[WSBARP] crazy contractor's lien

[Maureen Wickert]

Josh,  The many noted comments provide very good information about the lien.  For good measure, you may want throw in as well against the alleged contractors a Vulnerable Adult Protection Order (RCW 74.34) for financial exploitation. The alleged contractors smell of scammers and prying on the vulnerable. I don't think Adult Protection Service would be too happy with them. Although, Adult Protection Service does not investigate all matters.   

Very truly yours, 
Maureen A. Wickert, Attorney at Law 
         
       WICKERT LAW OFFICE 

14900 Interurban Avenue South, Ste 255 
        Tukwila, WA 98168 
       Phone: 206-859-5502 
         Fax: 206-260-9005 
     www.wickertlawoffice.com 
       wickertlaw at comcast.net 

This electronic message contains information which may be confidential and/or legally privileged. The information is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify me by telephone or by email immediately. 


----- Original Message -----

From: "scott scottgthomaslaw.com" <scott at scottgthomaslaw.com> 
To: "WSBA Real Property Listserv" <wsbarp at lists.wsbarppt.com> 
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 11:24:29 AM 
Subject: Re: [WSBARP] crazy contractor's lien 



See RCW 60.04.081 to get a frivolous lien released.  I have used this procedure several times, and find it effective.  The amount of a lien is the contract price, RCW 60.04.021, and that seems to have increased unrealistically based on your facts.  You may also want to question if they did only the cleanup agreed upon by the client, or went out of their way to provide extra (unlienable) services.  


As to clean up work, see RCW 60.04.011(4), which defines “furnishing labor, professional services, materials, or equipment” broadly as “the performance of any labor or professional services, the contribution owed to any employee benefit plan on account of any labor, the provision of any supplies or materials, and the renting, leasing, or otherwise supplying of equipment for the improvement of real property.”  “Labor” is defined to include “exertion of the powers of body or mind performed at the site for compensation.”  RCW 60.04.011(7).  Arguably, hauling off furniture to clean up a site is labor.  But see also (but don't get overly excited about) TPST Soil Recyclers of Wash., Inc. v. W.F. Anderson Constr., Inc., 91 Wn. App. 297, 957 P.2d 265 (1998).  The logic of the case seems suspect, but but there may be a "maintenance" vs. "improvement" distinction. 


Finally, you correctly point out that an unregistered contractor has no right to pursue a debt for the contractor's work in court. 


On September 14, 2015 at 10:32 AM Josh Grant <jgrant at accima.com> wrote: 

My client, a 83 year old widow, hired some neighborhood “friends”, one couple,  to help her dispose of furniture and property in a home after her husband died.  They worked a few days, she paid them $2000, and later they wanted more, having “forgotten” the $2000... Then characterizing the $2000 as a gift. 
  
  They recorded a contractor’s lien on the property for $8,500.  It reads: “I did furnish the following labor and/or materials: 10 weeks – assisting, cleaning, packing, moving to storage, yard work, rubish[sic] removal”. 
  
They did record the lien within about a week of the last day they were on the property. 
  
Home is assessed at $108,000 by Grant County. 
  No one, of course, is a licensed contractor. 
  The form doesn’t refer to any particular statutory lien, however, it is on the form customarily used by contractors.  (the footer on the lien form says NOVA LF 136 Claim of Lien Pg2 (07-11).  Not sure where they got it. They  Hand wrote in the spaces that are not pre-printed. 
  
I assume that a complaint for defamation of title and for quiet title will free up the lien so the widow can sell. 
  
Without doing research, I assume further that one cannot lien up real property after cleaning . 
  
Any thoughts?  Any other causes of action? 
Thanks 
  
Josh 
  
  
  
  
  
  





  
<blockquote>
_______________________________________________ 
WSBARP mailing list 
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com 
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp 
</blockquote>



  

Scott G. Thomas 
Law Office of Scott G. Thomas 
1204 Cleveland Avenue 
Mount Vernon, WA 98273 
(360) 503-1042 
www.scottgthomaslaw.com 

Because this is a communication from a lawyer, it necessarily contains warnings such as this. I am a lawyer, but unless we have entered into an agreement for legal services, I am not your lawyer. And, if this message was intended for someone else but you have inadvertently received it, I ask that you delete the message and let me know you received it so that I can take steps to make sure you do not receive messages in the future. Thank you. 


_______________________________________________ 
WSBARP mailing list 
WSBARP at lists.wsbarppt.com 
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/wsbarp 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.fsr.com/pipermail/wsbarp/attachments/20150914/e35540c2/attachment.html>