[WSBARP] electronic signatures

[Kary Krismer]

I doubt that they have to, but they could.  The state statute (19.34.010 et seq) on "digital signatures” last time I checked only applied to a different type of system, and I doubt you have an impact on Interstate Commerce to allow the use of the federal statute (15 USC 7001(a).  The digital signatures recognized by the state look like this:

-------BEGIN SIGNATURE------

IQB1AwUBMVSiA5QYCuMfgNYjAQFAKgL/ZkBfbeNEsbthba4BlrcnjaqbcKgNv+
a5kr4537y8RCd+RHm75yYh5xxA1ojELwNhhb7cltrp2V7LlOnAelws4S87UX80c
LBtBcN6AACf11qymC2h+Rb2j5SU+rmXWru+=QFMx

------END SIGNATURE------

Note it’s been several years though since I looked at this issue, and then it was in another context (real estate purchase and sale agreements.)  

Kary L. Krismer
John L. Scott/KMS Renton
206 723-2148

From: Gregory L. Gilday
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 8:30 AM
To: WSBA RPPT Real Property Discussion Forum
Subject: [WSBARP] electronic signatures

Can anyone tell me if electronic signatures (e.g. through Authentisign or Docusign) are recognized by Snohomish courts on declarations?  I can't find a rule on it.  
-- 

 
Very Truly Yours,
Gregory L. Gilday 
Law Office of Cole & Gilday, P.C. 
 
10101 - 270th St. NW 
Stanwood, WA 98292 
(360) 629-2900 (Telephone) 
(360) 629-0220 (Fax) 
 
This message contains confidential and privileged information that is intended only for the named recipient(s).  Unless you are the named recipient or authorized agent thereof, you are prohibited from reading, copying, distributing or otherwise disseminating such information.  If you receive this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately.
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170619/8a006024/attachment.html>