[WSBARP] UD and Tenant's Protection Order

Paul Neumiller pneumiller at hotmail.com
Tue Nov 21 11:14:18 PST 2017


Thanks to Danielle and Scott for their responses.  I am having a process server meet the landlord at the protection order hearing.  I am not handling the protection order hearing itself.

[cid:image003.jpg at 01D362B9.C88C8340]

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Danielle Flatt
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 2:58 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] UD and Tenant's Protection Order

Since the tenant is in breach, you can still proceed with the eviction.  If you are representing the LL at the Protection hearing, I would review the texts to make sure they could not be construed as threatening.  The judge will probably review them.  In cases I have dealt with in the past (where the facts fit), I have successfully argued that the protection order should be dismissed because the petitioner the dispute was a landlord-tenant dispute, and the landlord was acting within the bounds of Landlord-Tenant law, and was not actually harassing the petitioner.

If you can't get that, get the protection order modified so that the landlord can still carry out landlord duties.




Best Regards,

DANIELLE FLATT | ATTORNEY | DIMENSION LAW GROUP PLLC
130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 | Tukwila, WA 98188
t: 206.973.3500 | f: 206.577.5090| e: danielle at dimensionlaw.com<mailto:danielle at dimensionlaw.com>| www.dimensionlaw.com<http://www.dimensionlaw.com>
*PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW OFFICE ADDRESS*


On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Scott Thomas <scott at scottgthomaslaw.com<mailto:scott at scottgthomaslaw.com>> wrote:
When I have had a similar situation arise in the past, I have brought along my legal assistant and had the legal assistant hand the defendant the dox.  I have never been challenged doing that.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com>] On Behalf Of Paul Neumiller
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 2:24 PM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] UD and Tenant's Protection Order

Listmates:  Client landlord tries to sell house to month-to-month tenant but tenant is stalling etc.  LL finally gives up and tells T that T must move.  So, T goes into local district court and gets a Temporary Protection Order and Notice of Hearing-Harassment against LL stating that LL  sent harassing texts asking about the status of T receiving loan approval to purchase house. AND, T has stopped paying rent.


  1.  The Order is for no-contact and no surveillance, “except for mailing of court documents.”  The 3-day Notice under the lease was posted by LL BEFORE the Order was served on LL by the Sheriff.  Can LL (and therefore me) still proceed with an eviction action based on non-payment of rent in spite of the Temporary No-Contact Order??
  2.  The Protection hearing is set for next Wednesday.  I hope to file the eviction action on Tuesday and get the judge to sign an Order to Show Cause.  We strongly suspect that T will try to avoid service of the UD summons and complaint.  Because we know that T will be at the Protection hearing on Wednesday, is there a process where LL can serve the T with the UD documents while at the hearing for the Protection Order??  Do we ask court personnel to serve the documents or ask Sheriff/Police to stand by and serve, or have a private server show up?

[cid:image004.jpg at 01D362B9.C88C8340]


_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp


PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. Attempts to intercept this message are in violation of 18 USC 2511(1) of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, which subjects the interceptor to fines, imprisonment and/or civil damages. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by e-mail, facsimile, or telephone; return the e-mail to us at the e-mail address below; and destroy all paper and electronic copies. Any settlement offer contained herein is made pursuant to Washington ER 408, and without admitting fault or liability on the part of this firm’s client(s) or its agents.  IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLAIMER:  To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code; or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or tax-related matter addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20171121/77972c0d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14511 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20171121/77972c0d/image003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7318 bytes
Desc: image004.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20171121/77972c0d/image004.jpg>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list