[WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment
HOWARD HERMAN
hhherman2 at comcast.net
Wed Jun 6 09:27:52 PDT 2018
Kary,
The court has the authority to enter a "Limited Screening Order" which
prevents screeners from reporting the eviction to future landlords. I keep
several copies of the Order in my brief case and find that many times the
landlord will not oppose the Order.
Howard Herman
Herman Herman and Jolley PS
509 220 5810
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
[mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Kary Krismer
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 8:54 AM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] unlawful detainer judgment
Isn't just the filing of an UD the kiss of death for finding a new rental?
I remember that one case where the tenant won because the landlord had no
grounds to evict, and even that made it difficult for them to rent
elsewhere.
Kary L. Krismer
John L. Scott/KMS
206 723-2148
On 6/6/2018 8:04 AM, Douglas W. Scott wrote:
Howard, I do have one request when you represent pro bono tenants: please
screen them so as not to represent a tenant who purposely goes from landlord
to landlord and fails to pay rent awaiting the landlord to eventually evict
them and then gets a pro bono lawyer to locate a technicality that sends the
landlord back to court multiple times, plus expenses to the Sheriff, and
costs the landlord (who may be a working class guy with one rental unit)
thousands of dollars. Then the tenant leaves the place a complete mess.
Douglas W. Scott
Law Offices of Douglas W. Scott
Windermere Building
1810 15th Place NW, Suite 203
Issaquah, Washington, 98027
V. 425.392.8550
F. 425-392-2829
www.davisscottlaw.com <http://www.davisscottlaw.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180606/f05efcd0/attachment.html>
More information about the WSBARP
mailing list