[WSBARP] Liability of seller who agrees to repair and repair fails

[Kary Krismer]

I don't have any authority, but I"m pretty sure it is not precluded.  
Before you go too far down that road I would first look to see if the 
language of the repair request was complied with.  35R requests are 
often very poorly drafted such that even a mere attempt to fix might be 
sufficient to comply with the request (or a half-ass repair sufficient).

Kary L. Krismer

John L. Scott, Inc.
206 723-2148

On 8/31/2019 12:09 AM, Andrew Hay wrote:
>
> Here is an awkward sentence but it is Friday night….  is a residential 
> buyer’s claim to force a seller to pay for a redo of an agreed repair 
> that was ineffective in solving the problem precluded by doctrine of 
> merger?
>
> *Andrew Hay*
>
> Hay & Swann PLLC
>
> 201 S. 34^th St.
>
> Tacoma, WA 98418
>
> /www.washingtonlaw.net <http://www.washingtonlaw.net/>/
>
> /andrewhay at washingtonlaw.net <mailto:andrewhay at washingtonlaw.net>/
>
> 253.272.2400 (w)
>
> 253.377.3085 (c)
>
> THIS IS A CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION AND IS INTENDED FOR THE 
> DESIGNATED RECIPIENT ONLY.  IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN 
> ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY AND DESTROY ALL COPIES
>
>
> ***Disclaimer: Please note that RPPT listserv participation is not restricted to practicing attorneys and may include non-practicing attorneys, law students, professionals working in related fields, and others.***
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20190831/e7b713da/attachment.html>