[WSBARP] Holder of Note - no need to assign DOT

[Kathryn R. McKinley]

There is some discussion in this case which came out in slip opinion form today and cites to an unpublished decision from January which compiles cases on the issue.

Mar. 7, 2016 - 71995-5 - Chettie Mcaffee, Appellant V. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Et Al., Respondents
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/?fa=opinions.disp&filename=719955MAJ


Kathryn R. McKinley
[cid:image001.jpg at 01D19983.C644FAF0]
717 W. Sprague Ave. Suite 1200
Spokane, WA 99201
(509) 455-6000
kathryn.mckinley at painehamblen.com<mailto:cindy.bryan at painehamblen.com>


From: wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com [mailto:wsbarp-bounces at lists.wsbarppt.com] On Behalf Of Eric Nelsen
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 2:40 PM
To: WSBA Real Property listserve (wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com)
Subject: [WSBARP] Holder of Note - no need to assign DOT

Does anyone have the case law at their fingertips that holds that, if the Note is assigned, there is no requirement to record an assignment of the DOT securing it?

Sincerely,

Eric

Eric C. Nelsen
SAYRE LAW OFFICES, PLLC
1320 University St
Seattle WA  98101-2837
phone 206-625-0092
fax 206-625-9040

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20160418/6c74039c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2039 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20160418/6c74039c/image001.jpg>