[WSBARP] Unsolicited Direct Deposit of Past Due Rent - UD

[Douglas W. Scott]

That’s a good one.  Obviously, if owner was paid and accepted the funds, then tenant may have grounds to fight the eviction. But here the orders have all been signed by the Judge just not turned over to the sheriff for physical eviction, correct?  Please let me know what answers you get.

Douglas W. Scott
Law Offices of Douglas W. Scott
Windermere Building
1810 15th Place NW, Suite 203
Issaquah, Washington, 98027
V.  425.392.8550
F.  425-392-2829
www.davisscottlaw.com<http://www.davisscottlaw.com/>

From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of K. Garl Long
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 4:35 PM
To: WSBA RPPT Real Property Discussion Forum
Subject: [WSBARP] Unsolicited Direct Deposit of Past Due Rent - UD


After service of Writ but before physical eviction tenant partially pays back rent by direct deposit into owners bank account.  No prior notice to, or approval of, deposit by property owner.  Any affect on UD remedy?

Can Owner allow completion of physical eviction and keep funds?

K. Garl Long

--

Law Offices of K. Garl Long - Mount Vernon, Washington - (360) 336-3322

This message is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of the original message. Any retention, reproduction, use, or retransmission of this message, other than by the intended recipient(s), is prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20161122/8a265e5d/attachment.html>