[WSBARP] WSBARP Digest, Vol 47, Issue 13
Stephen Whitehouse
swhite8893 at aol.com
Wed Aug 15 14:07:26 PDT 2018
If the spouse was awarded the property in the disso action, then a partition action is no longer possible as the parties are not tenants in common. That is probably a good thing as the court in the disso action has a lot more equitable discretion than a court would have in a partition action. Partition actions can also be very risky, assuming you cannot partition in kind. Under the statutes, it goes up for public sale(although some courts are allowing it to be a normal market sale). It then goes up for bid and if your client does not have the funds to bid, the client is very vulnerable. I do not do disso work, but used to years ago. I think you just get the thing before the court and ask the court to have it sold. Allowing the spouse who has the property to sell it also has pitfalls at that person can sabotage the sale. As a suggestion, you could ask the court to give that person so many months to sell(six at the most since if it isn't sold in that period with this market, something is wrong), and then requiring that spouse to vacate and put the property in the hands of a receiver of referee. If you do that, make sure that the court order empowers that person to sign all documents necessary to consummate the sale. Also, when you get an offer, it is not a bad idea to have a court approval contingency. While that forces you to move to have the court approve the sale, it also forces either of the parties to object at that time or be forever foreclosed. Probate attorney use this device all the time where there is an heir that thinks the property is worth a whole lot more than it is but has nothing to back it up.
Steve
Stephen Whitehouse
Whitehouse & Nichols, LLP
P.O. Box 1273
601 W. Railroad Ave.
Shelton, Wa. 98584
360-426-5885
swhite8893 at aol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: wsbarp-request <wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com>
To: wsbarp <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Sent: Wed, Aug 15, 2018 12:00 pm
Subject: WSBARP Digest, Vol 47, Issue 13
Send WSBARP mailing list submissions to
wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of WSBARP digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. cpa north re property development (Roger Hawkes)
2. Re: cpa north re property development (Craig Gourley)
3. Re: Partition Action or Not? (Andrew Hay)
4. Re: Partition Action or Not? (Steve Tubbs)
5. Re: Partition Action or Not? (Allen Sakai)
6. Re: Partition Action or Not? (Catherine Clark)
7. Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett (Alan Middleton)
8. Re: Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett (G. Geoffrey Gibbs)
9. Re: Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett (Alan Middleton)
10. Re: Partition Action or Not? (Gregory L. Gilday)
11. medical file retention in Will? (Gerald Sprute)
12. Re: Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett (Gregory L. Ursich)
13. Re: cpa north re property development (Roger Hawkes)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 19:12:22 +0000
From: Roger Hawkes <Roger at law-hawks.com>
To: Real Property Listserve <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>, Business Law
Section <business-law-section at list.wsba.org>
Subject: [WSBARP] cpa north re property development
Message-ID:
<693DA7DDC963424895D6BBD758595A21835CA463 at HLFSERVER1.law-hawks.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
A client is asking for a referral to a cpa familiar with real property development, preferably north king or south Snohomish county. Please refer someone(s).
PLEASE NOTICE OUR NEW ADDRESS BELOW, ACROSS THE STREET ALMOST FROM OUR PRIOR ADDRESS; OTHER CONTACT INFO REMAINS THE SAME
Roger Hawkes, WSBA 5173
19944 Ballinger Way NE
Suite 100
Shoreline, WA 98155
www.hawkeslawfirm.com<http://www.hawkeslawfirm.com/>
206 367 5000 voice
206 367 4005 fax
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180814/e459e35d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 19:38:34 +0000
From: Craig Gourley <craig at glgmail.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] cpa north re property development
Message-ID:
<DM5PR12MB24701319EC70A984F548FB1AAE380 at DM5PR12MB2470.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have worked with Bob Bauer at Bauer Evans in Everett many times on complex real estate matters and respect his abilities. 425 252 6909
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Roger Hawkes
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 12:12 PM
To: Real Property Listserve <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>; Business Law Section <business-law-section at list.wsba.org>
Subject: [WSBARP] cpa north re property development
A client is asking for a referral to a cpa familiar with real property development, preferably north king or south Snohomish county. Please refer someone(s).
PLEASE NOTICE OUR NEW ADDRESS BELOW, ACROSS THE STREET ALMOST FROM OUR PRIOR ADDRESS; OTHER CONTACT INFO REMAINS THE SAME
Roger Hawkes, WSBA 5173
19944 Ballinger Way NE
Suite 100
Shoreline, WA 98155
www.hawkeslawfirm.com<http://www.hawkeslawfirm.com/>
206 367 5000 voice
206 367 4005 fax
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180814/1b32b688/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 19:40:52 +0000
From: Andrew Hay <andrewhay at washingtonlaw.net>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Partition Action or Not?
Message-ID:
<CY4PR1301MB2103529C360AD789DF5487DCB2380 at CY4PR1301MB2103.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I would do that in the divorce action. Motion to force the sale. I would try to set up contempt as well to add some leverage
A
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Catherine Clark
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 10:45 AM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserve' <wsbarp at LISTS.WSBARPPT.COM>
Subject: [WSBARP] Partition Action or Not?
All:
In a divorce, where there is a final decree directing one spouse to refinance or sell the property to buy the other spouse out, what would you do if the one spouse has not refinanced or sold the property as directed by the decree?
File a motion to enforce in the dissolution action or file a separate action for partition to force a sale. Refinancing in this circumstance is highly optimistic.
Thank you.
Catherine "Cat" Clark
Law Office of Catherine C. Clark PLLC
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1250
Seattle, WA 98121
Phone: (206) 838-2528
Cell: (206) 409-8938
Fax: (206) 374-3003
Email: cat at loccc.com<mailto:cat at loccc.com>
NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic information transmission is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at (206) 838-2528. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180814/2d1a1ea3/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 12:54:42 -0700
From: Steve Tubbs <steven.tubbs at comcast.net>
To: "wsbarp at lists. wsbarppt. com" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Partition Action or Not?
Message-ID: <395A8AE6-F1CE-4ECE-BCE0-369685D6F7E1 at comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I?d offer a declaration in the disso action, setting out how, given the decree, refinancing by the obligee spouse is untenable, and that the obligor spouse has failed or refused to act. Based upon the same, the effective remedy is not a ?motion to compel?, but an order allowing the obligee to sell on reasonable terms, with the costs of the same to be deducted from the share of proceeds of sale payable to the defaulting party; and further that the defaulting party pay for the fees and costs otherwise incurred by the obligee spouse to enforce the decree provision pertaining to sale. Good luck!
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 10:44 AM, Catherine Clark <Cat at loccc.com> wrote:
>
> All:
>
> In a divorce, where there is a final decree directing one spouse to refinance or sell the property to buy the other spouse out, what would you do if the one spouse has not refinanced or sold the property as directed by the decree?
>
> File a motion to enforce in the dissolution action or file a separate action for partition to force a sale. Refinancing in this circumstance is highly optimistic.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Catherine "Cat" Clark
> Law Office of Catherine C. Clark PLLC
> 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1250
> Seattle, WA 98121
> Phone: (206) 838-2528
> Cell: (206) 409-8938
> Fax: (206) 374-3003
> Email: cat at loccc.com<mailto:cat at loccc.com>
>
> NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic information transmission is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at (206) 838-2528. Thank you.
>
> <winmail.dat>_______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180814/3491c113/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 20:32:56 +0000
From: Allen Sakai <asakai at jgslaw.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Partition Action or Not?
Message-ID:
<MWHPR11MB2045DC4C7EE20B0618F04DA0A1380 at MWHPR11MB2045.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I am working on one now as referee where the divorce counsel did move for partition. One thing that you may want to consider is some sort of writ of ejectment order as part of the motion. Otherwise you?ll end up selling the property and the other party won?t leave. Then you can?t deliver possession to the buyer.
Allen R. Sakai
Attorney at Law
Jeppesen Gray Sakai P.S.
10655 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 801
Bellevue, WA 98004-5044
Phone: 425-454-2344
Fax: 425-646-8889
asakai at jgslaw.com<mailto:asakai at jgslaw.com>
www.jgslaw.com<http://www.jgslaw.com/>
This communication is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication by someone other than the intended addressee or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify this firm immediately by collect call to (425)-454-2344, or by reply to this communication.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Steve Tubbs
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 12:55 PM
To: wsbarp at lists. wsbarppt. com
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Partition Action or Not?
I?d offer a declaration in the disso action, setting out how, given the decree, refinancing by the obligee spouse is untenable, and that the obligor spouse has failed or refused to act. Based upon the same, the effective remedy is not a ?motion to compel?, but an order allowing the obligee to sell on reasonable terms, with the costs of the same to be deducted from the share of proceeds of sale payable to the defaulting party; and further that the defaulting party pay for the fees and costs otherwise incurred by the obligee spouse to enforce the decree provision pertaining to sale. Good luck!
On Aug 14, 2018, at 10:44 AM, Catherine Clark <Cat at loccc.com<mailto:Cat at loccc.com>> wrote:
All:
In a divorce, where there is a final decree directing one spouse to refinance or sell the property to buy the other spouse out, what would you do if the one spouse has not refinanced or sold the property as directed by the decree?
File a motion to enforce in the dissolution action or file a separate action for partition to force a sale. Refinancing in this circumstance is highly optimistic.
Thank you.
Catherine "Cat" Clark
Law Office of Catherine C. Clark PLLC
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1250
Seattle, WA 98121
Phone: (206) 838-2528
Cell: (206) 409-8938
Fax: (206) 374-3003
Email: cat at loccc.com<mailto:cat at loccc.com><mailto:cat at loccc.com>
NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic information transmission is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at (206) 838-2528. Thank you.
<winmail.dat>_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180814/ffd06b90/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 15:19:11 +0000
From: Catherine Clark <Cat at loccc.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Partition Action or Not?
Message-ID:
<MWHPR19MB11992C8F717257BDA134C46CA33F0 at MWHPR19MB1199.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
All great points folks. Thank you!
Catherine ?Cat? Clark
Law Office of Catherine C. Clark PLLC
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1250
Seattle, WA 98121
Phone: (206) 838-2528
Cell: (206) 409-8938
Fax: (206) 374-3003
Email: cat at loccc.com<mailto:cat at loccc.com>
NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic information transmission is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at (206) 838-2528. Thank you.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Allen Sakai
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 1:33 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Partition Action or Not?
I am working on one now as referee where the divorce counsel did move for partition. One thing that you may want to consider is some sort of writ of ejectment order as part of the motion. Otherwise you?ll end up selling the property and the other party won?t leave. Then you can?t deliver possession to the buyer.
Allen R. Sakai
Attorney at Law
Jeppesen Gray Sakai P.S.
10655 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 801
Bellevue, WA 98004-5044
Phone: 425-454-2344
Fax: 425-646-8889
asakai at jgslaw.com<mailto:asakai at jgslaw.com>
www.jgslaw.com<http://www.jgslaw.com/>
This communication is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication by someone other than the intended addressee or its designated agent is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify this firm immediately by collect call to (425)-454-2344, or by reply to this communication.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Steve Tubbs
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 12:55 PM
To: wsbarp at lists. wsbarppt. com
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Partition Action or Not?
I?d offer a declaration in the disso action, setting out how, given the decree, refinancing by the obligee spouse is untenable, and that the obligor spouse has failed or refused to act. Based upon the same, the effective remedy is not a ?motion to compel?, but an order allowing the obligee to sell on reasonable terms, with the costs of the same to be deducted from the share of proceeds of sale payable to the defaulting party; and further that the defaulting party pay for the fees and costs otherwise incurred by the obligee spouse to enforce the decree provision pertaining to sale. Good luck!
On Aug 14, 2018, at 10:44 AM, Catherine Clark <Cat at loccc.com<mailto:Cat at loccc.com>> wrote:
All:
In a divorce, where there is a final decree directing one spouse to refinance or sell the property to buy the other spouse out, what would you do if the one spouse has not refinanced or sold the property as directed by the decree?
File a motion to enforce in the dissolution action or file a separate action for partition to force a sale. Refinancing in this circumstance is highly optimistic.
Thank you.
Catherine "Cat" Clark
Law Office of Catherine C. Clark PLLC
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1250
Seattle, WA 98121
Phone: (206) 838-2528
Cell: (206) 409-8938
Fax: (206) 374-3003
Email: cat at loccc.com<mailto:cat at loccc.com><mailto:cat at loccc.com>
NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic information transmission is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at (206) 838-2528. Thank you.
<winmail.dat>_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/2adc3b77/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 08:37:40 -0700
From: "Alan Middleton" <alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net>
To: <solo-and-small-practice-section at list.wsba.org>,
<wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett
Message-ID: <003e01d434ad$e8c57bf0$ba5073d0$@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Listmates, I need recommendations for a commercial RE appraiser to appraise
property located in Everett. Thanks!
Alan S. Middleton
Law Offices of Alan S. Middleton PLLC
10605 SE 240th St. PMB 444
Kent, WA 98031
Tel (206) 533-0490
<mailto:alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net> alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net
<http://www.alanmiddletonlaw.com/> www.alanmiddletonlaw.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/d8e4a972/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 15:44:03 +0000
From: "G. Geoffrey Gibbs" <ggibbs at andersonhunterlaw.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett
Message-ID:
<MWHPR14MB17759766A79F9FDADFE7EF02CB3F0 at MWHPR14MB1775.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
My "go to" commercial appraiser in the area is Jim Dodge and Valbridge. Extremely competent and professional and usually carries the day in court. jdodge at valbridge.com<mailto:jdodge at valbridge.com> In the same firm is Bob Macaulay who is also excellent. GGG
G. Geoffrey Gibbs | Anderson Hunter Law Firm
2707 Colby Avenue | Everett, WA 98201
Phone: (425) 252-5161 | Fax: (425) 258-3345
ggibbs at andersonhunterlaw.com<mailto:ggibbs at andersonhunterlaw.com> / www.andersonhunterlaw.com<http://www.andersonhunterlaw.com/>
[Description: Description: AH Color Large-no-tag]
This email message may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Alan Middleton
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 8:38 AM
To: solo-and-small-practice-section at list.wsba.org; wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBARP] Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett
Listmates, I need recommendations for a commercial RE appraiser to appraise property located in Everett. Thanks!
Alan S. Middleton
Law Offices of Alan S. Middleton PLLC
10605 SE 240th St. PMB 444
Kent, WA 98031
Tel (206) 533-0490
alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net<mailto:alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net>
www.alanmiddletonlaw.com<http://www.alanmiddletonlaw.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/6a47aa13/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1721 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/6a47aa13/image002-0001.jpg>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 08:47:10 -0700
From: "Alan Middleton" <alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett
Message-ID: <007c01d434af$3afbd210$b0f37630$@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks, Geoff.
Alan S. Middleton
Law Offices of Alan S. Middleton PLLC
10605 SE 240th St. PMB 444
Kent, WA 98031
Tel (206) 533-0490
<mailto:alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net> alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net
<http://www.alanmiddletonlaw.com/> www.alanmiddletonlaw.com
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
On Behalf Of G. Geoffrey Gibbs
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 8:44 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett
My "go to" commercial appraiser in the area is Jim Dodge and Valbridge.
Extremely competent and professional and usually carries the day in court.
jdodge at valbridge.com <mailto:jdodge at valbridge.com> In the same firm is Bob
Macaulay who is also excellent. GGG
G. Geoffrey Gibbs | Anderson Hunter Law Firm
2707 Colby Avenue | Everett, WA 98201
Phone: (425) 252-5161 | Fax: (425) 258-3345
ggibbs at andersonhunterlaw.com <mailto:ggibbs at andersonhunterlaw.com> /
<http://www.andersonhunterlaw.com/> www.andersonhunterlaw.com
This email message may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the
original message.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>
<wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com
<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> > On Behalf Of Alan Middleton
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 8:38 AM
To: solo-and-small-practice-section at list.wsba.org
<mailto:solo-and-small-practice-section at list.wsba.org> ;
wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com <mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett
Listmates, I need recommendations for a commercial RE appraiser to appraise
property located in Everett. Thanks!
Alan S. Middleton
Law Offices of Alan S. Middleton PLLC
10605 SE 240th St. PMB 444
Kent, WA 98031
Tel (206) 533-0490
<mailto:alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net> alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net
<http://www.alanmiddletonlaw.com/> www.alanmiddletonlaw.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/3446f2ad/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1721 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/3446f2ad/image001-0001.jpg>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 10:36:20 -0700
From: "Gregory L. Gilday" <cole-gilday at stanwoodlaw.net>
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Partition Action or Not?
Message-ID: <978863fd-10c3-aedb-494a-0a7156f4d467 at stanwoodlaw.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"
I just met with client who is in this same predicament - house was
awarded to his ex, it was never refinanced, and is now going through the
foreclosure process. There seems to equity there to protect, but the ex
refuses to do anything. ? As this is not in my wheelhouse, would anyone
like to take this on?? Client lives in Wenatchee and the dissolution was
in Lincoln County.? I'll pass on all names.
Thank you,
Very Truly Yours,
Gregory L. Gilday
Law Office of Cole & Gilday, P.C.
//
10101 - 270th St. NW
Stanwood, WA 98292
(360) 629-2900 (Telephone)
(360) 629-0220 (Fax)
This message contains confidential and privileged information that is
intended only for the named recipient(s).Unless you are the named
recipient or authorized agent thereof, you are prohibited from reading,
copying, distributing or otherwise disseminating such information.If you
receive this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately.
On 8/14/2018 10:44 AM, Catherine Clark wrote:
> All:
>
> In a divorce, where there is a final decree directing one spouse to refinance or sell the property to buy the other spouse out, what would you do if the one spouse has not refinanced or sold the property as directed by the decree?
>
> File a motion to enforce in the dissolution action or file a separate action for partition to force a sale. Refinancing in this circumstance is highly optimistic.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Catherine "Cat" Clark
> Law Office of Catherine C. Clark PLLC
> 2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1250
> Seattle, WA 98121
> Phone: (206) 838-2528
> Cell: (206) 409-8938
> Fax: (206) 374-3003
> Email: cat at loccc.com<mailto:cat at loccc.com>
>
> NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic information transmission is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone at (206) 838-2528. Thank you.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/8a208882/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 17:52:55 +0000
From: Gerald Sprute <sprutelaw at msn.com>
To: "RPPT listserv" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] medical file retention in Will?
Message-ID:
<CY4PR20MB12398E7EDB2518ABB40993A6AA3F0 at CY4PR20MB1239.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Good morning!
I?m drafting a Will for a client who is in the medical profession, and has her own client files that need to be retained for 10 years. She has a professional colleague who would take charge of the files after client passes, for whatever admin needs to be taken care of. Client is an anesthesiologist, no ongoing doctor-patient relation so that?s not a concern.
Is this something that you would put in the Will, or would this be better left as instructions to the Executor? There?s no asset value in the files, it?s more of a caretaker responsibility over the files. Any thoughts on the best way to address this?
Jerry Sprute
Law Office of Gerald A. Sprute
P.O. Box 1657
Duvall, WA 98019
Tel: (425) 892-4079
Fax: (425) 844-9151
www.sprutelaw.com <http://www.sprutelaw.com>
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this communication is Confidential and may also be Attorney-Privileged.
The information contained in this communication is intended for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that unauthorized viewing, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmission is in violation of the Electric Communications Privacy Act of 1986 as well as the Domestic and International Laws and Treaties. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify Gerald Sprute by telephone at 425.892.4079 and delete it from your system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/87c81b2b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 11:02:53 -0700
From: "Gregory L. Ursich" <gursich at insleebest.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett
Message-ID:
<7F8A366B7F232F429D049910E0F8A75102A17A32AD44 at Exch1.insleebest.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
At the same firm, Darrin Shedd, MAI, is also excellent, at Valbridge.
[cid:image001.jpg at 01D43487.7DA80660]
Gregory L. Ursich | Shareholder
Skyline Tower, Suite 1500 | 10900 NE 4th Street | Bellevue, WA 98004
P: 425.450.4258 | F: 425.635.7720
vCard<http://www.insleebest.com/uploads/vcards/gursich.vcf> | website<http://www.insleebest.com/> | gursich at insleebest.com<mailto:gursich at insleebest.com>
This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of G. Geoffrey Gibbs
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 8:44 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett
My "go to" commercial appraiser in the area is Jim Dodge and Valbridge. Extremely competent and professional and usually carries the day in court. jdodge at valbridge.com<mailto:jdodge at valbridge.com> In the same firm is Bob Macaulay who is also excellent. GGG
G. Geoffrey Gibbs | Anderson Hunter Law Firm
2707 Colby Avenue | Everett, WA 98201
Phone: (425) 252-5161 | Fax: (425) 258-3345
ggibbs at andersonhunterlaw.com<mailto:ggibbs at andersonhunterlaw.com> / www.andersonhunterlaw.com<http://www.andersonhunterlaw.com/>
[cid:image002.jpg at 01D43487.7DA80660]
This email message may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Alan Middleton
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 8:38 AM
To: solo-and-small-practice-section at list.wsba.org<mailto:solo-and-small-practice-section at list.wsba.org>; wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Commercial RE Appraiser in Everett
Listmates, I need recommendations for a commercial RE appraiser to appraise property located in Everett. Thanks!
Alan S. Middleton
Law Offices of Alan S. Middleton PLLC
10605 SE 240th St. PMB 444
Kent, WA 98031
Tel (206) 533-0490
alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net<mailto:alanscottmiddleton at comcast.net>
www.alanmiddletonlaw.com<http://www.alanmiddletonlaw.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/f1f34f0f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2843 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/f1f34f0f/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1721 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/f1f34f0f/image002-0001.jpg>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 18:27:56 +0000
From: Roger Hawkes <Roger at law-hawks.com>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] cpa north re property development
Message-ID:
<693DA7DDC963424895D6BBD758595A21835CD575 at HLFSERVER1.law-hawks.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks, Craig.
PLEASE NOTICE OUR NEW ADDRESS BELOW, ACROSS THE STREET ALMOST FROM OUR PRIOR ADDRESS; OTHER CONTACT INFO REMAINS THE SAME
Roger Hawkes, WSBA 5173
19944 Ballinger Way NE
Suite 100
Shoreline, WA 98155
www.hawkeslawfirm.com<http://www.hawkeslawfirm.com/>
206 367 5000 voice
206 367 4005 fax
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> On Behalf Of Craig Gourley
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 12:39 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] cpa north re property development
I have worked with Bob Bauer at Bauer Evans in Everett many times on complex real estate matters and respect his abilities. 425 252 6909
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> <wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>> On Behalf Of Roger Hawkes
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 12:12 PM
To: Real Property Listserve <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>>; Business Law Section <business-law-section at list.wsba.org<mailto:business-law-section at list.wsba.org>>
Subject: [WSBARP] cpa north re property development
A client is asking for a referral to a cpa familiar with real property development, preferably north king or south Snohomish county. Please refer someone(s).
PLEASE NOTICE OUR NEW ADDRESS BELOW, ACROSS THE STREET ALMOST FROM OUR PRIOR ADDRESS; OTHER CONTACT INFO REMAINS THE SAME
Roger Hawkes, WSBA 5173
19944 Ballinger Way NE
Suite 100
Shoreline, WA 98155
www.hawkeslawfirm.com<http://www.hawkeslawfirm.com/>
206 367 5000 voice
206 367 4005 fax
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/9b7edf82/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
End of WSBARP Digest, Vol 47, Issue 13
**************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20180815/e0ba2107/attachment.html>
More information about the WSBARP
mailing list