[WSBARP] WSBARP Digest, Vol 32, Issue 27

Stephen Whitehouse swhite8893 at aol.com
Thu Jun 1 09:04:52 PDT 2017


Scott,
       I cannot help you on the specific bankruptcy issue but have two thoughts to pass along.
       The release of earnest money funds prior to closing is very odd. I am therefore assuming there has to be more to this. If the release was proximate to the bankruptcy filing, I would refer the matter for criminal charges. Theft covers a broad range of activities. The proximity issue relates to intent. If the funds were released a few days before closing, then the intent seems much clearer. If the funds were released a month ago, then the buyer could assert the intent occurred after the receipt.
       Also, if you could determine that the bankruptcy attorney had been consulted prior to the release of funds, then there may be a basis to refer the attorney to the bar association. That is a bit more difficult as it may be difficult to ascertain what the attorney did or did not know. 

Steve


Stephen Whitehouse
Whitehouse & Nichols, LLP
P.O. Box 1273
601 W. Railroad Ave.
Shelton, Wa. 98584
360-426-5885
swhite8893 at aol.com



-----Original Message-----
From: wsbarp-request <wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com>
To: wsbarp <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Sent: Wed, May 31, 2017 12:00 pm
Subject: WSBARP Digest, Vol 32, Issue 27

Send WSBARP mailing list submissions to
wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wsbarp-request at lists.wsbarppt.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
wsbarp-owner at lists.wsbarppt.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of WSBARP digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Quick Question on Boundary Adjustment (Oscar Yang, Esq.)
2. tax preparer recommendations needed (Joyce S Schwensen)
3. Re: RPPT First Right of Refusal (NC)
4. Re: RPPT First Right of Refusal (Bryce Dille)
5. Re: RPPT First Right of Refusal (Paul Barrera)
6. Bankruptcy and Real Estate Question (Scott Hildebrand)
7. Re: Bankruptcy and Real Estate Question (Kary Krismer)
8. Question (Sangeeta Saigal)
9. Re: Question (Scott Thomas)
10. Re: Question (Kary Krismer)
11. referral to attorney on Oahu (Robert S Schuck)
12. Re: referral to attorney on Oahu (Ronald L. Coleman)
13. Colville, Stevens County referral (Alexis Singletary)
14. Re: Colville, Stevens County referral (Josh Grant)
15. Re: Colville, Stevens County referral (Rob Rowley)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:21:45 -0700
From: "Oscar Yang, Esq." <oscar.yang at esberrylaw.com>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Quick Question on Boundary Adjustment
Message-ID: <00a701d2d979$fc3b7170$f4b25450$@esberrylaw.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Listmates,



I have a quick question on the boundary adjustment process that should not take more than a few min to answer. If you are familiar with the topic and can spare a few min, please let me know. 



Many thanks!



Oscar Yang

Managing Attorney 

ES BERRY LAW PC 

2155 112th Ave NE

Bellevue, WA 98004 



DISCLAIMER FROM ES BERRY LAW PC: This e-mail contains proprietary information some of which may be legally privileged, confidential or protected. It is for the intended recipient only. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by replying to it and delete it. This email is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Unauthorized disclosure, printing, forwarding, copying, distribution or other similar use of such information is strictly prohibited. Unless specifically and clearly expressed otherwise, this email also should not be interpreted as an electronic/digital signature that can be used to authenticate a contract or other legal document. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170530/7d91984c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4088 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170530/7d91984c/image001-0001.png>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:19:46 -0700
From: "Joyce S Schwensen" <joyce at schwensenlaw.com>
To: <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] tax preparer recommendations needed
Message-ID: <011a01d2d982$14f3e5f0$3edbb1d0$@schwensenlaw.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Greetings listmates,



I am working on a probate in which past tax returns need to be filed.
However, there is no information to go on beyond what we have been able to
get from the IRS (copies of 1099's etc.). Can anyone suggest a tax preparer
who can cope with the fact that there is little information available and no
avenue by which to obtain additional information?



Thanks, Joyce Schwensen 



Law Office of Joyce S. Schwensen

Joyce S. Schwensen, PS

6814 Greenwood Ave. N. 
Seattle, WA 98103 
Tel: (206) 367-1065 
Fax: (206) <mailto:781-7014Joyce at Schwensenlaw.com> 781-7014

<mailto:Joyce at Schwensenlaw.com> Joyce at Schwensenlaw.com

<http://www.schwensenlaw.com/> www.SchwensenLaw.com



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This communication (including any attachments) is confidential and may
contain legally privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error,
please delete this communication from your computer and do not retransmit,
copy, print or otherwise disseminate this communication.

ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP:
This e-mail does not in any way intend to provide legal advice to be relied
upon by any recipient and does not create any duty or obligation for legal
representation on behalf of the sender Joyce S. Schwensen, PS on behalf of
the recipient of this e-mail without a written engagement agreement.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170530/461084b0/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:20:49 -0400
From: NC <seaseanc at gmail.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] RPPT First Right of Refusal
Message-ID:
<CAE6xVyHHL--84QELhc36Rt8keM5L246FbJfkvMvu847tEdWQYA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Will you send a copy to me as well. Thank you.

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017, Ronald Housh <ron at housh.org> wrote:

> Wondering if anyone would be willing to share their "favorite" real estate
> first right of refusal agreement.
>
> Drafts that I have reviewed in the past often in my view have some "gaps"
> that create enforceability issues.
>
> Thanks in advance for any shared document(s).
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> *NOTE: I AM GENERALLY IN THE SEATTLE OFFICE ON TUESDAYS AND THURSDAYS AND
> THE MOUNT VERNON OFFICE ON MONDAYS, WEDNESDAYS AND FRIDAYS*
>
> *Ronald G. Housh P.S.*
>
> *Seattle office:*
> *1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3000*
> *Seattle, WA 98101-2393*
> *Phone: 206-381-1341*
> *Fax: 206-464-0461*
> *ron at housh.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ron at housh.org');>*
>
> *Mount Vernon office:*
> *21411 Blue Jay Place*
> *Mount Vernon, WA 98274*
> *ron at housh.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ron at housh.org');>*
> *Phone: 206-235-2459*
>
>
>
>

-- 
Nicholas L. Clapham
(206)939-0262

NOTICE- This email message may contain confidential and privileged
information. It is intended only for the named recipent(s) and may contain
attorney work product and/or information exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Any unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
all copies of the original message. This does not constitute an electronic
signature.

Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230 and other IRS
regulations, unless we expressly state otherwise, any tax advice contained
in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
tax-related penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or matter(s) addressed herein.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170530/c7191d6f/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:39:06 +0000
From: Bryce Dille <BryceD at cdb-law.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] RPPT First Right of Refusal
Message-ID:
<B3982DA158E09443BF4EE7AD2BB58257AAD6D2A0 at CDBS-SBS.cdb-law.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I?d appreciate copy as well thanks

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of NC
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:21 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] RPPT First Right of Refusal

Will you send a copy to me as well. Thank you.

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017, Ronald Housh <ron at housh.org<mailto:ron at housh.org>> wrote:
Wondering if anyone would be willing to share their "favorite" real estate first right of refusal agreement.

Drafts that I have reviewed in the past often in my view have some "gaps" that create enforceability issues.

Thanks in advance for any shared document(s).

Ron


NOTE: I AM GENERALLY IN THE SEATTLE OFFICE ON TUESDAYS AND THURSDAYS AND THE MOUNT VERNON OFFICE ON MONDAYS, WEDNESDAYS AND FRIDAYS

Ronald G. Housh P.S.

Seattle office:
1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3000
Seattle, WA 98101-2393
Phone: 206-381-1341
Fax: 206-464-0461
ron at housh.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ron at housh.org');>

Mount Vernon office:
21411 Blue Jay Place
Mount Vernon, WA 98274
ron at housh.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ron at housh.org');>
Phone: 206-235-2459




--
Nicholas L. Clapham
(206)939-0262

NOTICE- This email message may contain confidential and privileged
information. It is intended only for the named recipent(s) and may contain
attorney work product and/or information exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Any unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
all copies of the original message. This does not constitute an electronic
signature.

Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230 and other IRS
regulations, unless we expressly state otherwise, any tax advice contained
in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
tax-related penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or matter(s) addressed herein.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170530/109f9209/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 22:09:12 +0000
From: Paul Barrera <paul at northcitylaw.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] RPPT First Right of Refusal
Message-ID:
<CY1PR1101MB12281A12160CBEA49405E923AFF00 at CY1PR1101MB1228.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Me three, please.

Paul A. Barrera
Attorney

Office 206-413-7288
Email paul at northcitylaw.com<mailto:paul at northcitylaw.com>
Web www.northcitylaw.com<http://www.northcitylaw.com>

[red]

North City Law, PC
17713 15th Ave NE Suite 105
Shoreline, WA 98155
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this e-mail message and attachments may be attorney-client information, including privileged and confidential material, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity addressed to above. Any distribution, use, or review by unauthorized persons is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this transmission including attachments.

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Bryce Dille
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:39 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] RPPT First Right of Refusal

I?d appreciate copy as well thanks

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com<mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com> [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of NC
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:21 PM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] RPPT First Right of Refusal

Will you send a copy to me as well. Thank you.

On Tuesday, May 30, 2017, Ronald Housh <ron at housh.org<mailto:ron at housh.org>> wrote:
Wondering if anyone would be willing to share their "favorite" real estate first right of refusal agreement.

Drafts that I have reviewed in the past often in my view have some "gaps" that create enforceability issues.

Thanks in advance for any shared document(s).

Ron


NOTE: I AM GENERALLY IN THE SEATTLE OFFICE ON TUESDAYS AND THURSDAYS AND THE MOUNT VERNON OFFICE ON MONDAYS, WEDNESDAYS AND FRIDAYS

Ronald G. Housh P.S.

Seattle office:
1420 Fifth Avenue Suite 3000
Seattle, WA 98101-2393
Phone: 206-381-1341
Fax: 206-464-0461
ron at housh.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ron at housh.org');>

Mount Vernon office:
21411 Blue Jay Place
Mount Vernon, WA 98274
ron at housh.org<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ron at housh.org');>
Phone: 206-235-2459




--
Nicholas L. Clapham
(206)939-0262

NOTICE- This email message may contain confidential and privileged
information. It is intended only for the named recipent(s) and may contain
attorney work product and/or information exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Any unauthorized use is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
all copies of the original message. This does not constitute an electronic
signature.

Pursuant to U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230 and other IRS
regulations, unless we expressly state otherwise, any tax advice contained
in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
tax-related penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or matter(s) addressed herein.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170530/558711fc/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 13886 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170530/558711fc/image002-0001.png>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:45:13 -0700
From: "Scott Hildebrand" <scott at starboard-strategies.com>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Bankruptcy and Real Estate Question
Message-ID: <009e01d2d9c8$b1940480$14bc0d80$@starboard-strategies.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

A client of mine who had entered into a purchase and sale agreement a month
ago, waived inspection contingency and released $5,000 earnest money signed
closing papers today. The Seller was to have signed yesterday. Upon
returning to his office, he received a message from an attorney that the
Seller had filed bankruptcy and that the sale was off. Apparently the Seller
is in pre-foreclosure but that fact was not known until very recently (like
the last couple of days).



I know that bankruptcy can stop a sale at auction (as a result of
foreclosure) but can banko stop a legitimate and voluntary sale?



I would appreciate it if any of you crossover practitioners could help me
out on this one.



Thanks in advance.



Best,

Scott Hildebrand

Attorney at Law

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170530/6e8b8628/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 21:57:19 -0700
From: Kary Krismer <krismer at comcast.net>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Bankruptcy and Real Estate Question
Message-ID: <20170531045725657 at smtp629.redcondor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I haven?t practiced bankruptcy for over 10 years now, but I would assume this would be treated as an executory contract under 11 USC 365. I vaguely recall an old 9th Circuit case dealing with a real estate contract (the security type document not a real estate purchase and sale contract) which I believe held that type of device was executory. A purchase and sale contract would be even more likely to be so, absent some change in the Bankruptcy Act I don?t remember, or some new case law. 

If executory under bankruptcy law the trustee could assume or reject the contract, and if assumed the sale could proceed and if rejected you?d have a claim for damages, which most likely would not receive any payment (most estates don?t have any assets to liquidate). The trustee would only assume the contract if there was something in it for the estate beyond exemptions, or if the debtor gave them something out of their exemptions. Anyway, I would start with 11 USC 365 and executory contracts.

Not sure exactly how no one would know about a foreclosure. Apparently neither the listing agent or your client?s agent were looking at title reports.

Kary L. Krismer
John L. Scott/KMS Renton
206 723-2148

From: Scott Hildebrand
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:46 PM
To: 'WSBA Real Property Listserv'
Subject: [WSBARP] Bankruptcy and Real Estate Question

A client of mine who had entered into a purchase and sale agreement a month ago, waived inspection contingency and released $5,000 earnest money signed closing papers today. The Seller was to have signed yesterday. Upon returning to his office, he received a message from an attorney that the Seller had filed bankruptcy and that the sale was off. Apparently the Seller is in pre-foreclosure but that fact was not known until very recently (like the last couple of days).

I know that bankruptcy can stop a sale at auction (as a result of foreclosure) but can banko stop a legitimate and voluntary sale?

I would appreciate it if any of you crossover practitioners could help me out on this one.

Thanks in advance.

Best,
Scott Hildebrand
Attorney at Law

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170530/cfe5df6c/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 07:10:01 -0700
From: Sangeeta Saigal <attorney at sangeetasaigal.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Question
Message-ID: <126C23D5-6F0A-4BBA-83DA-034690A27F03 at sangeetasaigal.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Good All,



Any advice on the following issue would be greatly appreciated:



Property A?s sewer line runs through Property B.? Property B wants to modify the sewer line easement and relocate the sewer line connection within its property due to new construction project. ?Property B is asking Property A to sign a Sewer Easement Modification Agreement.



Any concerns with signing this?? Any issues to be aware of prior to signature?



Thanks,



Sangeeta



With Warm Regards,

Sangeeta Saigal 
Attorney at Law, PLLC 
Phone: 425.698-9828

Fax: 425-968-9837
Website: http://www.sangeetasaigal.com 

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachments,
contains information that may be confidential, and may also be
protected by attorney client privilege or work product doctrine. It is
intended solely for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at
attorney at sangeetasaigal.com and delete this message. You are hereby
notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message
is strictly prohibited. Nothing in this e-mail, including any
attachment, is intended to be a legally binding signature. To comply
with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax
issues in this email is not intended or written to be used, and cannot
be used by you, (a) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal
Revenue Code or (b) to promote, market, or recommend to another party
any transaction or matter addressed herein.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/a9c28296/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:00:17 -0700
From: Scott Thomas <scott.glen.thomas at gmail.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Question
Message-ID:
<CAH_+PbVWAxzCGieRe0cfXNTgbtr0fYqF0En1rnK55gQFeSOSgQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Some of the typical issues with a sewer line easement (which may, or may
not be applicable to your client's particular circumstances) are (1) who is
obligated to repair the sewer line when repairs are necessary; (2) how
difficult (costly) is it going to be to repair the line (i.e., is burdened
property going to put a huge rock wall or some other obstruction over the
line, making repairs more costly than usual, or is the easement so narrow
that it is not possible to get equipment in to make a repair to the
line?)); (3) is your client adequately protected from a contractor filing a
mechanic's lien in the event contractor is not paid for constructing a
sewer that benefits client's property; (4) is your client able to expand
the use of sewer line if client decides at a future date to increase use of
the line (by converting a single family residence to a multi-family
development, for example); does the agreement make clear that your client
is not obligated any connection fees to the sewer authority. At least,
these are the issues I have run into in the past. I am sure there are
others I have not thought of.

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Sangeeta Saigal <
attorney at sangeetasaigal.com> wrote:

> Good All,
>
>
>
> Any advice on the following issue would be greatly appreciated:
>
>
>
> Property A?s sewer line runs through Property B. Property B wants to
> modify the sewer line easement and relocate the sewer line connection
> within its property due to new construction project. Property B is asking
> Property A to sign a Sewer Easement Modification Agreement.
>
>
>
> Any concerns with signing this? Any issues to be aware of prior to
> signature?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Sangeeta
>
>
>
> With Warm Regards,
>
> Sangeeta Saigal
> Attorney at Law, PLLC
> Phone: 425.698-9828 <(425)%20698-9828>
>
> Fax: 425-968-9837 <(425)%20968-9837>
> Website: http://www.sangeetasaigal.com
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachments,
> contains information that may be confidential, and may also be
> protected by attorney client privilege or work product doctrine. It is
> intended solely for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at
> attorney at sangeetasaigal.com and delete this message. You are hereby
> notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message
> is strictly prohibited. Nothing in this e-mail, including any
> attachment, is intended to be a legally binding signature. To comply
> with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax
> issues in this email is not intended or written to be used, and cannot
> be used by you, (a) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal
> Revenue Code or (b) to promote, market, or recommend to another party
> any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>
> _______________________________________________
> WSBARP mailing list
> WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/01146ecc/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:16:33 -0700
From: Kary Krismer <krismer at comcast.net>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Question
Message-ID: <20170531151639454 at smtp422.redcondor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I would suggest doing a sewer scope prior to negotiating. It may be that part of the line needs to be replaced or is deteriorating, and since you have the other owner over a barrel you might be able to get them to repair more of the line on their dime as part of the relocation project. But without doing a sewer scope you won?t know that.

Kary L. Krismer
John L. Scott/KMS Renton
206 723-2148

From: Scott Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:01 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Question

Some of the typical issues with a sewer line easement (which may, or may not be applicable to your client's particular circumstances) are (1) who is obligated to repair the sewer line when repairs are necessary; (2) how difficult (costly) is it going to be to repair the line (i.e., is burdened property going to put a huge rock wall or some other obstruction over the line, making repairs more costly than usual, or is the easement so narrow that it is not possible to get equipment in to make a repair to the line?)); (3) is your client adequately protected from a contractor filing a mechanic's lien in the event contractor is not paid for constructing a sewer that benefits client's property; (4) is your client able to expand the use of sewer line if client decides at a future date to increase use of the line (by converting a single family residence to a multi-family development, for example); does the agreement make clear that your client is not obligated any connection fees to !
the sewer authority.? At least, these are the issues I have run into in the past.? I am sure there are others I have not thought of.

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Sangeeta Saigal <attorney at sangeetasaigal.com> wrote:
Good All,
?
Any advice on the following issue would be greatly appreciated:
?
Property A?s sewer line runs through Property B.? Property B wants to modify the sewer line easement and relocate the sewer line connection within its property due to new construction project.? Property B is asking Property A to sign a Sewer Easement Modification Agreement.
?
Any concerns with signing this?? Any issues to be aware of prior to signature?
?
Thanks,
?
Sangeeta
?
With Warm Regards,
Sangeeta Saigal?
Attorney at Law, PLLC?
Phone: 425.698-9828
Fax: 425-968-9837
Website:?http://www.sangeetasaigal.com?

?IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachments,
contains information that may be confidential, and may also be
protected by attorney client privilege or work product doctrine. It is
intended solely for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at
attorney at sangeetasaigal.com?and delete this message. You are hereby
notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message
is strictly prohibited. Nothing in this e-mail, including any
attachment, is intended to be a legally binding signature. To comply
with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax
issues in this email is not intended or written to be used, and cannot
be used by you, (a) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal
Revenue Code or (b) to promote, market, or recommend to another party
any transaction or matter addressed herein.

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/f5fe368b/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:06:40 +0000
From: Robert S Schuck <rsschuck at ksmlawfirm.com>
To: "wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] referral to attorney on Oahu
Message-ID:
<BN6PR08MB2593652C669F93294D7FFD17AEF10 at BN6PR08MB2593.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

PC has issues with former co-tenant for failure to play share of rent-PC paid more than share -co-tenant kept payment and failed to pay LL. Now LL is coming after PC


Robert S. Schuck
Kennedy,Schuck & Miller, PLLC
1520 140th NE, Suite 200
Bellevue, WA 98005
(425)451-3760 (telephone)
(425)451-3878 (facsimile)
rsschuck at ksmlawfirm.com<mailto:rsschuck at ksmlawfirm.com>

This correspondence is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may contain confidential information protected by Attorney-Client privilege. If you are not a person for whom this message was intended, please delete it from your system immediately, refrain from copying or forwarding any part of the message, and kindly notify me at (425) 451-3760 or at rsschuck at ksmlawfirm.com<mailto:rsschuck at qwest0ffice.net> Thank you.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/8d5e0aa2/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:45:51 +0000
From: "Ronald L. Coleman" <rcoleman at dpearson.com>
To: "'WSBA Real Property Listserv'" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] referral to attorney on Oahu
Message-ID:
<DB67B85F484BD544A7B8C59C5EE24227E36E6475 at MAILSRVR.dpearson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Larry Okinaga or someone in his firm will be able to assist your client:

Lawrence S. Okinaga "Larry"
Email: lokinaga at Carlsmith.com<mailto:lokinaga at Carlsmith.com>
Direct: (808) 523-2554
His assistant: Theola L. Kuamoo Email: tkuamoo at carlsmith.com<mailto:tkuamoo at carlsmith.com>

Carlsmith Ball LLP
ASB Tower, Suite 2100
1001 Bishop Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Tel. No.: (808) 523-2647
Fax No.: (808) 523-0842

Ron Coleman
Ronald L. Coleman
Direct 253-238-5129 - rcoleman at dpearson.com
Davies Pearson, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
920 Fawcett Avenue / PO Box 1657, Tacoma, WA 98401
253-620-1500 | Fax 253-238-5158 | www.dpearson.com<http://www.dpearson.com>
Download vCard<http://www.dpearson.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Ronald_1584702.vcf> | View Profile<http://www.dpearson.com/people/ronald-l-coleman>
From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Robert S Schuck
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:07 AM
To: wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com
Subject: [WSBARP] referral to attorney on Oahu

PC has issues with former co-tenant for failure to play share of rent-PC paid more than share -co-tenant kept payment and failed to pay LL. Now LL is coming after PC


Robert S. Schuck
Kennedy,Schuck & Miller, PLLC
1520 140th NE, Suite 200
Bellevue, WA 98005
(425)451-3760 (telephone)
(425)451-3878 (facsimile)
rsschuck at ksmlawfirm.com<mailto:rsschuck at ksmlawfirm.com>

This correspondence is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and may contain confidential information protected by Attorney-Client privilege. If you are not a person for whom this message was intended, please delete it from your system immediately, refrain from copying or forwarding any part of the message, and kindly notify me at (425) 451-3760 or at rsschuck at ksmlawfirm.com<mailto:rsschuck at qwest0ffice.net> Thank you.



This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. secs. 2510-2521, and is legally privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or call the sender at (800) 439-1112, and destroy all copies of the original message.

IRS regulations require us to advise you that, unless otherwise specifically noted, any federal tax advice in this communication (including any attachments, enclosures, or other accompanying materials) was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties; furthermore, this communication was not intended or written to support the promotion or marketing of any of the transactions or matters it addresses. Please call us for additional information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/7e088e80/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 17:52:02 +0000
From: Alexis Singletary <alexis at singletarylawoffice.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: [WSBARP] Colville, Stevens County referral
Message-ID:
<5D90537F3E9F9C469A8A93A24AD7EE795BBCB7 at W14MBX-CH2-D2.W14D.comcast.net>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Seeking attorney for jointly-owned real estate and apparent issues between co-owners (non-payment of share of real estate taxes; timber harvested without notice or accounting to other owner, etc.)
Real estate is in Colville, Stevens County, WA.
Thank you.
Alexis
____________________________
Alexis R. Singletary
Attorney at Law
Singletary Law Office, PLLC
253.833.8855
www.SingletaryLawOffice.com<http://www.singletarylawoffice.com/>

This message is from an attorney, so it?s confidential and may be protected by attorney-client privilege and/or the work-product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, it?s too late to stop reading this message, but you may not use it for any improper purpose. Huge Disclaimer available upon request.

CLIENT ADVISORY: A spam filter is in use in our IT system. If you have not received a Reply to an e-mail message within seventy-two hours, please call or leave a voice mail message with the receptionist at 253.833.8855.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/e0a0ac05/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 14
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:04:05 -0700
From: "Josh Grant" <jgrant at accima.com>
To: "WSBA Real Property Listserv" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Colville, Stevens County referral
Message-ID: <E2A7995E4D514863963D27820F85D6B8 at JoshPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Andy Braff 509 684 5212

From: Alexis Singletary 
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:52 AM
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv 
Subject: [WSBARP] Colville, Stevens County referral

Seeking attorney for jointly-owned real estate and apparent issues between co-owners (non-payment of share of real estate taxes; timber harvested without notice or accounting to other owner, etc.)

Real estate is in Colville, Stevens County, WA.

Thank you.

Alexis

____________________________

Alexis R. Singletary

Attorney at Law

Singletary Law Office, PLLC

253.833.8855

www.SingletaryLawOffice.com



This message is from an attorney, so it?s confidential and may be protected by attorney-client privilege and/or the work-product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, it?s too late to stop reading this message, but you may not use it for any improper purpose. Huge Disclaimer available upon request.



CLIENT ADVISORY: A spam filter is in use in our IT system. If you have not received a Reply to an e-mail message within seventy-two hours, please call or leave a voice mail message with the receptionist at 253.833.8855.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/a094a88c/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 15
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:07:51 -0700
From: Rob Rowley <rob at rowleylegal.com>
To: WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] Colville, Stevens County referral
Message-ID: <a59836cd4546b0e44a7b3e89c000d896 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Try Dave McGrane or Charlie Schuerman up in Colville.

http://www.mcgraneschuerman.com/





*Robert R. Rowley* | Attorney at Law

7 S. Howard St, Suite 218

Spokane, WA 99201

Telephone: (509) 252-5074

Mobile: (509) 994-1143

Facsimile: (509) 928-3084

Email: rob at rowleylegal.com

Web Site: www.rowleylegal.com



Practice concentrated on business, real estate and general legal matters in
Washington and Idaho.



<https://www.facebook.com/rowleylegal>
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/rob-rowley/11/172/b20>
<https://twitter.com/ROBERTRROWLEY>
<http://www.yelp.com/biz/robert-r-rowley-spokane>



NOTICE: The contents of this message and any attachments may be protected
by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine or other applicable
protections. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this
message in error, please notify the sender and promptly delete the
message. Thank you for your assistance.

DISCLAIMER: You should recognize that responses provided by e-mail means
are akin to ordinary telephone or face-to-face conversations and do not
reflect the level of factual or legal inquiry or analysis which would be
applied in the case of a formal legal opinion. A formal opinion may very
well reach a different conclusion.



*From:* wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:
wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] *On Behalf Of *Alexis Singletary
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 31, 2017 10:52 AM
*To:* WSBA Real Property Listserv <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com>
*Subject:* [WSBARP] Colville, Stevens County referral



Seeking attorney for jointly-owned real estate and apparent issues between
co-owners (non-payment of share of real estate taxes; timber harvested
without notice or accounting to other owner, etc.)

Real estate is in Colville, Stevens County, WA.

Thank you.

Alexis

*____________________________*

*Alexis R. Singletary*

Attorney at Law

Singletary Law Office, PLLC

253.833.8855

www.SingletaryLawOffice.com <http://www.singletarylawoffice.com/>



*This message is from an attorney, so it?s confidential and may be
protected by attorney-client privilege and/or the work-product
doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, it?s too late to stop
reading this message, but you may not use it for any improper purpose. Huge
Disclaimer available upon request.*



*CLIENT ADVISORY**: A spam filter is in use in our IT system. If you have
not received a Reply to an e-mail message within seventy-two hours, please
call or leave a voice mail message with the receptionist at 253.833.8855.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/e57a5043/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/e57a5043/image001-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1317 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/e57a5043/image003-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1295 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/e57a5043/image004-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1351 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/e57a5043/image005-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2555 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/e57a5043/image008-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170531/e57a5043/image009-0001.jpg>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
WSBARP mailing list
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp

End of WSBARP Digest, Vol 32, Issue 27
**************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20170601/b70a6efb/attachment.html>


More information about the WSBARP mailing list