Hoss
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 1:42 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] House encroachment

 

I agree that statutory boundary line agreements can be very useful, and I
very much prefer them over the code approval Boundary Line Adjustment
process, usually. You have to have a survey, and you should know what your
planner will think about these before you start, and if there are any local
governmental hoops to jump through; but agreements can be cheaper, far, far
quicker, and more malleable. For example, you can throw in all sorts of
stuff like reservations, restrictions, and so on.  But whenever you come
anywhere near either a statutory boundary line agreement or a code Boundary
Line Agreement, or a quiet title lawsuit or any other way to move
boundaries, one of the first things to do is to get title reports, either
just tract book reports or actual guarantees, on both lots. You will likely
find financing, and perhaps other encumbrances, on the neighbor’s lot. 

 

Know that almost always, Big Bank (or Little Credit Union, or grandmother)
lent money with security being the original legal description of the
neighbor’s parcel, before your agreement/adjustment  That loan trust deed is
prior in time, no doubt, to whatever you do and however you do it. So, if
the neighbor agrees, but later defaults on the loan and Big Bank forecloses,
the foreclosure will be as to the original description; all you have done is
kick the can down the road, and you will have to deal with it at that later
time. Sure, you will still have your adverse possession facts, but you will
be dealing with a new owner with legal title relating back to the deed of
trust legal description, and therefore starting at zero in terms of finding
a resolution path.

 

Those with experience in these matters will know that it should be possible
to get Big Bank to do a partial release, for the part of that parcel that
will be changing ownership, so long as they are sufficiently collateralized.
But the larger the bank the less chance you will ever get this done. 

 

You have to judge your circumstances. Sometimes the only way you can give
your clients absolute security is to file a quiet title action; if the
neighbor agrees, then it can be a friendly action. You then name and serve
all encumbrancers who have interests on the neighbor’s lot. Big Bank will
default almost always, so you get a judgment quieting title against not only
the neighbor, but also all defendant encumbrancers, including Big Bank, as
to the transferred part of the neighbor’s lot. Again in theory, though, the
neighbor may have to answer to his lender based on the terms of the deed of
trust, which don’t usually allow losing part of the securing property to an
adverse possession claim. But again, Big Bank will very much not likely
either notice or want to deal with any of that, again, so long as there are
no real issues with the value of the remainder of the lot versus the amount
of the loan. As long as the loan is adequately collateralized then Big Bank
should not care. 

 

On the other hand, I am not really very good at predicting what Big Bank
will care about, or what it will do. Once I actually did get a partial
release from a very big bank.  

 

Rob

 

Robert D. Wilson-Hoss

Hoss & Wilson-Hoss, LLP

236 West Birch Street

Shelton, WA 98584

360 426-2999

www.hossandwilson-hoss.com <http://www.hossandwilson-hoss.com> 

rob at hctc.com <mailto:rob at hctc.com> 

 

This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law.  If you are not the addressee, you are hereby notified
that any use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited.  If you received this message in error, please notify us by
reply e-mail or by telephone (call us collect at the number listed above)
and immediately delete this message and any and all of its attachments.
Thank you.

 

THIS OFFICE DOES DEBT COLLECTION AND THIS E-MAIL MAY BE AN ATTEMPT TO
COLLECT A DEBT, ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE.  To
the extent the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692)
applies this firm is acting as a debt collector for the
condominium/homeowners' association named above to collect a debt owed to
it. Any information obtained will be used for collection purposes. You have
the right to seek advice of legal counsel.

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> > On Behalf Of Gregory L. Ursich
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 1:09 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] House encroachment

 

A boundary line agreement is the best way  to resolve this under RCW
58.04.007, which also requires a new survey and legal descriptions showing
the new, agreed boundary line.   Hopefully, you can get neighbor to
cooperate.  Do not do an easement as this is a permanent occupation and 15
years means the adverse possession requirements will have been met.  Also,
to have an insurable sale and to obtain title insurance for the new buyer
will require (as required by the title underwriters) a new boundary line
placing the house entirely on the client’s property.  I do a lot of these
and would be happy to help.

 




Gregory L. Ursich 

Shareholder

Skyline Tower, Suite 1500 | 10900 NE 4th Street | Bellevue, WA 98004

P: 425.450.4258 | F: 425.635.7720

 <http://www.insleebest.com/uploads/vcards/gursich.vcf> vCard |
<http://www.insleebest.com/> website |  <mailto:gursich at insleebest.com>
gursich at insleebest.com

 

This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is
intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed.  If you
have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to
the sender.  Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the
attorney-client or any other privilege.

 

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
[mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of nestor at pplsweb.com
<mailto:nestor at pplsweb.com> 
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 12:42 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv' <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> >
Subject: [WSBARP] House encroachment

 

PC bought a property for cash last year and is now selling. They discovered
that the Prefab home encroaches 15 feet on the neighbor’s property. The
encroachment was noted on the title policy indicating that has been there
over 15 years.

 

PC wants to approach neighbor in a friendly manner to resolve the issue.
Obviously wants to avoid time and expense of a quiet title suit. PC wanted
to know if the owner balks, can he simply get an easement that will
terminate when the house is demolished?

 

A deed of course is best, but they are trying to avoid the expense and time
to enforce in court. Any suggestions or thoughts?

 

 

Nestor Gorfinkel, Attorney at Law

Licensed in Washington & Florida

Florida Civil-Law (International) Notary

 

ATTENTION - This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message
may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are
not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard
copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you
have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return
e-mail or by telephone at the phone numbers provided herein and delete this
message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded
message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of
this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender.

 

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191212/839bb87f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5282 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20191212/839bb87f/image001.jpg>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list